She defends pedophiles and the Senate Rats protect her

WaPo Ed. Board says Republicans treating Jackson worse than Kavanaugh was treated.

Clearly
Click to expand...

Needs to clarify that she likes beer.
Click to expand...

Needs to produce alibis from 20 years ago to prove she's not a rapist. Guilty until proven innocent.
 
http://twitter.com/NoLieWithBTC/status/1507088502059675649?t=D1xnPEX7QUj78G0Z_-8wiA&s=19
Click to expand...

Most qualified? Yes qualified means black woman that she can't define.

And no lie... uh uh uh
 
Last edited:
Cocaine Mitch is a no vote. Jackson isn’t remotely qualified. Her non-answers and inability to define a woman disqualify her. She’s nothing more than your typical leftist radical posing as an unbiased jurist.
 
uuxxjgw7rtma.png
 
Herr Dazzler loves to protect abusers. Why? What's in it for him?

cmbphex2lv8n.jpeg

They should get due process, a fair trial, and a sentence that fits the crime. Consuming is no different than producing. Her argument seems to be that in the past a pedo had to get physical pictures so it was harder to collect a lot. Now the internet makes it easier to get thousands of pictures so without the internet, the pedo wouldn't have as many. Or maybe even none. So they should get a lighter sentence. Solid.
 
Last edited:
Herr Dazzler loves to protect abusers. Why? What's in it for him?

View attachment 48699

They should get due process, a fair trial, and a sentence that fits the crime. Consuming is no different than producing. Her argument seems to be that in the past a pedo had to get physical pictures so it was harder to collect a lot. Now the internet makes it easier to get thousands of pictures so without the internet, the pedo wouldn't have as many. Or maybe even none. So they should get a lighter sentence. Solid.
Click to expand...

So, the demand for child porn goes up so more child porn is made which requires more children involved with, as the dazzler put it, "sick images". Definitely, deserving of materially lighter sentencing. Just don't make is some moral issue. Think of the real victim.
 
Herr Dazzler loves to protect abusers. Why? What's in it for him?

View attachment 48699

They should get due process, a fair trial, and a sentence that fits the crime. Consuming is no different than producing. Her argument seems to be that in the past a pedo had to get physical pictures so it was harder to collect a lot. Now the internet makes it easier to get thousands of pictures so without the internet, the pedo wouldn't have as many. Or maybe even none. So they should get a lighter sentence. Solid.
Click to expand...

So, the demand for child porn goes up so more child porn is made which requires more children involved with, as the dazzler put it, "sick images". Definitely, deserving of materially lighter sentencing. Just don't make is some moral issue. Think of the real victim.
Click to expand...

The real victim, you mean the black pedophile?
 
Herr Dazzler loves to protect abusers. Why? What's in it for him?

View attachment 48699

They should get due process, a fair trial, and a sentence that fits the crime. Consuming is no different than producing. Her argument seems to be that in the past a pedo had to get physical pictures so it was harder to collect a lot. Now the internet makes it easier to get thousands of pictures so without the internet, the pedo wouldn't have as many. Or maybe even none. So they should get a lighter sentence. Solid.
Click to expand...

So, the demand for child porn goes up so more child porn is made which requires more children involved with, as the dazzler put it, "sick images". Definitely, deserving of materially lighter sentencing. Just don't make is some moral issue. Think of the real victim.
Click to expand...

The real victim, you mean the black pedophile?
Click to expand...

Black or white. That's Jackson's view. She is a pedo apologist.
 
Herr Dazzler loves to protect abusers. Why? What's in it for him?

View attachment 48699

They should get due process, a fair trial, and a sentence that fits the crime. Consuming is no different than producing. Her argument seems to be that in the past a pedo had to get physical pictures so it was harder to collect a lot. Now the internet makes it easier to get thousands of pictures so without the internet, the pedo wouldn't have as many. Or maybe even none. So they should get a lighter sentence. Solid.
Click to expand...

So, the demand for child porn goes up so more child porn is made which requires more children involved with, as the dazzler put it, "sick images". Definitely, deserving of materially lighter sentencing. Just don't make is some moral issue. Think of the real victim.
Click to expand...

You noticed Herr Dazzlers softening of the description too. He can’t say child pornography. It gets characterized as “sick images”. The same as a picture of a pile of dog shit.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top