SEC defense purplej

[EsophagealFeces]

Explain the conference records in BCS bowls.

Explain these records from 1998 through 2011:

SEC vs. PAC-12 regular season: 10-12

SEC vs. PAC-12 bowl games: 1-0

SEC vs. Big 12 regular season: 6-10

SEC vs. Big 12 bowl games: 21-8

SEC vs. ACC regular season: 42-36

SEC vs. ACC bowl games: 16-9

SEC vs. Big 10 regular season: 7-4

SEC vs. Big 10 bowl games: 19-19

SEC vs. Big East regular season: 16-15

SEC vs. Big East bowl game: 3-8

BOOM

Good stuff Billy. They have had dominant teams at the top, but after the top 2-3, the conference is no different from any other. Every year teams like South Carolina, Georgia, Texas A&M, Ole Miss, and whatever other team backs into a 9-4 season get overrated. I've never seen a team get as lucky as Auburn did last year and Missouri making the SEC title game last year spoke volumes.

Alabama will always be great with Saban, LSU is always one of the most talented teams, and Florida was great under Urban Meyer. Auburn might be able to get into the conversation with Malzahn. The rest of the teams pretty much suck.

Other than Seattle and San Francisco, the NFC West was just like every other NFL division last year.

It's the top end of the SEC that makes the difference. We all know the bottom half sucks, but no one cares.

Disagree. You're discounting how good the Cardinals are. They would have won the NFC North and had a shot at the East and South. The Rams were dreck on offense, but their defense is outstanding. The NFL-NCAA comparison doesn't really work there because conference play is 9/12 of your games in college, but only 6/16 in the NFL. The strength of your division/conference makes a bigger difference in college than the NFL, good or bad.

 

[TierbsHsotBoobs]

Explain the conference records in BCS bowls.

Explain these records from 1998 through 2011:

SEC vs. PAC-12 regular season: 10-12

SEC vs. PAC-12 bowl games: 1-0

SEC vs. Big 12 regular season: 6-10

SEC vs. Big 12 bowl games: 21-8

SEC vs. ACC regular season: 42-36

SEC vs. ACC bowl games: 16-9

SEC vs. Big 10 regular season: 7-4

SEC vs. Big 10 bowl games: 19-19

SEC vs. Big East regular season: 16-15

SEC vs. Big East bowl game: 3-8

BOOM

Good stuff Billy. They have had dominant teams at the top, but after the top 2-3, the conference is no different from any other. Every year teams like South Carolina, Georgia, Texas A&M, Ole Miss, and whatever other team backs into a 9-4 season get overrated. I've never seen a team get as lucky as Auburn did last year and Missouri making the SEC title game last year spoke volumes.

Alabama will always be great with Saban, LSU is always one of the most talented teams, and Florida was great under Urban Meyer. Auburn might be able to get into the conversation with Malzahn. The rest of the teams pretty much suck.

Other than Seattle and San Francisco, the NFC West was just like every other NFL division last year.

It's the top end of the SEC that makes the difference. We all know the bottom half sucks, but no one cares.

Disagree. You're discounting how good the Cardinals are. They would have won the NFC North and had a shot at the East and South. The Rams were dreck on offense, but their defense is outstanding. The NFL-NCAA comparison doesn't really work there because conference play is 9/12 of your games in college, but only 6/16 in the NFL. The strength of your division/conference makes a bigger difference in college than the NFL, good or bad.

Holy crap Tequilla, you took that Sarkasm way too seriously.

 

[Fire_Marshall_Bill]

It's funny how all the Pac Twoolves suddenly grow bolder the year that the SEC doesn't win the title.

Another whoosh

I've been watching the SEC since they had ten teams and TBS (as in the TV station) showed their gaymes on Sat. mornings in the 80s. They were a respectable conference, nothing more. In fact I remember some Bammer v. LSU games for the conference lead in which both teams were ranked in the teens. 1988 or thereabouts. Even in the late 90s Bammer was terrible, and I remember Danny Waffle (a worse Heisman than Gino Torretta) and the Gaytors getting drilled by Tommy Frazier in the party bowel.

