Southern Miss WAREAGLE Forum

Here's another thread:
http://eaglepost.net/forum/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=363

WE?

"USM will actually beat them by 20+. We will have over 200 on the ground and 350 in the passing game. Defensive will get us points and one special team play for a turnover.
Peterson will be on the hot seat after this game going into his 3rd season.

USM 51
Washington 27"
 
I know I quit posting here, but I have to say I took a look at that thread and it deteriorated rapidly. It starts off fine, and then some huskyfan gets told to fuck his sister or such.

Well, I don't see the point of these SEC is not as good as PAC arguments. If they won't let the two play in playoffs, how can we know?

The south is biased in the polls as we can all see. For one thing there are 3 southern teams and MSU in the "playoffs." Condoleeza rice and Coach Willingham are black and they put this together. Sorry for the racist crap, but I don't think they think those stanford white guys can beat all our southern black guys.
Click to expand...

Serious question: WTH are you talking about? I was nice and didn't flag it since it wasn't about PLU playing Reed College in transvestite flag football this time.
 
I know I quit posting here, but I have to say I took a look at that thread and it deteriorated rapidly. It starts off fine, and then some huskyfan gets told to fuck his sister or such.

Well, I don't see the point of these SEC is not as good as PAC arguments. If they won't let the two play in playoffs, how can we know?

The south is biased in the polls as we can all see. For one thing there are 3 southern teams and MSU in the "playoffs." Condoleeza rice and Coach Willingham are black and they put this together. Sorry for the racist crap, but I don't think they think those stanford white guys can beat all our southern black guys.
Click to expand...

Serious question: WTH are you talking about? I was nice and didn't flag it since it wasn't about PLU playing Reed College in transvestite flag football this time.
Click to expand...

oklahoma, clemson, alabama, all southern teams... oklahoma not the deep south but still ~southern? the committee is not biased towards the south? Stanford plays a lot of white guys, the southern teams have almost all black guys? Stanford not seen as competitive against these teams?
Where did my reasoning go wrong?
 
How the hell did we miss the String! reunion/rematch angle?!??2
490416496-damoreea-stringfellow-of-the-mississippi-gettyimages.jpg
 
Here's another thread:
http://eaglepost.net/forum/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=363

WE?

"USM will actually beat them by 20+. We will have over 200 on the ground and 350 in the passing game. Defensive will get us points and one special team play for a turnover.
Peterson will be on the hot seat after this game going into his 3rd season.

USM 51
Washington 27"
Click to expand...

The way we came out for the last bowl game he's probably not wrong.
Click to expand...

Had the exact same reaction
 
I know I quit posting here, but I have to say I took a look at that thread and it deteriorated rapidly. It starts off fine, and then some huskyfan gets told to fuck his sister or such.

Well, I don't see the point of these SEC is not as good as PAC arguments. If they won't let the two play in playoffs, how can we know?

The south is biased in the polls as we can all see. For one thing there are 3 southern teams and MSU in the "playoffs." Condoleeza rice and Coach Willingham are black and they put this together. Sorry for the racist crap, but I don't think they think those stanford white guys can beat all our southern black guys.
Click to expand...

Serious question: WTH are you talking about? I was nice and didn't flag it since it wasn't about PLU playing Reed College in transvestite flag football this time.
Click to expand...

oklahoma, clemson, alabama, all southern teams... oklahoma not the deep south but still ~southern? the committee is not biased towards the south? Stanford plays a lot of white guys, the southern teams have almost all black guys? Stanford not seen as competitive against these teams?
Where did my reasoning go wrong?
Click to expand...

Stanfraud lost too many times.

But the SEC bias has been alive and well for many years, you're correct in that respect.

I think there's a subconscious bias against McCaffery because he's white.
 
Last edited:
I know I quit posting here, but I have to say I took a look at that thread and it deteriorated rapidly. It starts off fine, and then some huskyfan gets told to fuck his sister or such.

Well, I don't see the point of these SEC is not as good as PAC arguments. If they won't let the two play in playoffs, how can we know?

