Here is my problem. With the hundreds of billions we are spending on vaccines why is the data so sh*tty. It's almost like the FDA, CDC and Big Pharma like sh*tty data. This study found a negative efficacy rate for the latest flu wonder vaccine. The study may have had some flaws but for example why would vaccinated people get tested for the flu at a higher rate than unvaccinated? I would think if you though the vaccine was effective why go get tested. But one researcher found the opposite.
Why are there no double blind testing going on on these vaccines so we have actual good data to look at? Right now, the local news is harping constantly about the lowering rate of measles vaccinations. Like with the chicom crud, if the vaccination is truly effective, why worry about the unvaccinated by scaring the vaxxed that they are at risk from the unvaccinated.
Why are there no double blind testing going on on these vaccines so we have actual good data to look at? Right now, the local news is harping constantly about the lowering rate of measles vaccinations. Like with the chicom crud, if the vaccination is truly effective, why worry about the unvaccinated by scaring the vaxxed that they are at risk from the unvaccinated.