This "success" is a recent, ovehyped, and short-lived phenomenon. Don't act like CBS and ESPN's multi billion dollar deals have nothing to do with it either. It's already fading fast. Look at how South Carolina was absolutely annihilated. Real Top 10 teams rarely play like that... Maybe once out of every 40 times.

 

[RoadDawg55]

Explain the conference records in BCS bowls.

Explain these records from 1998 through 2011:

SEC vs. PAC-12 regular season: 10-12

SEC vs. PAC-12 bowl games: 1-0

SEC vs. Big 12 regular season: 6-10

SEC vs. Big 12 bowl games: 21-8

SEC vs. ACC regular season: 42-36

SEC vs. ACC bowl games: 16-9

SEC vs. Big 10 regular season: 7-4

SEC vs. Big 10 bowl games: 19-19

SEC vs. Big East regular season: 16-15

SEC vs. Big East bowl game: 3-8

BOOM

Good stuff Billy. They have had dominant teams at the top, but after the top 2-3, the conference is no different from any other. Every year teams like South Carolina, Georgia, Texas A&M, Ole Miss, and whatever other team backs into a 9-4 season get overrated. I've never seen a team get as lucky as Auburn did last year and Missouri making the SEC title game last year spoke volumes.

Alabama will always be great with Saban, LSU is always one of the most talented teams, and Florida was great under Urban Meyer. Auburn might be able to get into the conversation with Malzahn. The rest of the teams pretty much suck.

Other than Seattle and San Francisco, the NFC West was just like every other NFL division last year.

It's the top end of the SEC that makes the difference. We all know the bottom half sucks, but no one cares.

No, all four teams in the NFC West were good. Arizona went 10-6. That wins the division in some other divisions.

I don't agree with PLSS or Billy. I think and have always said the SEC has been the best conference in recent years. Bill's numbers show that it's not as great as Purple J thinks either. The answer is in the middle.

 

[PurpleJ]

Explain the conference records in BCS bowls.

Explain these records from 1998 through 2011:

SEC vs. PAC-12 regular season: 10-12

SEC vs. PAC-12 bowl games: 1-0

SEC vs. Big 12 regular season: 6-10

SEC vs. Big 12 bowl games: 21-8

SEC vs. ACC regular season: 42-36

SEC vs. ACC bowl games: 16-9

SEC vs. Big 10 regular season: 7-4

SEC vs. Big 10 bowl games: 19-19

SEC vs. Big East regular season: 16-15

SEC vs. Big East bowl game: 3-8

BOOM

Good stuff Billy. They have had dominant teams at the top, but after the top 2-3, the conference is no different from any other. Every year teams like South Carolina, Georgia, Texas A&M, Ole Miss, and whatever other team backs into a 9-4 season get overrated. I've never seen a team get as lucky as Auburn did last year and Missouri making the SEC title game last year spoke volumes.

Alabama will always be great with Saban, LSU is always one of the most talented teams, and Florida was great under Urban Meyer. Auburn might be able to get into the conversation with Malzahn. The rest of the teams pretty much suck.

Other than Seattle and San Francisco, the NFC West was just like every other NFL division last year.

It's the top end of the SEC that makes the difference. We all know the bottom half sucks, but no one cares.

No, all four teams in the NFC West were good. Arizona went 10-6. That wins the division in some other divisions.

I don't agree with PLSS or Billy. I think and have always said the SEC has been the best conference in recent years. Bill's numbers show that it's not as great as Purple J thinks either. The answer is in the middle.

Obviously I've been going wayyyyy over the top to fuck with certain poasters. HTH

 

[Fire_Marshall_Bill]

Explain the conference records in BCS bowls.

