Scott Brooks = shit coach

  • Thread starter Thread starter [Deleted User]
  • Start date Start date
Heck of a GS comeback going on. Can they finish?

NeedsMoreTime ‏@NegaDawg 5m
Steph Curry can't be ice cold the entire series can he?

Then immediately after he drills back to back 3's. Clippers have themselves to blame for this and Doc my #3 coach in the league went with Big Baby for way too long and it cost them some easy boards.
Curry shouldn't have forced that, surely they could have gotten a better shot there.

Today's era of basketball. Just wind the clock down and take a hero three, if it goes in you are the talk of the day.

Even Lebron settles for that and Durant too. Annoys me when stars do that.

Yeah the reliance on the 3 may be exciting to some but its become a hindrance to good fundamental offense. Thats why I like Memphis. They don't rely on the 3, they don't have a star, they play great defense and they have a versatile big man (Gasol) that is so much more skilled then a typical big man.

I think the Europeanization of the NBA is one explanation for the prevalence of the 3.
The three when used properly is a hell of a weapon. See Spurs, San Antonio.

Creating your own three is not using it properly though. Curry had a very unselfish night so I hate to bang on him too hard, but in a situation like that where you only need a two I'd probably put the ball in KlayKlay's hands where the defense has to respect that he can get you the bucket by putting it on the floor or pulling up at any time.

Memphis is my team, but their biggest weakness is their lack of three point shooting. It's at least improved from last season.

Game 4 is going to be huge. If Memphis can win that one and have a chance to close it out at home in game 5, I think we'll see an upset.

Only the NBA Finals were 2-3-2(now they are 2-2-1-1-1 starting this year again), the rest are 2-2-1-1-1.

Memphis big problem is they don't have a Super Star. In the NBA since 1980 if you don't have a super star you have a ceiling and can only go so far.

2004 Detroit is the only exception and they had 4 all-stars in their starting lineup plus Okur off the bench, great coaching and played a team who hated each other in the Finals.
Good poont, forgot it was 2-2-1-1-1.

Regardless, if Memphis has a chance to close it out at the Grindhouse (ILTCTFEFTGH) I like their chances. If OKC takes Game 4 I think the Zombie Sonics will win the series.

I agree Memphis won't be going all the way, but Mark Gasol is damn close to a superstar when it comes to actual on court ability. He doesn't have the star power, but what that guy brings at both ends of the court is massive. The only teams with #1 players I'd take over Gasol are Miami, OKC, and Indiana, and maybe San Antonio and Houston. Yes, I'd take him over any player in the Clippers-GS series.

Maybe I'm being a homer, but I love a guy who produces on both ends and doesn't have to be the focal point of the offense.

The only thing I'd like to see from him is being a little bit more aggressive on offense. He's great but I'll take the 35 from Blake Griffin over all the things he does.
 
Q: It’s a bad sign for Brooks that Russell Westbrook’s brother tweeted during Game 3 that OKC needs a new coach, right?

It’s certainly not a GOOD sign. Another not-so-great sign: Our ESPN comrade Brian Windhorst tweeting during Game 3, “Grizzlies know all of OKC’s plays. When the 1st option is taken away the Thunder just shut down their offense.” Well, that sounds like a problem. You know what else was a problem? My reaction to that tweet was, “The Thunder have plays?” Either way, we’ve clearly hit a fork-in-the-road moment for OKC’s franchise — similar to Miami falling behind 2-1 in the East semis to Indy, soaking in all the “They might be done” buzz, then laying the smack down (and then some) with LeBron and Wade’s otherworldly 70-27-15 combo game. Even though Wade was brilliant in that game, that was also the day when LeBron gently grabbed the steering wheel from Wade (and never relinquished it). I love watching Durant and Westbrook, but Westbrook’s overcompetitiveness — the trait you want 99 percent of the time — actually hurts Oklahoma City because he’s saying “I GOT THIS!” way too much.

Put it this way: At some point, Michael Jordan never had to worry about Scottie Pippen saying, “Hey, everybody, I got this!” When you have the greatest and most efficient scorer of an entire generation — and that’s Durant right now, by every calculation — do you really want one of his teammates saying “I got this!” just as frequently? It’s starting to feel more and more like Durant and Westbrook might need their own teams. But that’s the best thing about Game 4: They could flip that narrative with one monster game in Memphis. Do they have their own everyone-needs-to-shut-the-eff-up 70-27-15 lurking in them? Welcome to this weekend’s most fascinating subplot … well, other than Indiana having basketball’s first-ever collective nervous breakdown


From Simmons mailbag and I agree that besides Brooks being a shitty coach the roles of Durant-Westbrook isn't defined. Brooks needs to sit them both down and stress that down the stretch this is Duran'ts team. No if's and or buts about it.
 
Back
Top