@swaye, so here's an Omega vs Rolex question: So, obviously these are the 2 most recognizable luxury brands for professional watches. And MSRP on a new Omega Seamaster is $5,000 and a SS Submariner Date is $8500 (not that you can go into a store and buy it whenever you want). Is there really a difference between the two in terms of quality of movement and other material used that makes the Rolex command a lot more or is it all cache?
I guess I'm a loser because Connery wore Rolen and Piece and Daniel Craig wore Omega.
![]()
Many many people say the brand new Omega SM is a better watch than a Sub, from a technical standpoint, for 30% less. I can believe it. Omega has always been super good technically. And I think they are better at pushing the boundaries, whereas Rolex is a much steadier slow company. That said, the Sub is one of the 3 most iconic watches in history, and the Omega is not. I find the Sub to be much classier and more classic, and the Omega is sportier and more "now."
You can't go wrong with either. I have been asked before "What are three watches I should own before I die?" Easy answer. Rolex Submariner, Rolex GMT, and an Omega Speedmaster Professional (only the professional version though). To me those are the three most instantly recognizable watches in the world with the most amazing histories attached to them.
IFL the Omega Speedmaster. Except I would feel like a poser, since I think my vehicle has a speed governor at like 85 MPH. At least with a GMT, I can fly on an airplane or going snorkeling with little fishies in HI.
