Schitff savaged by Patel!

Schiff needs to be behind bars for his part of the J6 destruction of evidence.
Biden’s flimsy blanket pardon for these criminals needs to be challenged all the way to SCOTUS.
Accepting a pardon is a de facto admission of guilt, and I do not find blanket pardons, signed by an autopen while Biden wasn’t (allegedly) even present, to be valid.
 
Schiff is the most dishonest and corrupt politician in years and that is saying a lot because the left has had a lot of them. The fact californians and democrats keep electing and supporting this piece of garbage says a lot about their lack of honesty, morals and integrity.
 
You don't cite evidence. Patel is a fucking dick obviously.
 
Last edited:
Cite evidence? Are you a complete shut-in idiot? The man has been caught lying so many times I question every single word that comes out of his mouth. Witness after witness has come forward revealing his leaking false information to the press on both the Kavanaugh case and of course russiagate which he repeatedly lied over and over again on msnbc, cnn, nbc, cbs and abc that he had actual proof of Trumps collusion.
The cruel and corrupt bastard leaked blase-ford's letter to the press, which then forced her to testify which she specifically said she had no interest in doing. This after he knew she was not a stable person with clear mental health issues which were clearly revealed during her testimony. Kavanaugh is a great, honest person, a father who loves his family and country and is imminently qualified to be on the SC, but to a POS like schiff, who hates All American, smart and decent people, he had to be taken down and destroyed.
schiff is the devil. Another democrat that you democrats support with your votes.
 
You're brainwashed. Cite a legit source. I don't care about trumptard brain dumps.
 
So you want a legit source that opines that Shiff is an idiot and liar?
 
You're brainwashed. Cite a legit source. I don't care about trumptard brain dumps.
Do your own research you dumbass. Its called educating yourself before posting your dumbass uneducated denials.
There are 1000's of articles detailing exactly what I said. Even from your lying lib media.
 
AOG illustrates how the democrats rely on absolute morons who only watch DNC approved news to keep the measly 20% they still have
Sad
 
You're brainwashed. Cite a legit source. I don't care about trumptard brain dumps.
Do your own research you dumbass. Its called educating yourself before posting your dumbass uneducated denials.
There are 1000's of articles detailing exactly what I said. Even from your lying lib media.
So, if there are 1000s of articles, post one.

Saying "Russian hoax" is a classic rhetorical fallacy. It is called the begging the question fallacy because the arguer is suggesting the conclusion of his argument in the premise. The fact is that the Trump campaign knew of the hack, they interacted with the Russians about it, and expected to benefit from stolen information. That's why there was an investigation. There was no impeachment due to insufficient evidence of conspiracy. For the 10 billionth time, there is no legal definition of "collusion" so if you say there was no collusion fuck it. It's meaningless. I'm tired of repeating this.
 
Last edited:
You're brainwashed. Cite a legit source. I don't care about trumptard brain dumps.
Do your own research you dumbass. Its called educating yourself before posting your dumbass uneducated denials.
There are 1000's of articles detailing exactly what I said. Even from your lying lib media.
So, if there are 1000s of articles, post one.

Saying "Russian hoax" is a classic rhetorical fallacy. It is called the begging the question fallacy because the arguer is suggesting the conclusion of his argument in the premise. The fact is that the Trump campaign knew of the hack, they interacted with the Russians about it, and expected to benefit from stolen information. That's why there was an investigation. There was no impeachment due to insufficient evidence of conspiracy. For the 10 billionth time, there is no legal definition of "collusion" so if you say there was no collusion fuck it. It's meaningless. I'm tired of repeating this.
Lets see the proof comrade.
 
You're brainwashed. Cite a legit source. I don't care about trumptard brain dumps.
Do your own research you dumbass. Its called educating yourself before posting your dumbass uneducated denials.
There are 1000's of articles detailing exactly what I said. Even from your lying lib media.
So, if there are 1000s of articles, post one.

Saying "Russian hoax" is a classic rhetorical fallacy. It is called the begging the question fallacy because the arguer is suggesting the conclusion of his argument in the premise. The fact is that the Trump campaign knew of the hack, they interacted with the Russians about it, and expected to benefit from stolen information. That's why there was an investigation. There was no impeachment due to insufficient evidence of conspiracy. For the 10 billionth time, there is no legal definition of "collusion" so if you say there was no collusion fuck it. It's meaningless. I'm tired of repeating this.
Jeezus…….so dilusional.
 
AOG is here on a political discussion board and alleges he has no knowledge of the biggest domestic hoax story in US history. Even better, he has no interest in learning about it even though it was discussed in the US MSM and alternative media sources for years. The American leftard is not only not interested in history, math, science and economics but they are proudly ignorant.
 
Everything I posted above was true. Facts are in Mueller report. Fucking read it.
 
Last edited:
Who paid for the Steele Dossier? What in the Steele Dossier is true? Who filed the fraudulent FISA affidavits? Why wasn't Trump indicted for being a Russian agent?
 
Back
Top