You could add barry the magic negro. Storybook man.
Stock market down
- Thread starter AOG
- Start date
And then those fuckers won't send Tim Horton's this direction either. That's just bullshit.
Our exports to Mexico/Canada make up 2% of our gdp.
Their exports to the US make up about 1/3rd of their gdp.
We aren't picking a fight with people in our grade level.
We’re also not “debating” on the Tug with Leftists at our grade level. All of that trade info has been posted for almost two months and these retards still don’t get this and the leverage it gives the USA over Canada.
When Buck is the smartest TugTard, it is what it is.
When Buck is the smartest TugTard, it is what it is.
Last edited:
US is playing a grown up game of smear the queer with Canada.
AOG
Active poster
A coherent argument does include emotion. But you assholes just use this which is incorrect reasoning:
Ad hominem (Latin for 'to the person'), short for
argumentum ad hominem
, refers to several types of arguments that are usually fallacious. Often currently this term refers to a rhetorical strategy where the speaker attacks the character, motive, or some other attribute of the person making an argument rather than the substance of the argument itself. This avoids genuine debate by creating a diversion often using a totally irrelevant, but often highly charged attribute of the opponent's character or background. The most common form of this fallacy is "A" makes a claim of "fact", to which "B" asserts that "A" has a personal trait, quality or physical attribute that is repugnant thereby going off-topic, and hence "B" concludes that "A" has their "fact" wrong – without ever addressing the point of the debate. Many contemporary politicians routinely use ad hominem attacks, some of which can be encapsulated to a derogatory nicknames for political opponents used instead of political argumentation. (But modern democracy requires that voters make character judgements of representatives, so opponents may reasonably criticize their characters and motives.)
AOG
Active poster
an unemotional argument is like
All As are Bs
A
Therefore A is B
which is purely formal.
All other judgments involve things like intuition and bias. There was a whole movement in the 70s of "heuristics and biases."
The issue you are missing is that being emotional doesn't allow you just to defame your opponent and pretend to win. You have penetrate the stronghold of the opponent's argument itself. Big difference.
All As are Bs
A
Therefore A is B
which is purely formal.
All other judgments involve things like intuition and bias. There was a whole movement in the 70s of "heuristics and biases."
The issue you are missing is that being emotional doesn't allow you just to defame your opponent and pretend to win. You have penetrate the stronghold of the opponent's argument itself. Big difference.
