While this fluff piece is being written, we get fat curmudgeons like F3 writing an assessment of UW's spring for collegefootballnews.com and insinuating Peetamus is having a hard time getting players to buy into his style. How the fuck does fetters even know this?
This article delivers:
http://cfn.scout.com/2/1388682.html
From F3:
Obviously the jury is still out because Petersen hasn't coached one game at the Pac-12 level, but if you just go by his record at Boise State compared to Sarkisian's relative mediocrity, you'd have to assume he'll be an upgrade.
[Teq: Thanks Fetters for stepping away from Doogman and Kim Jong Vino's obsession w/ Sark and pointing out that Sark was mediocre ... ]
So far through two weeks of spring everyone is saying the right things outwardly, but I still sense that not everyone has bought into what Petersen is selling. It's up to the senior leaders and captains to take hold, and however they have to sell it - a fresh start, more of the 'we all we got, we all we need' mantra, etc... - it doesn't really matter.
[Teq: Obligatory shot from F3 to redeem himself in the Doogman agenda ... changing culture is helped by player leadership obviously, but it's up to Petersen to sell the players that he knows what he's doing ... hard to imagine too many of the players not seeing that he doesn't given his results ... all comments so far have pointed to the players being on board]
Everybody else ... Washington upgraded with references of "Seven Win Steve," the program plateauing, and citing that Petersen coaches up his players.