Explain these records from 1998 through 2011:

SEC vs. PAC-12 regular season: 10-12

SEC vs. PAC-12 bowl games: 1-0

SEC vs. Big 12 regular season: 6-10

SEC vs. Big 12 bowl games: 21-8

SEC vs. ACC regular season: 42-36

SEC vs. ACC bowl games: 16-9

SEC vs. Big 10 regular season: 7-4

SEC vs. Big 10 bowl games: 19-19

SEC vs. Big East regular season: 16-15

SEC vs. Big East bowl game: 3-8

BOOM

Good stuff Billy. They have had dominant teams at the top, but after the top 2-3, the conference is no different from any other. Every year teams like South Carolina, Georgia, Texas A&M, Ole Miss, and whatever other team backs into a 9-4 season get overrated. I've never seen a team get as lucky as Auburn did last year and Missouri making the SEC title game last year spoke volumes.

Alabama will always be great with Saban, LSU is always one of the most talented teams, and Florida was great under Urban Meyer. Auburn might be able to get into the conversation with Malzahn. The rest of the teams pretty much suck.

Other than Seattle and San Francisco, the NFC West was just like every other NFL division last year.

It's the top end of the SEC that makes the difference. We all know the bottom half sucks, but no one cares.

No, all four teams in the NFC West were good. Arizona went 10-6. That wins the division in some other divisions.

I don't agree with PLSS or Billy. I think and have always said the SEC has been the best conference in recent years. Bill's numbers show that it's not as great as Purple J thinks either. The answer is in the middle.

Obviously I've been going wayyyyy over the top to fuck with certain poasters. HTH

Things people say when they get owned in arguments

 

[EsophagealFeces]

Explain the conference records in BCS bowls.

Explain these records from 1998 through 2011:

SEC vs. PAC-12 regular season: 10-12

SEC vs. PAC-12 bowl games: 1-0

SEC vs. Big 12 regular season: 6-10

SEC vs. Big 12 bowl games: 21-8

SEC vs. ACC regular season: 42-36

SEC vs. ACC bowl games: 16-9

SEC vs. Big 10 regular season: 7-4

SEC vs. Big 10 bowl games: 19-19

SEC vs. Big East regular season: 16-15

SEC vs. Big East bowl game: 3-8

BOOM

Good stuff Billy. They have had dominant teams at the top, but after the top 2-3, the conference is no different from any other. Every year teams like South Carolina, Georgia, Texas A&M, Ole Miss, and whatever other team backs into a 9-4 season get overrated. I've never seen a team get as lucky as Auburn did last year and Missouri making the SEC title game last year spoke volumes.

Alabama will always be great with Saban, LSU is always one of the most talented teams, and Florida was great under Urban Meyer. Auburn might be able to get into the conversation with Malzahn. The rest of the teams pretty much suck.

Other than Seattle and San Francisco, the NFC West was just like every other NFL division last year.

It's the top end of the SEC that makes the difference. We all know the bottom half sucks, but no one cares.

Disagree. You're discounting how good the Cardinals are. They would have won the NFC North and had a shot at the East and South. The Rams were dreck on offense, but their defense is outstanding. The NFL-NCAA comparison doesn't really work there because conference play is 9/12 of your games in college, but only 6/16 in the NFL. The strength of your division/conference makes a bigger difference in college than the NFL, good or bad.

Holy crap Tequilla, you took that Sarkasm way too seriously.

I missed that you bolded part of the poast you responded to, so I missed the Sarkasm. I have to give myself credit, I made a very good argument on why water is wet.

 

[PurpleJ]

Explain the conference records in BCS bowls.

