Sark asked about Josh Garnett.

What a prick. But lookit, you'd be butthurt too the moment you realized that Pat Haden isn't fucking calling you.
 
We have no idea what is going on in that regard. For all we know, he was up late last night having a fight with his wife about the prospect of relocating. We don't know.

Or maybe he's keenly aware that he won't be looked at as a genius a couple weeks from now.
 
or up all night talking to his agent and then waiting for call backs after his agent talks to SC and so on as they work on a deal. i expect no matter how it goes down we'll get some free pub!
 
During a post-practice interview, he shrugged off the question. Almost acted like he didn't know who Garnett is. (3:10 mark): blogs.seattletimes.com/huskyfootball/?from=stnv2
Click to expand...

honestly, what the fuck is he supposed to do? so after talking about the Furd front seven for 5 fucking minutes, some idiot walks up and asks, "so what kind of challenge does their front seven present?" frankly most other coaches would have told him to go fuck himself and get to work on time - next time. if anything he was nice by saying "sorry bud I just answered that question." imagine Parcells fielding that one.

then some dumb fuck asks him if what Garnett is doing at Stanford is what he envisioned him doing here? it's a loaded fucking question and, again, I ask you to imagine a guy like Parcells taking that one. what the fuck? "uh, no not at all. I envisioned him competing with Keith for time under fucking center." what the fuck else would we have envisioned? we recruited him for obvious reasons and he didn't come. what else could the guy have been fishing for?

look I'm all about poking shit at the coach, but sometimes you guys try too hard.
 
Last edited:
During a post-practice interview, he shrugged off the question. Almost acted like he didn't know who Garnett is. (3:10 mark): blogs.seattletimes.com/huskyfootball/?from=stnv2
Click to expand...

honestly, what the fuck is he supposed to do? so after talking about the Furd front seven for 5 fucking minutes, some idiot walks up and asks, "so what kind of challenge does their front seven present?" frankly most other coaches would have told him to go fuck himself and get to work on time - next time. if anything he was nice by saying "sorry bud I just answered that question." imagine Parcells fielding that one.

then some dumb fuck asks him if what Garnett is doing at Stanford is what he envisioned him doing here? it's a loaded fucking question and, again, I ask you to imagine a guy like Parcells taking that one. what the fuck? "uh, no not at all. I envisioned him competing with Keith for time under fucking center." what the fuck else would we have envisioned? we recruited him for obvious reasons and he didn't come. what else could the guy have been fishing for?

look I'm all about poking shit at the coach, but sometimes you guys try too hard.
Click to expand...

I would have loved to see them do that line of questioning to a Saban or Chip. Would have been some great sound bites.

Even Mike Leach would have had a field day with those questions too.
 
During a post-practice interview, he shrugged off the question. Almost acted like he didn't know who Garnett is. (3:10 mark): blogs.seattletimes.com/huskyfootball/?from=stnv2
Click to expand...

The question about Josh Garnett, if it was asked, was intended as an attempt probably by a sodbuster to embarrass Sark and Husky Football before a big road game and it sounds like Sark responded appropriately with little or nothing to say. Lately, our young head coach-in-training is I think doing a little better job not allowing himself to be baited by the media. Perhaps this is coming with some success on the field and even though he still talks way too much to piranha breaths who will hammer him unmercifully should he win enough at UW to achieve celebtity status, can we now see any trend towards Sark becoming the astute coach we need? Probably dreaming.

 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top