Sa'Vell Smalls, 6* 2020 BUCK, Seattle (Kennedy), WA (SIGNED)

[FireCohen]

Please to be burning the last 5 pages or so of this thread. This is motherfucking Sawy's thread. Can we keep it that way and take the fag out sessions into Kyle Patterson's thread.

and the best part, his recruitment about to pick up. I would bet at least 150 pages. TBS 2020 season just started

 

[Domicillo]

https://twitter.com/savvysmalls_9/status/1080210593632538624?s=21
Pardon the interruption in big back talk.

 

[animate]

That's some good crootin right there...

 

[dhdawg]

Say goodbye to savell.

Seriously. He's gone

 

[Domicillo]

Can we pleeeeease beat OSUhttps://twitter.com/savvysmalls_9/status/1079188123177738240?s=21

good caz in the next two years we should be in the playoffs

We gotta show him we will, don’t make someone else’s pedestal taller by digging your own hole right in front of it.

next year we are set up pretty well to make run, that should help seal the deal

He won’t wait to see how we do next year, he’s a kid. The past four years he’s seen Clemson and Bama just destroy in big games. Rose bowl has a chance to be the most competitive/memorable NY6 game this year, UW can’t afford to not take full advantage of this opportunity. Want to try to compete with the big dogs for him, give yourself something positive to talk about for the whole offseason.

 

[ZoneUW]

By Savell. Have fun at BAMA.

 

[MisterEm]

good caz in the next two years we should be in the playoffs

We gotta show him we will, don’t make someone else’s pedestal taller by digging your own hole right in front of it.

next year we are set up pretty well to make run, that should help seal the deal

I don't see how.

DL is the worst it's been since Pete had been here. LB is very concerning.
DB is all new. Good but very very young.

OL should be marginally better. Trey back but lose McGary.
QB is new. I know... he's not JB so should be better.
RB ...sigh. Salvon is not an every down back. No bellwether back
WR has to be better, right? Young kids is all you have.
TE is a stud.

Can special teams be any worse?

Need way too many going guys to step up to think this team wins any more than 8-9 games. OOC schedule should be 3-0. Most big games at home sans Stanford.

RB will be by committee. Chances are someone will step up, perhaps Davis.

Defense will be young but there will be more talent in the unit than we've ever had.

I'm concerned about safety and LB if beavers and Wellington aren't healthy.

This is not a 4 loss team with that schedule. GTFOH

Fuck. Beavers is never healthy. Wellington better get bigger.

RB looks shitty. Salvon only works as a compliment. Pleasant and McGrew are not great. Davis? Christ.

That's some serious fucking dooging.

Preach @TommySQC.

I'm with you brother.

First offseason bump.

Soft serve coaches beget soft serve teams.

 

[Ballz]

We still have a chance if the new uni's are dope and UW levels up on the field with Eason.

 

[montyfranklyn]

Can we pleeeeease beat OSUhttps://twitter.com/savvysmalls_9/status/1079188123177738240?s=21

good caz in the next two years we should be in the playoffs

We gotta show him we will, don’t make someone else’s pedestal taller by digging your own hole right in front of it.

next year we are set up pretty well to make run, that should help seal the deal

He won’t wait to see how we do next year, he’s a kid. The past four years he’s seen Clemson and Bama just destroy in big games. Rose bowl has a chance to be the most competitive/memorable NY6 game this year, UW can’t afford to not take full advantage of this opportunity. Want to try to compete with the big dogs for him, give yourself something positive to talk about for the whole offseason.

You don't want to see Bama next year either. We only lose D. Harris on offense and only like 5 guys on defense, potentially

 

[HillsboroDuck]

We still have a chance if the new uni's are dope and UW levels up on the field with Eason.

He's not choosing a school based on how they play in 2019. Recruiting lag theory says the on the field impressions have been made for 2020, the impact of the 2019 season will be on the 2021 signing class.

It's in the recruiters' hands now.

 

[Ballz]

We still have a chance if the new uni's are dope and UW levels up on the field with Eason.

He's not choosing a school based on how they play in 2019. Recruiting lag theory says the on the field impressions have been made for 2020, the impact of the 2019 season will be on the 2021 signing class.

