Sark doesn't watch Seahawk Games

They don't try and force anything early. They run, run, run and when it becomes effective, they run play action and take a few shots down the field. Throw in a few forced turnovers and a good return and you get 31 points. If Sark coached this game the hawks would have more yards but 17 points and more turnovers.
 
They play good special teams, have a tough defense, the offense is also tough. The players actually get coached up unlike at UW.

The Seahawks also have a good OL coach who coaches up his OL as well. The play calling like I said can be "simplistic" but it's very effective.

If Sark is fired I'd rather he not join the Seahawks coaching staff as he is a terrible play caller.
 
They play good special teams, have a tough defense, the offense is also tough. The players actually get coached up unlike at UW.

The Seahawks also have a good OL coach who coaches up his OL as well. The play calling like I said can be "simplistic" but it's very effective.

If Sark is fired I'd rather he not join the Seahawks coaching staff as he is a terrible play caller.

He'd be fine because Carroll would give him strict guideline to what he could call. Sark would still have to give it to Lynch 20+ times, other backs 5-10, and I doubt Carroll would allow all of the fancy motions/shifts on every play.

Having said that, there are many guys I would prefer over Sark.

 
Last edited:
The Seahawks have an identity, no matter the opponent they run the ball and play defense. The huskies have no identity, in fact it changes every week
 
The Seahawks have an identity, no matter the opponent they run the ball and play defense. The huskies have no identity, in fact it changes every week

Hey, the kids played hard!!!1!!
 
They play good special teams, have a tough defense, the offense is also tough. The players actually get coached up unlike at UW.

The Seahawks also have a good OL coach who coaches up his OL as well. The play calling like I said can be "simplistic" but it's very effective.

If Sark is fired I'd rather he not join the Seahawks coaching staff as he is a terrible play caller.

Nothing wrong with "simplistic", it increases the likelihood of perfect execution. I prefer that to seeing a coach "outsmart" himself, something Husky fans have seen far too much of in recent years.
 
They play good special teams, have a tough defense, the offense is also tough. The players actually get coached up unlike at UW.

The Seahawks also have a good OL coach who coaches up his OL as well. The play calling like I said can be "simplistic" but it's very effective.

If Sark is fired I'd rather he not join the Seahawks coaching staff as he is a terrible play caller.

Nothing wrong with "simplistic", it increases the likelihood of perfect execution. I prefer that to seeing a coach "outsmart" himself, something Husky fans have seen far too much of in recent years.

This was the Chimp Smelly (ROFL) model at whOregon (double ROFL) that doogs call gimmicky.
 
They play good special teams, have a tough defense, the offense is also tough. The players actually get coached up unlike at UW.

The Seahawks also have a good OL coach who coaches up his OL as well. The play calling like I said can be "simplistic" but it's very effective.

If Sark is fired I'd rather he not join the Seahawks coaching staff as he is a terrible play caller.

Nothing wrong with "simplistic", it increases the likelihood of perfect execution. I prefer that to seeing a coach "outsmart" himself, something Husky fans have seen far too much of in recent years.

This was the Chimp Smelly (ROFL) model at whOregon (double ROFL) that doogs call gimmicky.

The same model that Doogs now love because Sark has adopted it as the flavor of the week.
 
They play good special teams, have a tough defense, the offense is also tough. The players actually get coached up unlike at UW.

The Seahawks also have a good OL coach who coaches up his OL as well. The play calling like I said can be "simplistic" but it's very effective.

If Sark is fired I'd rather he not join the Seahawks coaching staff as he is a terrible play caller.

Nothing wrong with "simplistic", it increases the likelihood of perfect execution. I prefer that to seeing a coach "outsmart" himself, something Husky fans have seen far too much of in recent years.

This was the Chimp Smelly (ROFL) model at whOregon (double ROFL) that doogs call gimmicky.

The same model that Doogs now love because Sark has adopted it as the flavor of the week.

I fucking hate our fanbase.
 
Seahawks starting offensive plays from San Diego game.

Series #1
1. Wilson Pass
2. Wilson Pass
3. Run
4. Wilson Pass
5. Punt

Series #2
1. Run
2. Wilson Scramble (Passing Play)
3. Wilson Scramble (Passing Play)
4. Run
5. Run
6. Wilson Pass
7. Wilson Pass
8. Wilson Pass

8 Pass Plays
3 Run Plays
2 Punts

Not sure what you wanted Sark to pick up from watching the Seahawk game. Pretty sure that looks just like every one of our games that you bitch about.

They forced things early and Passsed, Passed, Passed. Exactly opposite of what you just posted.

You are pressing pretty fucking bad, Bro!!!!!
 
Thoughts and prayers go out to HardcoreHusky (RIP).

T's and P's to HardcoreHusky. I don't know if this board can survive both IrishDoog and IMALOSER.
 
The question you should be asking is why not one person called the original poster out for making a statement that was totally false?

That's right......he was following the script.

The best part of the thread was that he was hyping up the Hawks for starting a game just like UW does. Yet, not one of you called him out.

I point it out........and I'm the problem.
 
The question you should be asking is why not one person called the original poster out for making a statement that was totally false?

That's right......he was following the script.

The best part of the thread was that he was hyping up the Hawks for starting a game just like UW does. Yet, not one of you called him out.

I point it out........and I'm the problem.

The Seahawks won the game 31-10 throwing the ball 26 times and running the ball 29 times. I don't really get your point.

Only one team in the NFL ran the ball more than they threw.....the Seahawks.
 
The question you should be asking is why not one person called the original poster out for making a statement that was totally false?

That's right......he was following the script.

The best part of the thread was that he was hyping up the Hawks for starting a game just like UW does. Yet, not one of you called him out.

I point it out........and I'm the problem.

The Seahawks won the game 31-10 throwing the ball 26 times and running the ball 29 times. I don't really get your point.

Only one team in the NFL ran the ball more than they threw.....the Seahawks.

Read the original post and you will realize you just wasted a lot of time typing that.

I'll help you out with some Cliffsnotes
1. They don't try and force anything early.
2. They run, run, run and when it becomes effective, they run play action and take a few shots down the field.

The original post was discussing how they start the game by using the run to set up the pass. They Hawks did not start the game like that.

Since you are beating your chest about the Hawks running the ball more than they throw.............so did the Huskies last year.
 
The question you should be asking is why not one person called the original poster out for making a statement that was totally false?

That's right......he was following the script.

The best part of the thread was that he was hyping up the Hawks for starting a game just like UW does. Yet, not one of you called him out.

I point it out........and I'm the problem.

No one called it out because no one gives a fuck about NFL preseason games.

Hope this helps, even though I know it won't.
 
Back
Top