Someone explain this to me...

[Tequilla]

Is anyone surprised Babushka can't recruit?

Has he put QB's in the NFL?

Have his offenses been good?

Is he a charismatic guy?

He's a fucking geek who from all appearances has no social skills and has a shitty coaching track record.

You also just described 81% of the people on this bored

81% at least have some internet charisma.

Only in your mind

 

[CuntWaffle]

LIFPO

 

[WilburHooksHands]

Is anyone surprised Babushka can't recruit?

Has he put QB's in the NFL?

Have his offenses been good?

Is he a charismatic guy?

He's a fucking geek who from all appearances has no social skills and has a shitty coaching track record.

You also just described 81% of the people on this bored

81% at least have some internet charisma.

 

[TTJ]

AVT will ultimately commit to us.

 

[Pitchfork51]

Awfully warm for September

 

[BallSacked]

AVT will ultimately commit to ucla.

 

[Baphomet]

Pulling a huge loser maneuver and responding to this early. Just went to doogfarm to check Ektards rankings. Per that, Pete is looking decent, great DB recruiting (like always thanks Lake), great DT, good WR/TE and ATH spread, and then craptastic QB/OL recruiting. In state results look good now but will look like crap if we get Bryant and keep Wedington, but will look like shit if we lose either of them and Sarell, Ahmed, and Bainavulva go elsewhere.

Anyway this is too much bullshit. Class still doesn't seem as good as when we had no hype and no ranking. WTF?

A few thoughts

1. UW has had a top 10 ranking for like two weeks, not sure it's reasonable to expect massive impact from that already.

2. Peterman does not give a fuck about recruiting rankings, so even in the unlikely event UW is in the top 10 all year and finishes in the top 10, I'm not sure it will make a huge difference at UW like it would have under, say, Sark, who wanted all the highly rated guys he could get.

3. Recruiting lag theory says the 2015 season has a bigger impact on Feb 2017 class than 2016 season. Assuming that theory holds true (and it seems fairly accurate) the REAL impact of this season (whatever that might be) won't be felt until the next recruiting class.

Tl; dr: LIPO

Pete may not give a fuck about rankings, but to Swaye's point he surely gives a fuck about Foster Sarrell - hence the heli ride to his high school game. We are struggling to get decent OL verbals this year, and right now it looks like Foster is headed to 'furd.

If UW really cared about football, they'd make UW a better academic institution than Stanford, so we don't keep losing great OL players to them.

 

[EwaDawg]

Pulling a huge loser maneuver and responding to this early. Just went to doogfarm to check Ektards rankings. Per that, Pete is looking decent, great DB recruiting (like always thanks Lake), great DT, good WR/TE and ATH spread, and then craptastic QB/OL recruiting. In state results look good now but will look like crap if we get Bryant and keep Wedington, but will look like shit if we lose either of them and Sarell, Ahmed, and Bainavulva go elsewhere.

Anyway this is too much bullshit. Class still doesn't seem as good as when we had no hype and no ranking. WTF?

A few thoughts

1. UW has had a top 10 ranking for like two weeks, not sure it's reasonable to expect massive impact from that already.

2. Peterman does not give a fuck about recruiting rankings, so even in the unlikely event UW is in the top 10 all year and finishes in the top 10, I'm not sure it will make a huge difference at UW like it would have under, say, Sark, who wanted all the highly rated guys he could get.

3. Recruiting lag theory says the 2015 season has a bigger impact on Feb 2017 class than 2016 season. Assuming that theory holds true (and it seems fairly accurate) the REAL impact of this season (whatever that might be) won't be felt until the next recruiting class.

Tl; dr: LIPO

Yep. 2017 will be special.