It's in the recruiters' hands now.

Um no that's nonsense. The 2019 season will definitely be a factor. You don't think USC going 5-7 this season helped UW close Laiatu Latu? You think Latu would be going to UW if SC had gone 12-0?

UW going undefeated next season and getting back to the playoffs would absolutely help them potentially sign Smalls. Winning always matters for recruiting and the more games you win before it's time for a recruit to sign, the better.

 

[montyfranklyn]

We still have a chance if the new uni's are dope and UW levels up on the field with Eason.

He's not choosing a school based on how they play in 2019. Recruiting lag theory says the on the field impressions have been made for 2020, the impact of the 2019 season will be on the 2021 signing class.

It's in the recruiters' hands now.

Each season has an impact, some more than others, but do you think that the biggest competition for him, which is Bama, will have any drop off in 2019?

 

[HillsboroDuck]

We still have a chance if the new uni's are dope and UW levels up on the field with Eason.

He's not choosing a school based on how they play in 2019. Recruiting lag theory says the on the field impressions have been made for 2020, the impact of the 2019 season will be on the 2021 signing class.

It's in the recruiters' hands now.

Um no that's nonsense. The 2019 season will definitely be a factor. You don't think USC going 5-7 this season helped UW close Laiatu Latu? You think Latu would be going to UW if SC had gone 12-0?

UW going undefeated next season and getting back to the playoffs would absolutely help them potentially sign Smalls. Winning always matters for recruiting and the more games you win before it's time for a recruit to sign, the better.

It's not nonsense, @TierbsHsotBoobs was dialed in on this and his theory has proven itself to be true time and time again over the last decade plus since he first floated it.

There's a reason UW's best classes were 18 and 19, not 17, even though 16 was our best season.

These kids have basically made their minds up about these teams on the field. Sure something at the extreme margins could shift some things like is UW goes 15-0 or has a losing season but baring that, there's not going to be a huge difference between how our 2020 class looks if we win 8 or if we win 12. That on field difference will greatly impact the 2021 class though.

 

[Ballz]

We still have a chance if the new uni's are dope and UW levels up on the field with Eason.

He's not choosing a school based on how they play in 2019. Recruiting lag theory says the on the field impressions have been made for 2020, the impact of the 2019 season will be on the 2021 signing class.

It's in the recruiters' hands now.

Um no that's nonsense. The 2019 season will definitely be a factor. You don't think USC going 5-7 this season helped UW close Laiatu Latu? You think Latu would be going to UW if SC had gone 12-0?

UW going undefeated next season and getting back to the playoffs would absolutely help them potentially sign Smalls. Winning always matters for recruiting and the more games you win before it's time for a recruit to sign, the better.

It's not nonsense, @TierbsHsotBoobs was dialed in on this and his theory has proven itself to be true time and time again over the last decade plus since he first floated it.

There's a reason UW's best classes were 18 and 19, not 17, even though 16 was our best season.

These kids have basically made their minds up about these teams on the field. Sure something at the extreme margins could shift some things like is UW goes 15-0 or has a losing season but baring that, there's not going to be a huge difference between how our 2020 class looks if we win 8 or if we win 12. That on field difference will greatly impact the 2021 class though.

No, that's stupid. If that was the case, Latu would be going to SC. SC's season absolutely negatively affected their 2019 recruiting class. Latu is SC's equivalent of Smalls. He was their #1 overall target for the 2019 class. He grew up an SC fan. Like I said, if SC had gone undefeated, Latu would not be going to UW.

For guys who make their college decisions closer to Signing Day, which Smalls will, the season that they just witnessed by the teams they are considering is always a factor.

 

[HillsboroDuck]

We still have a chance if the new uni's are dope and UW levels up on the field with Eason.

He's not choosing a school based on how they play in 2019. Recruiting lag theory says the on the field impressions have been made for 2020, the impact of the 2019 season will be on the 2021 signing class.

It's in the recruiters' hands now.

Um no that's nonsense. The 2019 season will definitely be a factor. You don't think USC going 5-7 this season helped UW close Laiatu Latu? You think Latu would be going to UW if SC had gone 12-0?

