Slow news day?

[thechatch]

But of course.

Can’t beat him legitimately, so throw him in jail on bogus indictments.
——

@kylegriffin1
New on
@MSNBC
: The Trump case has been assigned to U.S. District Judge Tanya S. Chutkan.

Chutkan, an Obama appointee, is the only federal judge in Washington, D.C. who has sentenced Jan. 6 defendants to sentences longer than the government had requested

You haven’t read the indictment. Of course.

You haven't read anything other than CNN headlines

I’ve been working my way through the indictment, Sally.

You should too. But you won’t.

No you haven’t. You’re full of shit, as always.

 

[Sledog]

Indictment is fantasyland. He threatened Pence with the crowd? That's funny.

 

[EverettChris]

I’m sure she’ll recuse herself.
https://twitter.com/JustTheNews/status/1686777004090077184?s=20

 

[Bob_C]

Curious for the legal scholars on this thread, why wasn't he indicted for incitement of the events on J6 that the committee told us were really really bad and he did it? Was that an illusion? Thanks in advance.

 

[HHusky]

Curious for the legal scholars on this thread, why wasn't he indicted for incitement of the events on J6 that the committee told us were really really bad and he did it? Was that an illusion? Thanks in advance.

Any answer would be speculation, but I'd guess Smith was trying to take away the argument that his prosecution was intended to disqualify Daddy under the 14th Amendment.

 

[WestlinnDuck]

Curious for the legal scholars on this thread, why wasn't he indicted for incitement of the events on J6 that the committee told us were really really bad and he did it? Was that an illusion? Thanks in advance.

You mean why Ray Epps who was on the ground saying "We need to go into the Capitol" wasn't indicted? Ask the dazzler. Why weren't antifa/blm leaders indicted for inciting and funding violent protest during Trump's inauguration? I have no problem with indicting people who entered the Capitol as long as that it also applies to dem groups who invade the Capitol and that the sentences are proportionate. The summer of love riots had the full support of almost every dem Congressman and Blue State governors and city mayors.

 

[Bob_C]

Curious for the legal scholars on this thread, why wasn't he indicted for incitement of the events on J6 that the committee told us were really really bad and he did it? Was that an illusion? Thanks in advance.

You mean why Ray Epps who was on the ground saying "We need to go into the Capitol" wasn't indicted? Ask the dazzler. Why weren't antifa/blm leaders indicted for inciting and funding violent protest during Trump's inauguration? I have no problem with indicting people who entered the Capitol as long as that it also applies to dem groups who invade the Capitol and that the sentences are proportionate. The summer of love riots had the full support of almost every dem Congressman and Blue State governors and city mayors.

Your answer gets to basically what I think the reason is. Charge him for incitement in relation to the riot and the riot itself is on the table for actual examination.

 

[WestlinnDuck]

Curious for the legal scholars on this thread, why wasn't he indicted for incitement of the events on J6 that the committee told us were really really bad and he did it? Was that an illusion? Thanks in advance.

You mean why Ray Epps who was on the ground saying "We need to go into the Capitol" wasn't indicted? Ask the dazzler. Why weren't antifa/blm leaders indicted for inciting and funding violent protest during Trump's inauguration? I have no problem with indicting people who entered the Capitol as long as that it also applies to dem groups who invade the Capitol and that the sentences are proportionate. The summer of love riots had the full support of almost every dem Congressman and Blue State governors and city mayors.

Your answer gets to basically what I think the reason is. Charge him for incitement in relation to the riot and the riot itself is on the table for actual examination.

You need to prove incitement. Asking for a peaceful protest with no mention of going into the Capitol Building isn't incitement and is protected as free speech. Where is Ray Epps? Complaining because you think the election was stolen (it was) can't be incitement if it's okay for major dem politicians to make the false claim that every Republican presidential victory since 2000 was stolen.

 

[RaceBannon]

Curious for the legal scholars on this thread, why wasn't he indicted for incitement of the events on J6 that the committee told us were really really bad and he did it? Was that an illusion? Thanks in advance.

Any answer would be speculation, but I'd guess Smith was trying to take away the argument that his prosecution was intended to disqualify Daddy under the 14th Amendment.

And yet

You suck at this

 

[Bob_C]

Curious for the legal scholars on this thread, why wasn't he indicted for incitement of the events on J6 that the committee told us were really really bad and he did it? Was that an illusion? Thanks in advance.

Any answer would be speculation, but I'd guess Smith was trying to take away the argument that his prosecution was intended to disqualify Daddy under the 14th Amendment.

Then frame it as inciting a riot and not an insurrection. We had a whole committee last summer that thought this was a big deal and that did a criminal referral over the capitol riot incitement.

 

[Blueduck]

Question #1
Wasn't Trump acquitted by the Senate in the second impeachment concerning Jan 6 insurrection.
Question #2
Are we crossing into double Jeopardy with this new indictment?
(Asking for a fren)

 

[Bob_C]

https://twitter.com/andrewhclark/status/1686848265302704129?s=46&t=TF5YSHjB9Hq6ZBrenucnTg

 

[HHusky]

Curious for the legal scholars on this thread, why wasn't he indicted for incitement of the events on J6 that the committee told us were really really bad and he did it? Was that an illusion? Thanks in advance.

