Sad To Report A New Doog

I really want to close out the regular season 4-0 (which would give us a 6-3 conference record) but obviously don't see that happening. In a way, if we lose @ UCLA, I want to see SSWS get his shit pushed in so badly that more people (Doogs or not) start seeing what we've been seeing. If we lose @ UCLA, screw the moral victories from a 4 point loss, I'd rather lose 34-13 and see the Fat Club Hopping Hamster again have just as many 3 and outs as punts (like the Debacle In The Desert II).

Yes it will make Wilcox look worse than he is but any DAWG fan with half a brain will know that having to defend 85+ plays on D will make nearly any DC look bad (especially one that is starting a former walk-on TE on the DL because Sarkisian missed so badly on DL other than Kikaha, Shelton, and Cree from 2010-2012. I'm not writing Turpin off yet but it didn't help that Vatuvei hurt his knee and then was a dud of a teammate (2012 class).
Click to expand...

Cree? Don't be one of those guys who anoints a player because he made one notable play. Connor Cree is not a guy who plays if you have a championship caliber team. And I think you can write Turpin off. If we had a team with great depth, you could say he is just a redshirt freshman and to give him some time. However, he doesn't play and we basically play anyone with a pulse on the DL.

 
Eklund says he sees Brostek redshirting or leaving next year. "The coaches aren't pleased with his progress." Yeah, Ektard because I'm so sure Hindy and Tufunga and going to tear it up. We are so stacked on the OL that losing the guy who was supposedly as good as Garnett is no big deal. It would be really smart to push Brostek out when six players from the OL graduate after the 2014 season, and we have no one behind them. Wasn't Brostek considered the best of the bunch from his OL class? The football analysis on doogman is completely worthless.
Click to expand...

I sincerely hope that Brostek stays in class somewhere and gets his degree for from what we've seen thus far, he'll never make a living playing football. Obviously, the kid was thrown into the fire of varsity action way too soon in 2012 and who knows but that his talent and athleticism was misjudged by UW's recruiting braintrust.

Of course, Brostek was a prodigy recruit who's legendary dad was one of UW's greatest centers that went on to have a long OL career in the NFL. But who other than UW recruited the kid for the 2012 class? Was the doogman.com story about Shane's dad protecting his son from recruiting hype by shutting it off completely except for Sark ever really believable?

I truly hope I'm wrong, but at the time of his rather quiet recruitment, I thought Shane Brostek might be a placebo handed out by doogman.com to prepare us for the probable loss of Garnett to Stanford. Can Sarkossetto or doogman.com have any credibility remaining with regard to recruiting offensive linemen?

 
Eklund says he sees Brostek redshirting or leaving next year. "The coaches aren't pleased with his progress." Yeah, Ektard because I'm so sure Hindy and Tufunga and going to tear it up. We are so stacked on the OL that losing the guy who was supposedly as good as Garnett is no big deal. It would be really smart to push Brostek out when six players from the OL graduate after the 2014 season, and we have no one behind them. Wasn't Brostek considered the best of the bunch from his OL class? The football analysis on doogman is completely worthless.
Click to expand...

I sincerely hope that Brostek stays in class somewhere and gets his degree for from what we've seen thus far, he'll never make a living playing football. Obviously, the kid was thrown into the fire of varsity action way too soon in 2012 and who knows but that his talent and athleticism was misjudged by UW's recruiting braintrust.

Of course, Brostek was a prodigy recruit who's legendary dad was one of UW's greatest centers that went on to have a long OL career in the NFL. But who other than UW recruited the kid for the 2012 class? Was the doogman.com story about Shane's dad protecting his son from recruiting hype by shutting it off completely except for Sark ever really believable?

I truly hope I'm wrong, but at the time of his rather quiet recruitment, I thought Shane Brostek might be a placebo handed out by doogman.com to prepare us for the probable loss of Garnett to Stanford. Can Sarkossetto or doogman.com have any credibility remaining with regard to recruiting offensive linemen?
Click to expand...
Negative ghost rider, the pattern is full.

 
bailey?
Click to expand...

He was really dooging it up badly today on Twitter.
Click to expand...

He has been dooging hard lately. Dont remind him that Gilby went 1-10, he will flip the fuck out.
Click to expand...

Someone had a tweet about Rick winning the Rose Bowl and he literally said "Rick never won a Rose Bowl. That was Lambo's!".............uhhh no.
 
I had a giant doog tell me Brostek was like a secret 5 star linemen and how his dad shielded him from media and he was a secret verbal. He would also go on and on about Beaver being a shut down corner as a true freshman.... he got all his material from the chat room with teen boy stalker. Said 2013 was going to be a rose bowl year.
Click to expand...

I do remember hearing how Brostek would be a four star if not five star if he was in the states instead of Hawaii. Doogs were pumped when we landed him even though Sark struck out on three highly rated OL in our state.
 
Wait, Brostek isn't redshirting this year? What the fuck? If there's a case for a guy to redshirt, it's Brostek this year. He was forced into the line up because of injuries and a lack of depth last year - I'll even give Sark a pass. Losing 3 starters does some shitty damage to a team with good depth. The kid didn't need to play this year at all. Give him a year to practice and give him a year with IVAN!!!

Fuck I hate Sark. [/QUOTE]

cbsnews.com/video/watch/?id=50158258n
 
bailey?
Click to expand...

He was really dooging it up badly today on Twitter.
Click to expand...

He has been dooging hard lately. Dont remind him that Gilby went 1-10, he will flip the fuck out.
Click to expand...

Someone had a tweet about Rick winning the Rose Bowl and he literally said "Rick never won a Rose Bowl. That was Lambo's!".............uhhh no.
Click to expand...

uh what

what's the logic behind that one lol

doog anti-intellectualism never ceases to amaze
 
I think Cree will at least be a solid rotation guy when he's a RS-JR. Turpin is only a RS-Frosh (though he's on the short side)...not saying either will be All Pac-12 but not ready to write them off since they are still relatively young.

 
I think Cree will at least be a solid rotation guy when he's a RS-JR. Turpin is only a RS-Frosh (though he's on the short side)...not saying either will be All Pac-12 but not ready to write them off since they are still relatively young.
Click to expand...

At a normal school you could be right but at UW players stay the same if not regress.
 
Nantard and Holt weren't able to screw him up too much because they only had 1 year with Cree....I'm not ready to throw in the towel on Tosh as a DL coach either, especially since he's a monster recruiter.
 
I think Cree will at least be a solid rotation guy when he's a RS-JR. Turpin is only a RS-Frosh (though he's on the short side)...not saying either will be All Pac-12 but not ready to write them off since they are still relatively young.
Click to expand...

Rotation guys aren't going to help us. We have a plethora of rotation guys, and Cree is not much different than the rest of them. We need legit starters who are at worst, honorable mention all conference. I get that you need depth on the DL, and Cree will be serviceable, but he's just a guy. We will never win a game because of Cree.

 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top