UW going undefeated next season and getting back to the playoffs would absolutely help them potentially sign Smalls. Winning always matters for recruiting and the more games you win before it's time for a recruit to sign, the better.

It's not nonsense, @TierbsHsotBoobs was dialed in on this and his theory has proven itself to be true time and time again over the last decade plus since he first floated it.

There's a reason UW's best classes were 18 and 19, not 17, even though 16 was our best season.

These kids have basically made their minds up about these teams on the field. Sure something at the extreme margins could shift some things like is UW goes 15-0 or has a losing season but baring that, there's not going to be a huge difference between how our 2020 class looks if we win 8 or if we win 12. That on field difference will greatly impact the 2021 class though.

No, that's stupid. If that was the case, Latu would be going to SC. SC's season absolutely negatively affected their 2019 recruiting class. Latu is SC's equivalent of Smalls. He was their #1 overall target for the 2019 class. He grew up an SC fan. Like I said, if SC had gone undefeated, Latu would not be going to UW.

For guys who make their college decisions closer to Signing Day, which Smalls will, the season that they just witnessed by the teams they are considering is always a factor.

Right, it was an extreme season in which USC went from conference champs to a losing season, extreme enough that it put the coaches future in doubt.

UW isn't going to vary nearly that far from expectations/previous performance.

 

[Ballz]

We still have a chance if the new uni's are dope and UW levels up on the field with Eason.

He's not choosing a school based on how they play in 2019. Recruiting lag theory says the on the field impressions have been made for 2020, the impact of the 2019 season will be on the 2021 signing class.

It's in the recruiters' hands now.

Um no that's nonsense. The 2019 season will definitely be a factor. You don't think USC going 5-7 this season helped UW close Laiatu Latu? You think Latu would be going to UW if SC had gone 12-0?

UW going undefeated next season and getting back to the playoffs would absolutely help them potentially sign Smalls. Winning always matters for recruiting and the more games you win before it's time for a recruit to sign, the better.

It's not nonsense, @TierbsHsotBoobs was dialed in on this and his theory has proven itself to be true time and time again over the last decade plus since he first floated it.

There's a reason UW's best classes were 18 and 19, not 17, even though 16 was our best season.

These kids have basically made their minds up about these teams on the field. Sure something at the extreme margins could shift some things like is UW goes 15-0 or has a losing season but baring that, there's not going to be a huge difference between how our 2020 class looks if we win 8 or if we win 12. That on field difference will greatly impact the 2021 class though.

No, that's stupid. If that was the case, Latu would be going to SC. SC's season absolutely negatively affected their 2019 recruiting class. Latu is SC's equivalent of Smalls. He was their #1 overall target for the 2019 class. He grew up an SC fan. Like I said, if SC had gone undefeated, Latu would not be going to UW.

For guys who make their college decisions closer to Signing Day, which Smalls will, the season that they just witnessed by the teams they are considering is always a factor.

Right, it was an extreme season in which USC went from conference champs to a losing season, extreme enough that it put the coaches future in doubt.

UW isn't going to vary nearly that far from expectations/previous performance.

WINNING FUCKING MATTERS! Your shit is fucking stupid and you sound retarded. If UW goes 13-0 next season and gets back to the playoffs that will absolutely increase their chances of landing Smalls. Shut the fuck up you stupid idiot.

 

[HillsboroDuck]

We still have a chance if the new uni's are dope and UW levels up on the field with Eason.

He's not choosing a school based on how they play in 2019. Recruiting lag theory says the on the field impressions have been made for 2020, the impact of the 2019 season will be on the 2021 signing class.

It's in the recruiters' hands now.

Um no that's nonsense. The 2019 season will definitely be a factor. You don't think USC going 5-7 this season helped UW close Laiatu Latu? You think Latu would be going to UW if SC had gone 12-0?

UW going undefeated next season and getting back to the playoffs would absolutely help them potentially sign Smalls. Winning always matters for recruiting and the more games you win before it's time for a recruit to sign, the better.

It's not nonsense, @TierbsHsotBoobs was dialed in on this and his theory has proven itself to be true time and time again over the last decade plus since he first floated it.

