Seattle Children's Hospital is so compromised. This is not normal.
- Thread starter DerekJohnson
- Start date
One of us didn't avoid the topic and it was me. All the dazzler does is ankle bite around the big issues and then claims that he tore out the jugular. Avoid, evade, obfuscate.
What kind of culture and society do you want to leave behind for future generations?
HHusky
New Fish
One that’s less outraged about stuff that really doesn’t matter much.
Yet you vote for the party that sells more outrage about stuff that really doesn't matter.
.
HHusky
New Fish
Neither party has a monopoly on any of this.
The kristol tweet was the example
Stupid much?
HHusky
New Fish
So, the conservative position would be that legislators, not doctors and patients, should be making medical decisions?
That's not recognizable as a conservative position, just so you know.
If this was supposed to show Kristol's principles have changed, it failed.
Child: "Do I have cancer doctor? Will I live?"
Dr.: " We'll get to that Timmy, but first, what arouses you most, this Barbie or Ken doll?"
The conservative position is to follow the science. Children are not adults. Some of us have better judgment at 18 than at age 12. Doctors have lost any moral position that they should have more input into medical science than a parent on gender transition. If the science showed a better outcome for sexual mutilation then you would have a point. Frankly I'm surprised that the insurance industry hasn't shut down sexual transition for minors. I would think that a malpractice insurance policy would exempt transition suits from minors who figure out they made a mistake.
No one gives a fuck about a conservative position retard
Kristol is one of your real conservatives who is taking liberal positions to make money
Children's hospital is wrong. Period
HHusky
New Fish
We could find some common ground here, but generalized broadsides at everyone with medical knowledge don't really advance any effort to "follow the science".
In most cases, following the science is pretty easy if you have a decent education in science, math, economics and history. Like how hard is it to follow the science that a mask with filter pores an order of magnitude larger than the aerosolised virus particle it is supposed to filter out don't work? Or look at how many healthy young adults are dying or getting seriously ill from the chicom crud before mandating an experimental non-vaccine? Or look at the outcomes in young people who undergo sexual transition? Or can figure out that printing money leads to inflation. The entire green grift is based on a failure to look at the actual science and this thing called opportunity cost.