UW has been making S&P+[/s] football look bad all year.
UW has been making S&P+ look bad all year.
So...lead pipe cinch, take out a second mortgage and risk it all type of science supporting this bet, right? I'm really asking. I hate money and would love to lose some.
So...lead pipe cinch, take out a second mortgage and risk it all type of science supporting this bet, right? I'm really asking. I hate money and would love to lose some.
I’m such a Doog that I’m still expecting us to actually look good one week. Kinda like the 2002 Oregon State game.
Stanford has had a weird year. Lost to a Kansas school and Wazzu but beat USC (when USC still believed) and Duck.
My guess is UW wins because somehow Stanford has a worse rush attack (95 YPG) than we? (107 YPG) do and our pass defence is probably the only functional part of the team.
Stanford has had a weird year. Lost to a Kansas school and Wazzu but beat USC (when USC still believed) and Duck.
My guess is UW wins because somehow Stanford has a worse rush attack (95 YPG) than we? (107 YPG) do and our pass defence is probably the only functional part of the team.
Stanford running attack is only bad because it hasn't played us yet.
Stanford has had a weird year. Lost to a Kansas school and Wazzu but beat USC (when USC still believed) and Duck.
We will have a rough time handling the Tree with only 9 on defense
I don't count the 2 safeties that do not appear on camera until the play is over
We will have a rough time handling the Tree with only 9 on defense
I don't count the 2 safeties that do not appear on camera until the play is over
They brought the safeties up more against Arizona. They didn't have an impact. So far none of them are very good at anything.
The amount of player improvement that has not been going on is really the biggest thing that stands out on this team. I thought the good S&C would at least carry over. Everyone looks weaker than ever though. Nobody goes down violently or falls backward against this defense. Gordon and McDuffie are the only two that I can remember making a clean, form tackle where the runner doesn't twist or slide off and at least fall forward. Most of the time the safeties are just getting trucked and praying the guy trips and goes down.
So...lead pipe cinch, take out a second mortgage and risk it all type of science supporting this bet, right? I'm really asking. I hate money and would love to lose some.
I’m such a Doog that I’m still expecting us to actually look good one week. Kinda like the 2002 Oregon State game.
That was a career game for at least two huskies...ET and Mateaki. Tank was dominant too.
I do the same. I kept eagerly anticipating someone busting a big play against Arizona. By the time it finally happened I remembered that I wanted UW to lose that game.
So...lead pipe cinch, take out a second mortgage and risk it all type of science supporting this bet, right? I'm really asking. I hate money and would love to lose some.
I’m such a Doog that I’m still expecting us to actually look good one week. Kinda like the 2002 Oregon State game.
That was a career game for at least two huskies...ET and Mateaki. Tank was dominant too.
I do the same. I kept eagerly anticipating someone busting a big play against Arizona. By the time it finally happened I remembered that I wanted UW to lose that game.
Earlier this year someone ran a poll about Huskies who didn't meet expectations. I totally forgot about Tank Johnson. Early on I honestly thought he was going to be a NFL first rounder.