So....

the only thing more trolling/idiotic than this post are duck fans saying, "whatever, they switched out one 8-win coach for another." I'm not saying we're gonna beat them this year, but we'll be a better overall team on day 1 and will be devoid of all the fucktarded penalties/mishaps.

This!

Sark upgraded the talent but after 5 years we saw the same shitshow as year 1. Drive killing penalties, lack of focus, lack of discipline and fundamentals. It's not something a coach usually grows out of in my observation. It's Sarkingham's style and he'll likely carry that on to SC.

The thing that impresses me about Petersen, even more than his record, is his attention to detail. His teams are just prepared and disciplined. That's coaching....whether you're in the WAC or the P12.
 
You could be right. Petersen might turn out to be a bust. But this thread is fucking horrible and just the same re hashed bullshit everyone said after the hire.

92-12 is 92-12. The hire at the time was a good hire. Sure we might look back and go "wow we fucked that one up again"

However using the argument that Riley beat his leftovers as evident he is overrated earns you the "FS" tag and you need to find the nearest cliff to jump off of.
 
Sark destroys Pete and Riley, USC hired Sark. Riley destroys Pete's leftovers.

UW fans call Sark & Riley mediocre, hail Pete as awesome.

Are HHB's pressing?

Looking at your NBA thread proclaiming the Blazers already being better than a team who won 64 games and went to the Finals I'd say you are the expert on pressing.

P.S. What is Pete's record against Oregon? ;-)
 
Back
Top