Explain these records from 1998 through 2011:

SEC vs. PAC-12 regular season: 10-12

SEC vs. PAC-12 bowl games: 1-0

SEC vs. Big 12 regular season: 6-10

SEC vs. Big 12 bowl games: 21-8

SEC vs. ACC regular season: 42-36

SEC vs. ACC bowl games: 16-9

SEC vs. Big 10 regular season: 7-4

SEC vs. Big 10 bowl games: 19-19

SEC vs. Big East regular season: 16-15

SEC vs. Big East bowl game: 3-8

BOOM

Good stuff Billy. They have had dominant teams at the top, but after the top 2-3, the conference is no different from any other. Every year teams like South Carolina, Georgia, Texas A&M, Ole Miss, and whatever other team backs into a 9-4 season get overrated. I've never seen a team get as lucky as Auburn did last year and Missouri making the SEC title game last year spoke volumes.

Alabama will always be great with Saban, LSU is always one of the most talented teams, and Florida was great under Urban Meyer. Auburn might be able to get into the conversation with Malzahn. The rest of the teams pretty much suck.

Other than Seattle and San Francisco, the NFC West was just like every other NFL division last year.

It's the top end of the SEC that makes the difference. We all know the bottom half sucks, but no one cares.

No, all four teams in the NFC West were good. Arizona went 10-6. That wins the division in some other divisions.

I don't agree with PLSS or Billy. I think and have always said the SEC has been the best conference in recent years. Bill's numbers show that it's not as great as Purple J thinks either. The answer is in the middle.

Obviously I've been going wayyyyy over the top to fuck with certain poasters. HTH

Things people say when they get owned in arguments

Top tier of SEC > Top tier of every other conference

The top to bottom argument is for losers. The only thing that matters is winning championships, and it's embarrassing that you still don't get it.

 

[RoadDawg55]

Explain the conference records in BCS bowls.

Explain these records from 1998 through 2011:

SEC vs. PAC-12 regular season: 10-12

SEC vs. PAC-12 bowl games: 1-0

SEC vs. Big 12 regular season: 6-10

SEC vs. Big 12 bowl games: 21-8

SEC vs. ACC regular season: 42-36

SEC vs. ACC bowl games: 16-9

SEC vs. Big 10 regular season: 7-4

SEC vs. Big 10 bowl games: 19-19

SEC vs. Big East regular season: 16-15

SEC vs. Big East bowl game: 3-8

BOOM

Good stuff Billy. They have had dominant teams at the top, but after the top 2-3, the conference is no different from any other. Every year teams like South Carolina, Georgia, Texas A&M, Ole Miss, and whatever other team backs into a 9-4 season get overrated. I've never seen a team get as lucky as Auburn did last year and Missouri making the SEC title game last year spoke volumes.

Alabama will always be great with Saban, LSU is always one of the most talented teams, and Florida was great under Urban Meyer. Auburn might be able to get into the conversation with Malzahn. The rest of the teams pretty much suck.

Other than Seattle and San Francisco, the NFC West was just like every other NFL division last year.

It's the top end of the SEC that makes the difference. We all know the bottom half sucks, but no one cares.

Disagree. You're discounting how good the Cardinals are. They would have won the NFC North and had a shot at the East and South. The Rams were dreck on offense, but their defense is outstanding. The NFL-NCAA comparison doesn't really work there because conference play is 9/12 of your games in college, but only 6/16 in the NFL. The strength of your division/conference makes a bigger difference in college than the NFL, good or bad.

Holy crap Tequilla, you took that Sarkasm way too seriously.

I missed that you bolded part of the poast you responded to, so I missed the Sarkasm. I have to give myself credit, I made a very good argument on why water is wet.

Feces you worthless cunt, allow me to explain something to you. The Fire Marshal and I actually add something of value here. You're just part of the 81% of griswold.com refugees who go largely unnoticed here, moreover you wouldn't be missed if you diaff.

Pack up your shit, go and spend a special night buttfucking Timer while you guys formulate departure plans, and get on the fuck back to doogienights.com.

 

[no_uh]

Explain the conference records in BCS bowls.