Any answer would be speculation, but I'd guess Smith was trying to take away the argument that his prosecution was intended to disqualify Daddy under the 14th Amendment.

Then frame it as inciting a riot and not an insurrection. We had a whole committee last summer that thought this was a big deal and that did a criminal referral over the capitol riot incitement.

Is "inciting a riot" even a federal crime?

 

[Bob_C]

Curious for the legal scholars on this thread, why wasn't he indicted for incitement of the events on J6 that the committee told us were really really bad and he did it? Was that an illusion? Thanks in advance.

Any answer would be speculation, but I'd guess Smith was trying to take away the argument that his prosecution was intended to disqualify Daddy under the 14th Amendment.

Then frame it as inciting a riot and not an insurrection. We had a whole committee last summer that thought this was a big deal and that did a criminal referral over the capitol riot incitement.

Is "inciting a riot" even a federal crime?

Who could say. I heard a lot of hot incitement talk for two years. Maybe that was a dud?

 

[thechatch]

Curious for the legal scholars on this thread, why wasn't he indicted for incitement of the events on J6 that the committee told us were really really bad and he did it? Was that an illusion? Thanks in advance.

Any answer would be speculation, but I'd guess Smith was trying to take away the argument that his prosecution was intended to disqualify Daddy under the 14th Amendment.

Then frame it as inciting a riot and not an insurrection. We had a whole committee last summer that thought this was a big deal and that did a criminal referral over the capitol riot incitement.

Is "inciting a riot" even a federal crime?

It wasn’t earlier in 2020 in Kenosha, Portland, Seattle, Chicago, LA, NYC, Baltimore…etc…etc…etc

 

[HHusky]

Curious for the legal scholars on this thread, why wasn't he indicted for incitement of the events on J6 that the committee told us were really really bad and he did it? Was that an illusion? Thanks in advance.

Any answer would be speculation, but I'd guess Smith was trying to take away the argument that his prosecution was intended to disqualify Daddy under the 14th Amendment.

Then frame it as inciting a riot and not an insurrection. We had a whole committee last summer that thought this was a big deal and that did a criminal referral over the capitol riot incitement.

Is "inciting a riot" even a federal crime?

Who could say. I heard a lot of hot incitement talk for two years. Maybe that was a dud?

In connection with insurrection. But I guess he wasn't charged with everything he could have been so . . . WINNING!

 

[Bob_C]

Curious for the legal scholars on this thread, why wasn't he indicted for incitement of the events on J6 that the committee told us were really really bad and he did it? Was that an illusion? Thanks in advance.

Any answer would be speculation, but I'd guess Smith was trying to take away the argument that his prosecution was intended to disqualify Daddy under the 14th Amendment.

Then frame it as inciting a riot and not an insurrection. We had a whole committee last summer that thought this was a big deal and that did a criminal referral over the capitol riot incitement.

Is "inciting a riot" even a federal crime?

Who could say. I heard a lot of hot incitement talk for two years. Maybe that was a dud?

In connection with insurrection. But I guess he wasn't charged with everything he could have been so . . . WINNING!

Yeah I'm sure it's just a kinder gentler justice department.

 

[HHusky]

Curious for the legal scholars on this thread, why wasn't he indicted for incitement of the events on J6 that the committee told us were really really bad and he did it? Was that an illusion? Thanks in advance.

Any answer would be speculation, but I'd guess Smith was trying to take away the argument that his prosecution was intended to disqualify Daddy under the 14th Amendment.

Then frame it as inciting a riot and not an insurrection. We had a whole committee last summer that thought this was a big deal and that did a criminal referral over the capitol riot incitement.

Is "inciting a riot" even a federal crime?

Who could say. I heard a lot of hot incitement talk for two years. Maybe that was a dud?

In connection with insurrection. But I guess he wasn't charged with everything he could have been so . . . WINNING!

Yeah I'm sure it's just a kinder gentler justice department.

Does anyone really need Daddy to spend seven lifetimes in prison?

 

[thechatch]

Curious for the legal scholars on this thread, why wasn't he indicted for incitement of the events on J6 that the committee told us were really really bad and he did it? Was that an illusion? Thanks in advance.

Any answer would be speculation, but I'd guess Smith was trying to take away the argument that his prosecution was intended to disqualify Daddy under the 14th Amendment.

Then frame it as inciting a riot and not an insurrection. We had a whole committee last summer that thought this was a big deal and that did a criminal referral over the capitol riot incitement.

Is "inciting a riot" even a federal crime?

Who could say. I heard a lot of hot incitement talk for two years. Maybe that was a dud?

In connection with insurrection. But I guess he wasn't charged with everything he could have been so . . . WINNING!

Yeah I'm sure it's just a kinder gentler justice department.

Does anyone really need Daddy to spend seven lifetimes in prison?

Besides you and Mello?

 

[46XiJCAB]

Poor Dazzler, he actually believes that these indictments are intended to bring about convictions.

Tangle Trump up in the courts, destroy RDS with lies about FDOE curriculum.

The stupid will believe anything. Meaning DIM voters.

Right now even with the corrupt media running interference for the criminal in the WH and doing everything they can to destroy the top-2 GOP hopefuls, both are in dead heats with the criminal.

The DIMS always go a bridge too far. It isn’t working Dazzler.