So... this is a thing? UCSB killer and PUAHate

[oregonblitzkrieg]

The cops did show up at his place, but I don't see how they could search his place with no warrant. I think if you are a 5150 in California, they can apprehend you, but there is a procedure I would suspect. But, he's still got rights if he has not broken any law. I'm not sure if there is ever a defense against a determined psycho. It's a serious problem with the human race, as weapons could fall into the hands of one, I mean nukes and such. He was completely bonkers, too.

He's entitled to rights and should be - in the same way Snohomish should be entitled to the right to play in the PAC 12.

 

[d2d]

The cops did show up at his place, but I don't see how they could search his place with no warrant. I think if you are a 5150 in California, they can apprehend you, but there is a procedure I would suspect. But, he's still got rights if he has not broken any law. I'm not sure if there is ever a defense against a determined psycho. It's a serious problem with the human race, as weapons could fall into the hands of one, I mean nukes and such. He was completely bonkers, too.

So, let me get this straight... Obama and Jerry Brown give a fuck about the Fourth Amendment?

You really need to start paying attention in here.

 

[ApostleofGrief]

The cops did show up at his place, but I don't see how they could search his place with no warrant. I think if you are a 5150 in California, they can apprehend you, but there is a procedure I would suspect. But, he's still got rights if he has not broken any law. I'm not sure if there is ever a defense against a determined psycho. It's a serious problem with the human race, as weapons could fall into the hands of one, I mean nukes and such. He was completely bonkers, too.

He's entitled to rights and should be - in the same way Snohomish should be entitled to the right to play in the PAC 12.

I've played against Snohomish. I know Snohomish. I used to hate them, now I just respect them.

 

[dnc]

WHERE ARE THE FUCKING THREAD POLICE? MODS? YOU'D BETTER PULL THIS THREAD BEFORE "HE NEEDS MORE DICKS UP HIS ASS" FUCKING SEES IT! THIS IS THE THIRD FUCKING THREAD ON THIS FUCKING TOPIC! THAT'S TORTIOUS FUCKING THREAD REPETITION! THAT'S AGAINST THE HH FUCKING CONSTITUTION!

oh, i forgot, we don't give a fuck about constitutions in here... my bad.

 

[MikeDamone]

The cops did show up at his place, but I don't see how they could search his place with no warrant. I think if you are a 5150 in California, they can apprehend you, but there is a procedure I would suspect. But, he's still got rights if he has not broken any law. I'm not sure if there is ever a defense against a determined psycho. It's a serious problem with the human race, as weapons could fall into the hands of one, I mean nukes and such. He was completely bonkers, too.

They could probably have gotten a warrant based on the videos that were out there and the parents knew about. But that would have required work.

 

[MikeDamone]

The cops did show up at his place, but I don't see how they could search his place with no warrant. I think if you are a 5150 in California, they can apprehend you, but there is a procedure I would suspect. But, he's still got rights if he has not broken any law. I'm not sure if there is ever a defense against a determined psycho. It's a serious problem with the human race, as weapons could fall into the hands of one, I mean nukes and such. He was completely bonkers, too.

That does bring up the question: at what point does an insane person lose rights, what rights do they lose, and who decides?

 

[AZDuck]

Involuntary civil commitment

Involuntary civil commitment is the admission of individuals against their will into a mental health unit. Generally speaking, there are three reasons why an individual would be subject to involuntary civil commitment under modern statutes: mental illness, developmental disability, and substance addiction. In the case of mental illness, dangerousness to self or others defines the typical commitment standard, with almost all states construing the inability to provide for one's basic needs as dangerousness to self. In terms of process, every state provides for a hearing, the right to counsel, and periodic judicial review, while most states have statutory quality standards for treatment and hospitalization environment.

Source: Ralph Reisner, Christopher Slobogin, and Arti Rai, Law and the Mental Health System: Civil and Criminal Aspects (2009), pp. 704-705.

keywords:

mental health law

For spooge:

ความมุ่งมั่นของพลเรือนโดยไม่สมัครใจ

ความมุ่งมั่นของพลเรือนโดยไม่สมัครใจเข้ารับการรักษาเป็นของบุคคลกับความประสงค์ของพวกเขาเป็นหน่วยสุขภาพจิต ความเจ็บป่วยทางจิตพิการพัฒนาการและติดยาเสพติดสาร: โดยทั่วไปมีสามเหตุผลที่แต่ละคนจะต้องอยู่ภายใต้ความมุ่งมั่นตั้งใจพลเรือนภายใต้กฎเกณฑ์ที่ทันสมัย ในกรณีที่มีความเจ็บป่วยทางจิตที่เป็นภัยกับตัวเองหรือผู้อื่นกำหนดมาตรฐานความมุ่งมั่นทั่วไปเกือบทุกรัฐ construing ไม่สามารถที่จะให้สำหรับความต้องการขั้นพื้นฐานของคนที่เป็นภัยต่อตัวเอง ในแง่ของกระบวนการทุกรัฐให้การได้ยินที่เหมาะสมที่จะให้คำปรึกษาและการทบทวนการพิจารณาคดีเป็นระยะในขณะที่รัฐส่วนใหญ่มีคุณภาพมาตรฐานตามกฎหมายสำหรับสภาพแวดล้อมการรักษาและการรักษาในโรงพยาบาล