There's a reason UW's best classes were 18 and 19, not 17, even though 16 was our best season.

These kids have basically made their minds up about these teams on the field. Sure something at the extreme margins could shift some things like is UW goes 15-0 or has a losing season but baring that, there's not going to be a huge difference between how our 2020 class looks if we win 8 or if we win 12. That on field difference will greatly impact the 2021 class though.

No, that's stupid. If that was the case, Latu would be going to SC. SC's season absolutely negatively affected their 2019 recruiting class. Latu is SC's equivalent of Smalls. He was their #1 overall target for the 2019 class. He grew up an SC fan. Like I said, if SC had gone undefeated, Latu would not be going to UW.

For guys who make their college decisions closer to Signing Day, which Smalls will, the season that they just witnessed by the teams they are considering is always a factor.

Right, it was an extreme season in which USC went from conference champs to a losing season, extreme enough that it put the coaches future in doubt.

UW isn't going to vary nearly that far from expectations/previous performance.

WINNING FUCKING MATTERS! Your shit is fucking stupid and you sound retarded. If UW goes 13-0 next season and gets back to the playoffs that will absolutely increase their chances of landing Smalls. Shut the fuck up you stupid idiot.

We aren't going 13-0 next season

 

[Ballz]

We still have a chance if the new uni's are dope and UW levels up on the field with Eason.

He's not choosing a school based on how they play in 2019. Recruiting lag theory says the on the field impressions have been made for 2020, the impact of the 2019 season will be on the 2021 signing class.

It's in the recruiters' hands now.

Um no that's nonsense. The 2019 season will definitely be a factor. You don't think USC going 5-7 this season helped UW close Laiatu Latu? You think Latu would be going to UW if SC had gone 12-0?

UW going undefeated next season and getting back to the playoffs would absolutely help them potentially sign Smalls. Winning always matters for recruiting and the more games you win before it's time for a recruit to sign, the better.

It's not nonsense, @TierbsHsotBoobs was dialed in on this and his theory has proven itself to be true time and time again over the last decade plus since he first floated it.

There's a reason UW's best classes were 18 and 19, not 17, even though 16 was our best season.

These kids have basically made their minds up about these teams on the field. Sure something at the extreme margins could shift some things like is UW goes 15-0 or has a losing season but baring that, there's not going to be a huge difference between how our 2020 class looks if we win 8 or if we win 12. That on field difference will greatly impact the 2021 class though.

No, that's stupid. If that was the case, Latu would be going to SC. SC's season absolutely negatively affected their 2019 recruiting class. Latu is SC's equivalent of Smalls. He was their #1 overall target for the 2019 class. He grew up an SC fan. Like I said, if SC had gone undefeated, Latu would not be going to UW.

For guys who make their college decisions closer to Signing Day, which Smalls will, the season that they just witnessed by the teams they are considering is always a factor.

Right, it was an extreme season in which USC went from conference champs to a losing season, extreme enough that it put the coaches future in doubt.

UW isn't going to vary nearly that far from expectations/previous performance.

WINNING FUCKING MATTERS! Your shit is fucking stupid and you sound retarded. If UW goes 13-0 next season and gets back to the playoffs that will absolutely increase their chances of landing Smalls. Shut the fuck up you stupid idiot.

We aren't going 13-0 next season

You don't know that @dnc bitch

 

[Sources]

We still have a chance if the new uni's are dope and UW levels up on the field with Eason.

He's not choosing a school based on how they play in 2019. Recruiting lag theory says the on the field impressions have been made for 2020, the impact of the 2019 season will be on the 2021 signing class.

It's in the recruiters' hands now.

Um no that's nonsense. The 2019 season will definitely be a factor. You don't think USC going 5-7 this season helped UW close Laiatu Latu? You think Latu would be going to UW if SC had gone 12-0?

UW going undefeated next season and getting back to the playoffs would absolutely help them potentially sign Smalls. Winning always matters for recruiting and the more games you win before it's time for a recruit to sign, the better.

It's not nonsense, @TierbsHsotBoobs was dialed in on this and his theory has proven itself to be true time and time again over the last decade plus since he first floated it.