Explain these records from 1998 through 2011:

SEC vs. PAC-12 regular season: 10-12

SEC vs. PAC-12 bowl games: 1-0

SEC vs. Big 12 regular season: 6-10

SEC vs. Big 12 bowl games: 21-8

SEC vs. ACC regular season: 42-36

SEC vs. ACC bowl games: 16-9

SEC vs. Big 10 regular season: 7-4

SEC vs. Big 10 bowl games: 19-19

SEC vs. Big East regular season: 16-15

SEC vs. Big East bowl game: 3-8

BOOM

QUIT LIVING IN THE PAST!!!!!

 

[RaceBannon]

Football stopped in 2011

 

[AZDuck]

Bill is SERIOUS! INTERNET!! sometimes

 

[Fire_Marshall_Bill]

Explain the conference records in BCS bowls.

Explain these records from 1998 through 2011:

SEC vs. PAC-12 regular season: 10-12

SEC vs. PAC-12 bowl games: 1-0

SEC vs. Big 12 regular season: 6-10

SEC vs. Big 12 bowl games: 21-8

SEC vs. ACC regular season: 42-36

SEC vs. ACC bowl games: 16-9

SEC vs. Big 10 regular season: 7-4

SEC vs. Big 10 bowl games: 19-19

SEC vs. Big East regular season: 16-15

SEC vs. Big East bowl game: 3-8

BOOM

Good stuff Billy. They have had dominant teams at the top, but after the top 2-3, the conference is no different from any other. Every year teams like South Carolina, Georgia, Texas A&M, Ole Miss, and whatever other team backs into a 9-4 season get overrated. I've never seen a team get as lucky as Auburn did last year and Missouri making the SEC title game last year spoke volumes.

Alabama will always be great with Saban, LSU is always one of the most talented teams, and Florida was great under Urban Meyer. Auburn might be able to get into the conversation with Malzahn. The rest of the teams pretty much suck.

Other than Seattle and San Francisco, the NFC West was just like every other NFL division last year.

It's the top end of the SEC that makes the difference. We all know the bottom half sucks, but no one cares.

No, all four teams in the NFC West were good. Arizona went 10-6. That wins the division in some other divisions.

I don't agree with PLSS or Billy. I think and have always said the SEC has been the best conference in recent years. Bill's numbers show that it's not as great as Purple J thinks either. The answer is in the middle.

Obviously I've been going wayyyyy over the top to fuck with certain poasters. HTH

Things people say when they get owned in arguments

Top tier of SEC > Top tier of every other conference

The top to bottom argument is for losers. The only thing that matters is winning championships, and it's embarrassing that you still don't get it.

Keep backtracking. I gave Florida and Alabama their credit. Care to explain the pedestrian records v. other conferences & the weak scheduling.

 

[PurpleJ]

Explain the conference records in BCS bowls.

Explain these records from 1998 through 2011:

SEC vs. PAC-12 regular season: 10-12

SEC vs. PAC-12 bowl games: 1-0

SEC vs. Big 12 regular season: 6-10

SEC vs. Big 12 bowl games: 21-8

SEC vs. ACC regular season: 42-36

SEC vs. ACC bowl games: 16-9

SEC vs. Big 10 regular season: 7-4

SEC vs. Big 10 bowl games: 19-19

SEC vs. Big East regular season: 16-15

SEC vs. Big East bowl game: 3-8

BOOM

Good stuff Billy. They have had dominant teams at the top, but after the top 2-3, the conference is no different from any other. Every year teams like South Carolina, Georgia, Texas A&M, Ole Miss, and whatever other team backs into a 9-4 season get overrated. I've never seen a team get as lucky as Auburn did last year and Missouri making the SEC title game last year spoke volumes.

Alabama will always be great with Saban, LSU is always one of the most talented teams, and Florida was great under Urban Meyer. Auburn might be able to get into the conversation with Malzahn. The rest of the teams pretty much suck.

Other than Seattle and San Francisco, the NFC West was just like every other NFL division last year.

It's the top end of the SEC that makes the difference. We all know the bottom half sucks, but no one cares.

