School Shooting in Georgia.

@RaceBannon
I'm skeptical, but if mandatory buybacks are your proposed solution, tell me why.

I'm skeptical, but if mandatory buybacks are Kameltoe's proposed solution, tell us why. That is the actual issue.
No, it isn't. No mandatory buyback is going to pass Constitutional muster.
I understand you'd rather pick at the unserious proposals by Harris and ignore Daddy's unserious proposals. 'Cuz you're so concerned about substance is why.
 
image.png
 
@RaceBannon
I'm skeptical, but if mandatory buybacks are your proposed solution, tell me why.

I'm skeptical, but if mandatory buybacks are Kameltoe's proposed solution, tell us why. That is the actual issue.
No, it isn't. No mandatory buyback is going to pass Constitutional muster.
I understand you'd rather pick at the unserious proposals by Harris and ignore Daddy's unserious proposals. 'Cuz you're so concerned about substance is why.
Which of daddy's proposals do you consider unserious?
 
@RaceBannon
I'm skeptical, but if mandatory buybacks are your proposed solution, tell me why.

I'm skeptical, but if mandatory buybacks are Kameltoe's proposed solution, tell us why. That is the actual issue.
No, it isn't. No mandatory buyback is going to pass Constitutional muster.
I understand you'd rather pick at the unserious proposals by Harris and ignore Daddy's unserious proposals. 'Cuz you're so concerned about substance is why.
Which of daddy's proposals do you consider unserious?
Gonna pay for everyone's infertility treatments, as but one example.
 
Name some Ern
Don't play dumb with me, boy! You're aware of gun regulations.

But ban assault weapons, yes. That's a ban I support. I'm on the record.

bUt bUyBaCks!!! reeeee

Georgia
Georgia is nowhere near the most lax when it comes to gun laws. IL, CA, NJ, NY have some of the most strict gun laws in the country yet we all know what kind of violence takes place in those states.
Gun laws are of zero deterrence to criminals and we all know it. Blaming a gun for murdering someone is like blaming a pencil for a misspelling. Its fucking stupid.
 
Name some Ern
Don't play dumb with me, boy! You're aware of gun regulations.

But ban assault weapons, yes. That's a ban I support. I'm on the record.

bUt bUyBaCks!!! reeeee

Georgia
Georgia is nowhere near the most lax when it comes to gun laws. IL, CA, NJ, NY have some of the most strict gun laws in the country yet we all know what kind of violence takes place in those states.
Gun laws are of zero deterrence to criminals and we all know it. Blaming a gun for murdering someone is like blaming a pencil for a misspelling. Its fucking stupid.
The same could be said of nuclear bomb making materials.
Leave uranium alone!

image.png
 
@RaceBannon
I'm skeptical, but if mandatory buybacks are your proposed solution, tell me why.

I'm skeptical, but if mandatory buybacks are Kameltoe's proposed solution, tell us why. That is the actual issue.
No, it isn't. No mandatory buyback is going to pass Constitutional muster.
I understand you'd rather pick at the unserious proposals by Harris and ignore Daddy's unserious proposals. 'Cuz you're so concerned about substance is why.
Then why did she say she supports mandatory buybacks? The three dem Supreme Court justices would support it. Any new dem appointed Justice would support it. That and abortion would be enough motivation for the dems to expand the Court to get the vote they want if they controlled Congress and the Presidency.
 
@RaceBannon
I'm skeptical, but if mandatory buybacks are your proposed solution, tell me why.

I'm skeptical, but if mandatory buybacks are Kameltoe's proposed solution, tell us why. That is the actual issue.
No, it isn't. No mandatory buyback is going to pass Constitutional muster.
I understand you'd rather pick at the unserious proposals by Harris and ignore Daddy's unserious proposals. 'Cuz you're so concerned about substance is why.
Then why did she say she supports mandatory buybacks? The three dem Supreme Court justices would support it. Any new dem appointed Justice would support it. That and abortion would be enough motivation for the dems to expand the Court to get the vote they want if they controlled Congress and the Presidency.
Exactly, her proposals are unserious until they are serious, all it takes is a few newly added judges.
 
That's the position of the gal you're voting for
It's an easy question. Do you agree?
 
@RaceBannon
I'm skeptical, but if mandatory buybacks are your proposed solution, tell me why.

I'm skeptical, but if mandatory buybacks are Kameltoe's proposed solution, tell us why. That is the actual issue.
No, it isn't. No mandatory buyback is going to pass Constitutional muster.
I understand you'd rather pick at the unserious proposals by Harris and ignore Daddy's unserious proposals. 'Cuz you're so concerned about substance is why.
Why are you voting for unserious proposals? Name some serious ones
 
I'm not calling for regulations

You are
Hope this helps. Name some coward
 
Last edited:
Had Kamala jumped on government paid for IVF first it would be considered serious. Look no further than the media coverage of Vance's child tax credit proposal.
 
Apparently you and Ern just wanted to score political points on dead kids
Nice
 
Harris is I'm favor of mandatory buy backs. It's on video
Low info voter Ern
 
Back
Top