Sark doesn't watch Seahawk Games

Seahawks starting offensive plays from San Diego game.

Series #1
1. Wilson Pass
2. Wilson Pass
3. Run
4. Wilson Pass
5. Punt

Series #2
1. Run
2. Wilson Scramble (Passing Play)
3. Wilson Scramble (Passing Play)
4. Run
5. Run
6. Wilson Pass
7. Wilson Pass
8. Wilson Pass

8 Pass Plays
3 Run Plays
2 Punts

Not sure what you wanted Sark to pick up from watching the Seahawk game. Pretty sure that looks just like every one of our games that you bitch about.

They forced things early and Passsed, Passed, Passed. Exactly opposite of what you just posted.

You are pressing pretty fucking bad, Bro!!!!!
Click to expand...

Well............This board has officially gone to shit.
 
The question you should be asking is why not one person called the original poster out for making a statement that was totally false?

That's right......he was following the script.

The best part of the thread was that he was hyping up the Hawks for starting a game just like UW does. Yet, not one of you called him out.

I point it out........and I'm the problem.
Click to expand...
Because no one pays that close of attention to preseason games and the overall in season trend is well established.

The Seahawks run to set up the pass. They are a smashmouth team.

You can't refute any of this.
 
If you are going to bitch, bitch about the right things:

--Offensive line depth is still shit after 5 years
--cannot protect the QB
--cannot defend the spread
--S/T
--penalties
--game management by head coach

In our freakin' bowl game we ran the ball 38 times, including 8 of our 1st 13 plays and still lost. And overall we had close to a 50-50 mix for the year.

But when your QB is sacked 37 times, that takes away even more run plays.

Run/pass mix is way down on the list of things that NEED to be fixed this year.
 
If you are going to bitch, bitch about the right things:

--Offensive line depth is still shit after 5 years
--cannot protect the QB
--cannot defend the spread
--S/T
--penalties
--game management by head coach

In our freakin' bowl game we ran the ball 38 times, including 8 of our 1st 13 plays and still lost. And overall we had close to a 50-50 mix for the year.

But when your QB is sacked 37 times, that takes away even more run plays.

Run/pass mix is way down on the list of things that NEED to be fixed this year.
Click to expand...
Special Teams is a mixed bag

 
If you are going to bitch, bitch about the right things:

--Offensive line depth is still shit after 5 years
--cannot protect the QB
--cannot defend the spread
--S/T
--penalties
--game management by head coach

In our freakin' bowl game we ran the ball 38 times, including 8 of our 1st 13 plays and still lost. And overall we had close to a 50-50 mix for the year.

But when your QB is sacked 37 times, that takes away even more run plays.

Run/pass mix is way down on the list of things that NEED to be fixed this year.
Click to expand...
Special Teams is a mixed bag
Click to expand...

Travis Coons & Shane Williams-Rhodes disagree.
 
When your QB is sacked 37 times it counts as 37 runs in your bogus 50-50 stat
 
No fringin kidding. What the hell does a pre-season game have to do with anything?

Drawing conclusions from this is worthless

The question is who the fuck would chart a preseason game?
Click to expand...
 
Last edited:
When your QB is sacked 37 times it counts as 37 runs in your bogus 50-50 stat
Click to expand...

466 run plays

438 pass plays

So back out those 37 sacks, and you get real close to the 50-50 "bogus" stat. HTH

How many times do I need to tell you, leave the football talk to the big boys.

:))
 
No fringin kidding. What the hell does a pre-season game have to do with anything?

Drawing conclusions from this is worthless

The question is who the fuck would chart a preseason game?
Click to expand...
Click to expand...

Maybe you two should take that up with the original poster that thought our Head Coach could learn something from it. No one seemed to have a problem with him using pre-season games when it fit the script.
 
The question you should be asking is why not one person called the original poster out for making a statement that was totally false?

That's right......he was following the script.

The best part of the thread was that he was hyping up the Hawks for starting a game just like UW does. Yet, not one of you called him out.

I point it out........and I'm the problem.
Click to expand...
Because no one pays that close of attention to preseason games and the overall in season trend is well established.

The Seahawks run to set up the pass. They are a smashmouth team.

You can't refute any of this.
Click to expand...

Well Established?

Like in the Playoffs with your season on the line?

Seahawks vs. Atlanta - 1st Half

Falcons - 20
Seahawks -0

Seahawk Passing Plays - 20
Seahawk Running Plays - 11

That sure is a well established game plan. Maybe they should try using it next time their season is on the line.
 
Thoughts and prayers go out to HardcoreHusky (RIP).
Click to expand...

T's and P's to HardcoreHusky. I don't know if this board can survive both IrishDoog and IMALOSER.
Click to expand...

It's the same guy. I'm not sure if that makes it better or worse.
Click to expand...

I know it's the same fucktard and he'll create even more handles to pollute this place.

When Derek said Harv made dawgboard a cest pool I laughed. Guys like IrishDoog/IMALOSER/Factchecker ruined the board.
 
Thoughts and prayers go out to HardcoreHusky (RIP).
Click to expand...

T's and P's to HardcoreHusky. I don't know if this board can survive both IrishDoog and IMALOSER.
Click to expand...

It's the same guy. I'm not sure if that makes it better or worse.
Click to expand...

I know it's the same fucktard and he'll create even more handles to pollute this place.

When Derek said Harv made dawgboard a cest pool I laughed. Guys like IrishDoog/IMALOSER/Factchecker ruined the board.
Click to expand...

You obviously weren't looking closely enough at how he trolled said posters
 
The question you should be asking is why not one person called the original poster out for making a statement that was totally false?

That's right......he was following the script.

The best part of the thread was that he was hyping up the Hawks for starting a game just like UW does. Yet, not one of you called him out.

I point it out........and I'm the problem.
Click to expand...
Because no one pays that close of attention to preseason games and the overall in season trend is well established.

The Seahawks run to set up the pass. They are a smashmouth team.

You can't refute any of this.
Click to expand...

Well Established?

Like in the Playoffs with your season on the line?

Seahawks vs. Atlanta - 1st Half

Falcons - 20
Seahawks -0

Seahawk Passing Plays - 20
Seahawk Running Plays - 11

That sure is a well established game plan. Maybe they should try using it next time their season is on the line.
Click to expand...
I like to cherry pick one game from a season of 18 and pretend that proves something. I like to do that.

 
Thoughts and prayers go out to HardcoreHusky (RIP).
Click to expand...

T's and P's to HardcoreHusky. I don't know if this board can survive both IrishDoog and IMALOSER.
Click to expand...

It's the same guy. I'm not sure if that makes it better or worse.
Click to expand...

I know it's the same fucktard and he'll create even more handles to pollute this place.

When Derek said Harv made dawgboard a cest pool I laughed. Guys like IrishDoog/IMALOSER/Factchecker ruined the board.
Click to expand...

Wow, you really are slow.

If a guy who does not march along like a zombie and actually uses facts/stats to back up his arguments ruins this board, the I am your man.

Like others you hate the fact that I am not a full Doog or Noog, and can actually think for myself.

You should try it sometime.
 
good teams adjust their game plans, if a team is loading the box of course u pass, the thing with sark is he ditches the run at random
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top