No, all four teams in the NFC West were good. Arizona went 10-6. That wins the division in some other divisions.

I don't agree with PLSS or Billy. I think and have always said the SEC has been the best conference in recent years. Bill's numbers show that it's not as great as Purple J thinks either. The answer is in the middle.

Obviously I've been going wayyyyy over the top to fuck with certain poasters. HTH

Things people say when they get owned in arguments

Top tier of SEC > Top tier of every other conference

The top to bottom argument is for losers. The only thing that matters is winning championships, and it's embarrassing that you still don't get it.

Keep backtracking. I gave Florida and Alabama their credit. Care to explain the pedestrian records v. other conferences & the weak scheduling.

I don't need to. That's the whole point. Kiss the rings!

 

[Fire_Marshall_Bill]

Explain the conference records in BCS bowls.

Explain these records from 1998 through 2011:

SEC vs. PAC-12 regular season: 10-12

SEC vs. PAC-12 bowl games: 1-0

SEC vs. Big 12 regular season: 6-10

SEC vs. Big 12 bowl games: 21-8

SEC vs. ACC regular season: 42-36

SEC vs. ACC bowl games: 16-9

SEC vs. Big 10 regular season: 7-4

SEC vs. Big 10 bowl games: 19-19

SEC vs. Big East regular season: 16-15

SEC vs. Big East bowl game: 3-8

BOOM

Good stuff Billy. They have had dominant teams at the top, but after the top 2-3, the conference is no different from any other. Every year teams like South Carolina, Georgia, Texas A&M, Ole Miss, and whatever other team backs into a 9-4 season get overrated. I've never seen a team get as lucky as Auburn did last year and Missouri making the SEC title game last year spoke volumes.

Alabama will always be great with Saban, LSU is always one of the most talented teams, and Florida was great under Urban Meyer. Auburn might be able to get into the conversation with Malzahn. The rest of the teams pretty much suck.

Other than Seattle and San Francisco, the NFC West was just like every other NFL division last year.

It's the top end of the SEC that makes the difference. We all know the bottom half sucks, but no one cares.

No, all four teams in the NFC West were good. Arizona went 10-6. That wins the division in some other divisions.

I don't agree with PLSS or Billy. I think and have always said the SEC has been the best conference in recent years. Bill's numbers show that it's not as great as Purple J thinks either. The answer is in the middle.

Obviously I've been going wayyyyy over the top to fuck with certain poasters. HTH

Things people say when they get owned in arguments

Top tier of SEC > Top tier of every other conference

The top to bottom argument is for losers. The only thing that matters is winning championships, and it's embarrassing that you still don't get it.

Keep backtracking. I gave Florida and Alabama their credit. Care to explain the pedestrian records v. other conferences & the weak scheduling.

I don't need to. That's the whole point. Kiss the rings!

Actually you do. The weak schedules and average performance against other conferences including the f****** big east are a big part of the myth. You haven't seem to grasp that yet.

 

[oregonblitzkrieg]

If you want to shut the SEC up, beat them. Or shut up. And to Forced Sex University. Try doing it without help from the refs and cheating the law. Your rapist QB should have been behind bars eating a twinky weiner sandwich while watching his team get shellacked by Auburn.

 

[TierbsHsotBoobs]

If you want to shut the SEC up, beat them. Or shut up. And to Forced Sex University. Try doing it without help from the refs and cheating the law. Your rapist QB should have been behind bars eating a twinky weiner sandwich while watching his team get shellacked by Auburn.

The Quook is right, you know.

 

[dnc]

If you want to shut the SEC up, beat them. Or shut up. And to Forced Sex University. Try doing it without help from the refs and cheating the law. Your rapist QB should have been behind bars eating a twinky weiner sandwich while watching his team get shellacked by Auburn.

The Quook is right, you know.

The bolded part is right.

His latent butthurt FSU jealousy from last fall when he tried to argue Oregon deserved to be in the national title game over FSU, notsomuch.