Ruth was right

RaceBannon

RaceBannon

Moderator
Staff member
Swaye's Wigwam
Founder's Club
Ginsburg Opinion Could Aid Trump in N.Y. Fraud Case
The prohibition embodied in the Excessive Fines Clause carries forward protections found in sources from Magna Carta to the English Bill of Rights to state constitutions from the colonial era to the present day," Ginsburg argued in the case. "Protection against excessive fines has been a constant shield throughout Anglo-American history for good reason: Such fines undermine other liberties."
Ginsburg added that such fines "can be used, e.g., to retaliate against or chill the speech of political enemies."
 
The DA keeps posting updated fine amounts each day with the accrued interest as they attempt to bankrupt Trump because of politics..
These are people who cannot be reasoned with and should be viewed as religious extremists on par with any group of nut jobs trying to harm those unlike them by “othering” and demonizing them.
 
EverettChris said:
The DA keeps posting updated fine amounts each day with the accrued interest as they attempt to bankrupt Trump because of politics..
These are people who cannot be reasoned with and should be viewed as religious extremists on par with any group of nut jobs trying to harm those unlike them by “othering” and demonizing them.
Click to expand...
8th ammendment has something to say about this commie ruse.
 
HHusky said:
"Very small amount of money.” Allegedly.
Click to expand...
”Fuck the 8th Amendment because Leftism is my secular cult.”
James and Judge Bilbo Baggins are no different than any other political extremists, except these crazed zealots got into power and have freedom to abuse it for now.
 
Last edited:
"When calculating fines, courts must consider the defendant’s financial resources and the burden of the fine to the defendant, as discussed in United States v. United Mine Workers, 330 U.S. 258 (1947). "
I'm told Daddy is "really rich."
 
HHusky said:
"When calculating fines, courts must consider the defendant’s financial resources and the burden of the fine to the defendant, as discussed in United States v. United Mine Workers, 330 U.S. 258 (1947). "
I'm told Daddy is "really rich."
Click to expand...
Name a similar fine for not comitting a crime.
 
HHusky said:
"When calculating fines, courts must consider the defendant’s financial resources and the burden of the fine to the defendant, as discussed in United States v. United Mine Workers, 330 U.S. 258 (1947). "
I'm told Daddy is "really rich."
Click to expand...
Half a billion isn't a burden

Says noted dumbfuck
 
There is literally no victim in this crime and Trump employed thousands of taxpaying workers on his projects and properties for decades. Then lawyers get involved and the Left applauds it because they, like HHusky, are in a cult where “othering” is standard demonizing.
Exactly what did Trump do as President that would elicit they was the UniParty treats them other than to call out all of the corruption and bullshit? Seriously, what did he do? This is far beyond normal, rational political discourse.
 
Last edited:
HHusky said:
Sledog said:
HHusky said:
"When calculating fines, courts must consider the defendant’s financial resources and the burden of the fine to the defendant, as discussed in United States v. United Mine Workers, 330 U.S. 258 (1947). "
I'm told Daddy is "really rich."
Click to expand...
Name a similar fine for not comitting a crime.
Click to expand...
FTC Imposes $5 Billion Penalty and Sweeping New Privacy Restrictions on Facebook
Click to expand...
Yes, there were actually victims here.
Dunce Cap is comparing the federal government fining a global corporation for violating privacy rights to Donald Trump taking out re-paid loans approved by banks. Loans that ultimately added people working for Trump projects and properties who paid NY state taxes.
This is stupid even for you, H.
 
I'm not a fan of the FTC

I hate Facebook so I never signed up

Sell that Zuckerberg
 
EverettChris said:
HHusky said:
Sledog said:
HHusky said:
"When calculating fines, courts must consider the defendant’s financial resources and the burden of the fine to the defendant, as discussed in United States v. United Mine Workers, 330 U.S. 258 (1947). "
I'm told Daddy is "really rich."
Click to expand...
Name a similar fine for not comitting a crime.
Click to expand...
FTC Imposes $5 Billion Penalty and Sweeping New Privacy Restrictions on Facebook
Click to expand...
Yes, there were actually victims here.
Dunce Cap is comparing the federal government fining a global corporation for violating privacy rights to Donald Trump taking out re-paid loans approved by banks. Loans that ultimately added people working for Trump projects and properties who paid NY state taxes.
This is stupid even for you, H.
Click to expand...
Your quarrel is with the statute enacted in the1950s, by a Republican controlled New York legislature. Apparently, they believed lying to lenders was deserving of punishment.
 
And the damages were what again? Court awards have to bear some due process connection to the actual damages. It's almost like you have a hypothetical law degree. The only good thing for New York will be the flight of capital from the reach of New York courts.
 
Facebook Market cap in 2019 was $585B so less than a 1% fine for the crime of "deceiving users about their ability to control the privacy of their personal information"

Vs Trump fine of $464M on estimated net worth of $2.6B or 17.9% of his net worth for a crime that the "Victim" said would be happy to do the deal again.

So, apples to aardvarks
 
HHusky said:
Gasbag dropped out of law school before learning about disgorgement of ill-gotten gains.
Click to expand...
Hey, can I borrow money from you poor unsophisticated 80 year old widow JP Morgan with your army of MBAs (real MBAs) and real estate financial specialists who conducted their own detailed due diligence? Then pay it back and have the dazzler talk about ill-gotten gains? Is ill-gotten gains a legal term? Repaying a loan is an ill-gotten gain? You suck at this.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top