She obviously testified to some hearsay. This isn't a trial.
That said, she had firsthand knowledge:
1. that Daddy knew there were guns and other weapons in the crowd; You think? Funny how none of them were used except for the fire extinguisher to kill Sicknick.[/b]
2. that Daddy knew these were his people, not Antifa, BLM, et al.; Because antifa and blm riots were okay? How many molotov cocktails were thrown to burn down the capitol? Who were the black clad dudes leading the charge into the Capitol[/b]
3. that the violence was expected and desired by Daddy and his circle, days in advance of Jan. 6;
4. that Daddy did want to go to the Capitol to oversee his coup and intended to; and Link? Funny if he wanted to go to the Capitol you would think he would have told the crowd to meet him there. [/b]
5. that Daddy did not want the violence stopped (and hoped Pence might be found by the mob?). Evidence? We know that Pelosi didn't want the Capitol secured and neither did the National Guard or the FBI and Ray Epps. Maybe he was "receptive" to Pence being found by the mob. Just no evidence. [/b]
You would think that an honest investigation might raise these point along with the hidden footage. I pity your mythical clients.
1. Multiple weapons were used by the rioters, Gasbag. The problem is you, not the availability of this information.
2. I guess this is supposed to be responsive, but I do have to guess.
3. I guess there's no disagreement.
4. You don't think Daddy told the crowd he'd be at the Capitol? You should really check the tape.
5. So it's not the fault of the guy who sent the armed mob. Everyone else should have stopped them. (Things 5-year-olds say.)