JaWarrenJaHooker
Active poster
8 wins every year with a Top 3 class every offseason is going to be fucking pure entertainment.
Last edited:
They'll win more than 8, but they won't be a real player for a natty.
Both Sark and Mora are going to underperform their talent - the status quo is tailor-made for teams from the North.
Sark will win 10 every year.
Sark will win 10 every year.
He will win 10 in a good year with natty type of talent.
SC has been buoyed a bit by the easier OrSt/Wazzu pair and DavidShawFS coaching meltdowns the past two years. That ends this year, the former at least.
SC gets the harder Ore/UW pair the next two years, as well as Stanford, plus the pac12 south. To go along with ND and Alabama over the next two years. I don't see Sark winning 10 games in either of the next two seasons. If that happens I don't think he sees a 4th season.
Both Sark and Mora are going to underperform their talent - the status quo is tailor-made for teams from the North.
Like Winnipeg and Saskatchawan?
Well, they are entering the season with top 5 rankings. I think an 8 or 9 wins season would require that he beat UCLA and end the streak, maybe even ND as well. Even then...he'd still be out a lot of goodwill for failing to meet CFP level expectations.SC has been buoyed a bit by the easier OrSt/Wazzu pair and DavidShawFS coaching meltdowns the past two years. That ends this year, the former at least.
SC gets the harder Ore/UW pair the next two years, as well as Stanford, plus the pac12 south. To go along with ND and Alabama over the next two years. I don't see Sark winning 10 games in either of the next two seasons. If that happens I don't think he sees a 4th season.
It depends how long the leash is. As long as Haden is there, Sark will be the coach barring disaster. I do agree that this year could be a disaster. I think he can sacrifice Wilcox or whatever assistants to buy him another year if needed.
If he gets to year four and five, he will eventually win 10.
Both Sark and Mora are going to underperform their talent - the status quo is tailor-made for teams from the North.
Like Winnipeg and Saskatchawan?
I'm hearing Elsinore Tech is getting serious about football.
![]()
This I don't agree with. Two 4 star QB's is definitely better than one because it's a crapshoot anyway and it doubles your odds of finding one who's worth a damn.Sark's TBS ratings include 2 highly rated QBs every year and ultimately one of them will LEAVE! or carry a clipbored, so really the mathletes calculating all these ratings should reduce Sark's rating by one 4-5* each NSD.
No, though it does happen on occassion.i see your point, and for the record, i don't follow TBS very much, but do most programs sign 2 of the top QBs in each class like Sark does?
No, though it does happen on occassion.i see your point, and for the record, i don't follow TBS very much, but do most programs sign 2 of the top QBs in each class like Sark does?
Sark doesn't really do it that often either. Here's his classes as head man:
UW
09 (transition class), one QB, 3* Keith Price
10, one QB, 4* (lol!) Big Sky
11, one QB, 3* Derrick Brown (unless you want to count 2* Antavius Sims but IIRC he was not recruited here as a QB)
12, two QB's, 4* Myley Cyrus, 4* Jeff Whitepowerquist
13, one QB, 4* Blackpower Williams
USC
14 (transition class), one QB, 3* Jalen only player to decommit from Peterman Greene
15 two QB's, 4* Sam Darnold, 4* Ricky Town
So he's done it twice in seven years.