Soooooo where’s those Epstein files

HHusky said:
Race helpfully explains that the "binders of information" in the administration's possession cannot be released now because Biden was once the President and Tulsi has a shiny new conspiracy theory about a black guy.
Click to expand...
What binders? The empty fake ones
Release them
H decides Epstein is real now after claiming it wasn't
The party told him to
 
DucksFC said:
triggered the old man again, I see.
it's fascinating to watch in real time the shift of the sewing circle to distractions and panic as it dawns on them that Daddy really is on the list.
Click to expand...
Since we've been calling for it for years you make no sense as usual
The only panic is from Team Treason
Deflecting by trying now to claim Trump is on some Epstein list
I'm not mad. I always tell trolls to fuck off
It's all your worth
 
RaceBannon said:
HHusky said:
Race helpfully explains that the "binders of information" in the administration's possession cannot be released now because Biden was once the President and Tulsi has a shiny new conspiracy theory about a black guy.
Click to expand...
What binders? The empty fake ones
Release them
H decides Epstein is real now after claiming it wasn't
The party told him to
Click to expand...
There are files. Daddy and other prominent pols and celebrities are in them.
There is no client list—though you girls campaigned on its existence, you're running away from the claim like scalded dogs now.
Me. I haven't moved. I've been right all along. Per usual.
 
Last edited:
HHusky said:
RaceBannon said:
HHusky said:
Race helpfully explains that the "binders of information" in the administration's possession cannot be released now because Biden was once the President and Tulsi has a shiny new conspiracy theory about a black guy.
Click to expand...
What binders? The empty fake ones
Release them
H decides Epstein is real now after claiming it wasn't
The party told him to
Click to expand...
There are files. Daddy and other prominent pols and celebrities are in them.
There is no client list—though you girls campaigned on its existence, you're running away from the claim like scalded dogs now.
Me. I haven't moved. I've been right all along. Per usual.
Click to expand...
Jfc.
Try harder to change your story faggot.
 
Goduckies said:
If a judge won't release the info, how can Trump?
Click to expand...
because releasing grand jury transcripts is rarely done, if ever. And considering Blondi and Patel said there's no list, they didn't meet the requirement to release it. Shooting themselves in the foot and then trying to say everything's OK.
U.S. District Judge Robin Rosenberg concluded she was required to dismiss the department’s request because of longstanding grand jury secrecy rules that include only a few narrow exceptions — none of which she said the Justice Department met in this case.
The grand jury testimony that the department seeks to release, however, is only a small portion of the thousands of documents related to the Epstein investigation and criminal case. Many of those documents are already in Justice Department custody and may not have been presented to the jury.
Because the grand jury docket is still under seal, Rosenberg ordered that a new case should be opened as “a matter of public interest” with both the Justice Department’s request and her denial order.
 
Last edited:
UW_Doog_Bot said:
HHusky said:
RaceBannon said:
HHusky said:
Race helpfully explains that the "binders of information" in the administration's possession cannot be released now because Biden was once the President and Tulsi has a shiny new conspiracy theory about a black guy.
Click to expand...
What binders? The empty fake ones
Release them
H decides Epstein is real now after claiming it wasn't
The party told him to
Click to expand...
There are files. Daddy and other prominent pols and celebrities are in them.
There is no client list—though you girls campaigned on its existence, you're running away from the claim like scalded dogs now.
Me. I haven't moved. I've been right all along. Per usual.
Click to expand...
Jfc.
Try harder to change your story faggot.
Click to expand...
I’m saying precisely the same thing I’ve been saying all along. But why are you still talking about this, Rube? Daddy told you to shut up. Just follow your orders and no one gets hurt. K?
 
Last edited:
It's hilarious that the guys (maybe) in here raving about Trump not releasing pedogate are the guys that voted for PedoJoe and Obama, a gay pedo.
Talk about closeted.
 
RaceBannon said:
DucksFC said:
triggered the old man again, I see.
it's fascinating to watch in real time the shift of the sewing circle to distractions and panic as it dawns on them that Daddy really is on the list.
Click to expand...
Since we've been calling for it for years you make no sense as usual
The only panic is from Team Treason
Deflecting by trying now to claim Trump is on some Epstein list
I'm not mad. I always tell trolls to fuck off
It's all your worth
Click to expand...
two weeks
 
DucksFC said:
Goduckies said:
If a judge won't release the info, how can Trump?
Click to expand...
because releasing grand jury transcripts is rarely done, if ever. And considering Blondi and Patel said there's no list, they didn't meet the requirement to release it. Shooting themselves in the foot and then trying to say everything's OK.
U.S. District Judge Robin Rosenberg concluded she was required to dismiss the department’s request because of longstanding grand jury secrecy rules that include only a few narrow exceptions — none of which she said the Justice Department met in this case.
The grand jury testimony that the department seeks to release, however, is only a small portion of the thousands of documents related to the Epstein investigation and criminal case. Many of those documents are already in Justice Department custody and may not have been presented to the jury.
Because the grand jury docket is still under seal, Rosenberg ordered that a new case should be opened as “a matter of public interest” with both the Justice Department’s request and her denial order.
Click to expand...
See see see see soccerduck doesn't want it released!!!!!1122!!!
 