There's a reason UW's best classes were 18 and 19, not 17, even though 16 was our best season.

These kids have basically made their minds up about these teams on the field. Sure something at the extreme margins could shift some things like is UW goes 15-0 or has a losing season but baring that, there's not going to be a huge difference between how our 2020 class looks if we win 8 or if we win 12. That on field difference will greatly impact the 2021 class though.

No, that's stupid. If that was the case, Latu would be going to SC. SC's season absolutely negatively affected their 2019 recruiting class. Latu is SC's equivalent of Smalls. He was their #1 overall target for the 2019 class. He grew up an SC fan. Like I said, if SC had gone undefeated, Latu would not be going to UW.

For guys who make their college decisions closer to Signing Day, which Smalls will, the season that they just witnessed by the teams they are considering is always a factor.

Right, it was an extreme season in which USC went from conference champs to a losing season, extreme enough that it put the coaches future in doubt.

UW isn't going to vary nearly that far from expectations/previous performance.

WINNING FUCKING MATTERS! Your shit is fucking stupid and you sound retarded. If UW goes 13-0 next season and gets back to the playoffs that will absolutely increase their chances of landing Smalls. Shut the fuck up you stupid idiot.

We aren't going 13-0 next season

You don't know that @dnc bitch

HRYK - if we are 12-0, we're in the playoff and losing to Clemson after nearly battling back from a 3 TD deficit.

 

[jhfstyle24]

We still have a chance if the new uni's are dope and UW levels up on the field with Eason.

He's not choosing a school based on how they play in 2019. Recruiting lag theory says the on the field impressions have been made for 2020, the impact of the 2019 season will be on the 2021 signing class.

It's in the recruiters' hands now.

Um no that's nonsense. The 2019 season will definitely be a factor. You don't think USC going 5-7 this season helped UW close Laiatu Latu? You think Latu would be going to UW if SC had gone 12-0?

UW going undefeated next season and getting back to the playoffs would absolutely help them potentially sign Smalls. Winning always matters for recruiting and the more games you win before it's time for a recruit to sign, the better.

It's not nonsense, @TierbsHsotBoobs was dialed in on this and his theory has proven itself to be true time and time again over the last decade plus since he first floated it.

There's a reason UW's best classes were 18 and 19, not 17, even though 16 was our best season.

These kids have basically made their minds up about these teams on the field. Sure something at the extreme margins could shift some things like is UW goes 15-0 or has a losing season but baring that, there's not going to be a huge difference between how our 2020 class looks if we win 8 or if we win 12. That on field difference will greatly impact the 2021 class though.

No, that's stupid. If that was the case, Latu would be going to SC. SC's season absolutely negatively affected their 2019 recruiting class. Latu is SC's equivalent of Smalls. He was their #1 overall target for the 2019 class. He grew up an SC fan. Like I said, if SC had gone undefeated, Latu would not be going to UW.

For guys who make their college decisions closer to Signing Day, which Smalls will, the season that they just witnessed by the teams they are considering is always a factor.

Right, it was an extreme season in which USC went from conference champs to a losing season, extreme enough that it put the coaches future in doubt.

UW isn't going to vary nearly that far from expectations/previous performance.

WINNING FUCKING MATTERS! Your shit is fucking stupid and you sound retarded. If UW goes 13-0 next season and gets back to the playoffs that will absolutely increase their chances of landing Smalls. Shut the fuck up you stupid idiot.

We aren't going 13-0 next season

You don't know that @dnc bitch

HRYK - if we are 12-0, we're in the playoff and losing to Clemson after nearly battling back from a 3 TD deficit.

If we are 12-0, we are bemoaning Bush not throwing to Hunter Bryant in the Pac 12 championship game vs a 6-6 Utah team, only for us to win after Fuller throws an INT on a trick play, but Bryant forces a fumble from the returner and Ahmed scores the td on the scoop to win 6-5 on account of a Peyton Henry blocked XP returned for 2 and a Yoooooot FG from 69 yards out.

THEN we're in the playoff and losing to Clemson after nearly battling back from a 3 TD deficit.