So now that we know Pete isn't the answer...

Silly idiots! Have some fuckin logic and consistency in your arguments! Only consistency is fire everyone! It's not that simple! It never is!!!
 
Last edited:
Remember when DJ went undefeated every year?

Me either.

Year 3 tells the tale.

So you think he's going to suddenly fix all his flaws next year?

Please, tell us how this will happen.

I think we're better this year than last.

I'm hoping it'll continue.
 
Remember when DJ went undefeated every year?

Me either.

Year 3 tells the tale.

So you think he's going to suddenly fix all his flaws next year?

Please, tell us how this will happen.

I think we're better this year than last.

I'm hoping it'll continue.

I remember when you used to believe in actual results instead of incremental progress.

When did you turn Doog?
 
Silly idiots! Have some fuckin logic and consistency in your arguments! Only consistency is fire everyone! It's not that simple! It never is!!!

If the coaches aren't good enough, you fire them and try again.

It is that simple and it always is.
 
I'm not all the way to fire him yet, close, but I will be if he doesn't give SmithFS a shove into oncoming traffic on one of these upcoming road trips. If he retains Smith into the off-season, I am done. The offense has been Petersens achilles heal for four years in a row now, if he doesn't change it with an upgrade he is doomed.
 
Agree but if you think the coaches aren't good enough because they don't recruit oline or dbs then you have to allow the subsequent staff a small period of time to fix those issues before you conclude they too suck! Logic is a must and it's sorely lacking here at times.

Sark was a mess but he left the program with the same lack of depth he inherited. A better mindset maybe but no depth and no talent at oline, db, qb, WR, and no heart or will to improve and work at your craft. It wasn't an overnight fix and it's laughable that so many can't see that.
 
Agree but if you think the coaches aren't good enough because they don't recruit oline or dbs then you have to allow the subsequent staff a small period of time to fix those issues before you conclude they too suck! Logic is a must and it's sorely lacking here at times.

Sark was a mess but he left the program with the same lack of depth he inherited. A better mindset maybe but no depth and no talent at oline, db, qb, WR, and no heart or will to improve and work at your craft. It wasn't an overnight fix and it's laughable that so many can't see that.

We're not asking for Peterman to have solved everything overnight and win the Rose Bowl in year two.

We're just asking for him to beat shitty teams at home. Some of you need to learn the difference.

Sark went 9-9 his first two years. Peterman needs to go 4-2 just to keep up.
 
Agree but if you think the coaches aren't good enough because they don't recruit oline or dbs then you have to allow the subsequent staff a small period of time to fix those issues before you conclude they too suck! Logic is a must and it's sorely lacking here at times.

Sark was a mess but he left the program with the same lack of depth he inherited. A better mindset maybe but no depth and no talent at oline, db, qb, WR, and no heart or will to improve and work at your craft. It wasn't an overnight fix and it's laughable that so many can't see that.

Petersen has made a bunch of stupid coaching decisions, that is the point. His last chance with me is whether or not he can jettison Smith and fix the offense.
 
Agree but if you think the coaches aren't good enough because they don't recruit oline or dbs then you have to allow the subsequent staff a small period of time to fix those issues before you conclude they too suck! Logic is a must and it's sorely lacking here at times.

Sark was a mess but he left the program with the same lack of depth he inherited. A better mindset maybe but no depth and no talent at oline, db, qb, WR, and no heart or will to improve and work at your craft. It wasn't an overnight fix and it's laughable that so many can't see that.

The players who played yesterday were good enough to win the game.
 
I disagree they were good enough to win. The best player on the field was VAJ. By far. We have no one in his ballpark yet. And he was the QB of the bad guys. It makes it tough to win when the opposing Qb is that much better than everyone else on the field.

It's hard for some to admit but sometimes the other team is just more talented. They were. And not just at QB. We will get there but we aren't there yet.

It's not always in game coaching. That's the easy answer but in this case we need more talent made for the system. Sark had limited talent and no real system but we have a chance at both now.
 
I disagree they were good enough to win. The best player on the field was VAJ. By far.

CHRIST.

I stopped reading here. Dude completed 14 passes and had 8 carries for 12 yards.

Gaskin was the best offensive player on the field. Giving him just 18 carries was criminal stupidity.
 
Last edited:
I disagree they were good enough to win. The best player on the field was VAJ. By far.

CHRIST.

I stopped reading here. Dude completed 14 passes and had 8 carries for 12 yards.

Gaskin was the best offensive player on the field. Giving him just 18 carries was criminal stupidity.

You just went full Doog.

Love,
Royce.
 
Agree but if you think the coaches aren't good enough because they don't recruit oline or dbs then you have to allow the subsequent staff a small period of time to fix those issues before you conclude they too suck! Logic is a must and it's sorely lacking here at times.

Sark was a mess but he left the program with the same lack of depth he inherited. A better mindset maybe but no depth and no talent at oline, db, qb, WR, and no heart or will to improve and work at your craft. It wasn't an overnight fix and it's laughable that so many can't see that.

Petersen has made a bunch of stupid coaching decisions, that is the point. His last chance with me is whether or not he can jettison Smith and fix the offense.

You mean like when Sark hired Wilcox?
 
I disagree they were good enough to win. The best player on the field was VAJ. By far.

CHRIST.

I stopped reading here. Dude completed 14 passes and had 8 carries for 12 yards.

Gaskin was the best offensive player on the field. Giving him just 18 carries was criminal stupidity.

You just went full Doog.

Love,
Royce.

18 for 155 >>> 27 for 138.

I was just as surprised as you.
 
Back
Top