ที่มา: ราล์ฟ Reisner, คริสโต Slobogin และ Arti เชียงราย, กฎหมายและระบบสุขภาพจิต: ด้านประมวลกฎหมายแพ่งและกฎหมายอาญา (2009), pp 704-705

คำหลัก:

กฎหมายสุขภาพจิต

The cops did show up at his place, but I don't see how they could search his place with no warrant. I think if you are a 5150 in California, they can apprehend you, but there is a procedure I would suspect. But, he's still got rights if he has not broken any law. I'm not sure if there is ever a defense against a determined psycho. It's a serious problem with the human race, as weapons could fall into the hands of one, I mean nukes and such. He was completely bonkers, too.

That does bring up the question: at what point does an insane person lose rights, what rights do they lose, and who decides?

 

[MikeDamone]

Involuntary civil commitment

Involuntary civil commitment is the admission of individuals against their will into a mental health unit. Generally speaking, there are three reasons why an individual would be subject to involuntary civil commitment under modern statutes: mental illness, developmental disability, and substance addiction. In the case of mental illness, dangerousness to self or others defines the typical commitment standard, with almost all states construing the inability to provide for one's basic needs as dangerousness to self. In terms of process, every state provides for a hearing, the right to counsel, and periodic judicial review, while most states have statutory quality standards for treatment and hospitalization environment.

Source: Ralph Reisner, Christopher Slobogin, and Arti Rai, Law and the Mental Health System: Civil and Criminal Aspects (2009), pp. 704-705.

keywords:

mental health law

For spooge:

ความมุ่งมั่นของพลเรือนโดยไม่สมัครใจ

ความมุ่งมั่นของพลเรือนโดยไม่สมัครใจเข้ารับการรักษาเป็นของบุคคลกับความประสงค์ของพวกเขาเป็นหน่วยสุขภาพจิต ความเจ็บป่วยทางจิตพิการพัฒนาการและติดยาเสพติดสาร: โดยทั่วไปมีสามเหตุผลที่แต่ละคนจะต้องอยู่ภายใต้ความมุ่งมั่นตั้งใจพลเรือนภายใต้กฎเกณฑ์ที่ทันสมัย ในกรณีที่มีความเจ็บป่วยทางจิตที่เป็นภัยกับตัวเองหรือผู้อื่นกำหนดมาตรฐานความมุ่งมั่นทั่วไปเกือบทุกรัฐ construing ไม่สามารถที่จะให้สำหรับความต้องการขั้นพื้นฐานของคนที่เป็นภัยต่อตัวเอง ในแง่ของกระบวนการทุกรัฐให้การได้ยินที่เหมาะสมที่จะให้คำปรึกษาและการทบทวนการพิจารณาคดีเป็นระยะในขณะที่รัฐส่วนใหญ่มีคุณภาพมาตรฐานตามกฎหมายสำหรับสภาพแวดล้อมการรักษาและการรักษาในโรงพยาบาล

ที่มา: ราล์ฟ Reisner, คริสโต Slobogin และ Arti เชียงราย, กฎหมายและระบบสุขภาพจิต: ด้านประมวลกฎหมายแพ่งและกฎหมายอาญา (2009), pp 704-705

คำหลัก:

กฎหมายสุขภาพจิต

The cops did show up at his place, but I don't see how they could search his place with no warrant. I think if you are a 5150 in California, they can apprehend you, but there is a procedure I would suspect. But, he's still got rights if he has not broken any law. I'm not sure if there is ever a defense against a determined psycho. It's a serious problem with the human race, as weapons could fall into the hands of one, I mean nukes and such. He was completely bonkers, too.

That does bring up the question: at what point does an insane person lose rights, what rights do they lose, and who decides?

I actually have some life experience with committal hearings. Supported a good friend who has an issue with a relative. They are a fucking joke.

 

[pawz]

The dude was a psycho. It's a mental health issue, not a gender issue or a gun issue.

But NOC about mental health in America...

GlaxoSmithKline and Pfizer care. No really, THEY do.

 

[sarktastic]

The cops did show up at his place, but I don't see how they could search his place with no warrant. I think if you are a 5150 in California, they can apprehend you, but there is a procedure I would suspect. But, he's still got rights if he has not broken any law. I'm not sure if there is ever a defense against a determined psycho. It's a serious problem with the human race, as weapons could fall into the hands of one, I mean nukes and such. He was completely bonkers, too.

That does bring up the question: at what point does an insane person lose rights, what rights do they lose, and who decides?

for the record, that was post #6,666 for Mick

If that doesn't make you stop and say, "Fuck, man"... you really need to take a walk with the wife and get some perspective.

 

[sarktastic]

The dude was a psycho. It's a mental health issue, not a gender issue or a gun issue.

But NOC about mental health in America...

GlaxoSmithKline and Pfizer care. No really, THEY do.

... which is why they have a 1-800# you can call if you can't afford their drugs. They will only charge you the cash you have left, subsidizing it by overcharging those with the best prescription drug insurance.