DucksFC said:
Goduckies said:
If a judge won't release the info, how can Trump?
Click to expand...
because releasing grand jury transcripts is rarely done, if ever. And considering Blondi and Patel said there's no list, they didn't meet the requirement to release it. Shooting themselves in the foot and then trying to say everything's OK.
U.S. District Judge Robin Rosenberg concluded she was required to dismiss the department’s request because of longstanding grand jury secrecy rules that include only a few narrow exceptions — none of which she said the Justice Department met in this case.
The grand jury testimony that the department seeks to release, however, is only a small portion of the thousands of documents related to the Epstein investigation and criminal case. Many of those documents are already in Justice Department custody and may not have been presented to the jury.
Because the grand jury docket is still under seal, Rosenberg ordered that a new case should be opened as “a matter of public interest” with both the Justice Department’s request and her denial order.
Click to expand...
So she said again they can't release them
 
Again, we started out in agreement with this. All that’s needed here is transparency and this thing goes away. The administration instead had decided to:
-State that there is no file
-Blame Obama for creating the list
-Manufacture new ways to distract : Deport Rosie ODonnell, change Commanders to Redskins, accuse Obama of treason which no one else has
I get it. His name is on the list. That doesn’t mean he’s guilty of anything. But the more he insists on fighting it, trying to roadblock it, attacking people who bring it up, the more guilty he looks of something.
 
HuskyBuck said:
Again, we started out in agreement with this. All that’s needed here is transparency and this thing goes away. The administration instead had decided to:
-State that there is no file
-Blame Obama for creating the list
-Manufacture new ways to distract : Deport Rosie ODonnell, change Commanders to Redskins, accuse Obama of treason which no one else has
I get it. His name is on the list. That doesn’t mean he’s guilty of anything. But the more he insists on fighting it, trying to roadblock it, attacking people who bring it up, the more guilty he looks of something.
Click to expand...
The depths of the moronic mind make the oceans look like a shot glass.
 
Last edited:
Trump isn't fighting anything
99% of the people here agree that the whole binder thing was retarded and the root of a lot of the problems
But try to focus bucky on the actual fact at hand
Epstein is a founder of the Clinton Scam and the democrats protected him since 2007 even after Trump got him arrested and charged
Just because Trump is kicking ass all over the place doesn't make it a distraction. I know you're used to Biden calling it a day at 10AM but Trump works 18 hours a day and is accomplishing more in 6 months than the sock puppet did in 4 years
Trump did call for the Grand Jury docs and an Obama judge did deny it while leaking that his name is on it so the usual retards can do their usual smear and distract from the overwhelming evidence the DNI is revealing about Russiagate
And yet little bucky hasn't said shit about all that
I do appreciate the democrats finally faking interest in Epstein. Be careful what you wish for
 
Goduckies said:
DucksFC said:
Goduckies said:
If a judge won't release the info, how can Trump?
Click to expand...
because releasing grand jury transcripts is rarely done, if ever. And considering Blondi and Patel said there's no list, they didn't meet the requirement to release it. Shooting themselves in the foot and then trying to say everything's OK.
U.S. District Judge Robin Rosenberg concluded she was required to dismiss the department’s request because of longstanding grand jury secrecy rules that include only a few narrow exceptions — none of which she said the Justice Department met in this case.
The grand jury testimony that the department seeks to release, however, is only a small portion of the thousands of documents related to the Epstein investigation and criminal case. Many of those documents are already in Justice Department custody and may not have been presented to the jury.
Because the grand jury docket is still under seal, Rosenberg ordered that a new case should be opened as “a matter of public interest” with both the Justice Department’s request and her denial order.
Click to expand...
So she said again they can't release them
Click to expand...
Wrong. She won't unseal grand jury transcripts. Period.
What's in Pam's binders?
 
Goduckies said:
DucksFC said:
Goduckies said:
If a judge won't release the info, how can Trump?
Click to expand...
because releasing grand jury transcripts is rarely done, if ever. And considering Blondi and Patel said there's no list, they didn't meet the requirement to release it. Shooting themselves in the foot and then trying to say everything's OK.
U.S. District Judge Robin Rosenberg concluded she was required to dismiss the department’s request because of longstanding grand jury secrecy rules that include only a few narrow exceptions — none of which she said the Justice Department met in this case.
The grand jury testimony that the department seeks to release, however, is only a small portion of the thousands of documents related to the Epstein investigation and criminal case. Many of those documents are already in Justice Department custody and may not have been presented to the jury.
Because the grand jury docket is still under seal, Rosenberg ordered that a new case should be opened as “a matter of public interest” with both the Justice Department’s request and her denial order.
Click to expand...
So she said again they can't release them
Click to expand...
it’s not surprising the shoe polisher doesn’t understand what grand jury transcripts are, how they’re different from the actual files, and why they hardly ever get released in any circumstance.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top