The south is biased in the polls as we can all see. For one thing there are 3 southern teams and MSU in the "playoffs." Condoleeza rice and Coach Willingham are black and they put this together. Sorry for the racist crap, but I don't think they think those stanford white guys can beat all our southern black guys.
Click to expand...

Serious question: WTH are you talking about? I was nice and didn't flag it since it wasn't about PLU playing Reed College in transvestite flag football this time.
Click to expand...

oklahoma, clemson, alabama, all southern teams... oklahoma not the deep south but still ~southern? the committee is not biased towards the south? Stanford plays a lot of white guys, the southern teams have almost all black guys? Stanford not seen as competitive against these teams?
Where did my reasoning go wrong?
Click to expand...

Stanfraud lost too many times.

But the SEC bias has been alive and well for many years, you're correct in that respect.

I think there's a subconscious bias against McCaffery because he's white.
Click to expand...

Well, it's insane to say the winner of the pac-12 is not good enough to play for the "national championship." I think there is a bias too against McCaffery, seriously.
 
I know I quit posting here, but I have to say I took a look at that thread and it deteriorated rapidly. It starts off fine, and then some huskyfan gets told to fuck his sister or such.

Well, I don't see the point of these SEC is not as good as PAC arguments. If they won't let the two play in playoffs, how can we know?

The south is biased in the polls as we can all see. For one thing there are 3 southern teams and MSU in the "playoffs." Condoleeza rice and Coach Willingham are black and they put this together. Sorry for the racist crap, but I don't think they think those stanford white guys can beat all our southern black guys.
Click to expand...

Serious question: WTH are you talking about? I was nice and didn't flag it since it wasn't about PLU playing Reed College in transvestite flag football this time.
Click to expand...

oklahoma, clemson, alabama, all southern teams... oklahoma not the deep south but still ~southern? the committee is not biased towards the south? Stanford plays a lot of white guys, the southern teams have almost all black guys? Stanford not seen as competitive against these teams?
Where did my reasoning go wrong?
Click to expand...

Stanfraud lost too many times.

But the SEC bias has been alive and well for many years, you're correct in that respect.

I think there's a subconscious bias against McCaffery because he's white.
Click to expand...

Well, it's insane to say the winner of the pac-12 is not good enough to play for the "national championship." I think there is a bias too against McCaffery, seriously.
Click to expand...

Fucking Christ. He's gonna be in New York, what more do you want? They could've picked Buckner or Mayfield, or a couple of other guys.

As for Stanford, they were toast once they lost to Northwestern, and then doubly so losing at home to what everyone can see was a subpar Oregon team.

Quite honestly, considering that the Dawgs were 6-6, who gives a fuck as long as the games are good and the champ is legit.
 
Northwestern was damn good this year, also was the first game of the year where you can expect some adjustments.... Oregon, I hate to say it but when you say "subpar" that puts them roughly at the level of the rest of the pac, which compared to the rest of D1 is pretty good. Those southern teams should try beating usc twice in one season.
 
Only a major fucking doog would simultaneously claim bias towards the south and against whites in the same poast. Pick one, you can't have both.
 
Northwestern was damn good this year, also was the first game of the year where you can expect some adjustments.... Oregon, I hate to say it but when you say "subpar" that puts them roughly at the level of the rest of the pac, which compared to the rest of D1 is pretty good. Those southern teams should try beating usc twice in one season.
Click to expand...

That was a GOOD Northwestern team, guys.
 
waiting for approval there....annoying
Click to expand...
http://eaglepost.net/forum/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=84

apparently you have to jump through their convoluted hoops in order to post:

How Do I Join Eaglepost
Postby Management » Mon Oct 26, 2015 11:29 am
1) Register with the site.
2) Email the administrator at baldeagle90@gmail.com. Indicate the username and why you want to join eaglepost.
3) If you receive an email from the administrator, respond.
4) We will activate you as soon as possible.
5) Enjoy reading eaglepost in the meantime.

Note: If you were registered on the old board, you will have to re-register. Sorry for the inconvenience.
Click to expand...
Click to expand...

I don't think you have to do all that shit, when I first signed up I just registered through the register link.
 
It took me a few days to get approved and I had to send a PM to make it happen.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top