Rittenhouse verdict

Whenever the Dazzler has really stuck his head up his ass, like he did in this thread, he'll always look to change the topic and then start talking about that. Amazing what a mouthy Kunt Dazzler can become after he losing his voice earlier in the thread.
 
Whenever the Dazzler has really stuck his head up his ass, like he did in this thread, he'll always look to change the topic and then start talking about that. Amazing what a mouthy Kunt Dazzler can become after he losing his voice earlier in the thread.
Click to expand...

Or goes off the rails. History.
 
Whenever the Dazzler has really stuck his head up his ass, like he did in this thread, he'll always look to change the topic and then start talking about that. Amazing what a mouthy Kunt Dazzler can become after he losing his voice earlier in the thread.
Click to expand...

Laryngitis?

Weird take.
 
Soft brain & short fuse is a bad combo. Seen that implosion before.
Click to expand...

True. Close up.
Click to expand...

Notice you didn't want to define conservatives for us.

I can't imagine why that is.
Click to expand...

But you don’t have a dog in the fight.
Click to expand...

Maybe I do since you won't define it.

Curious minds want to know.

I'm sure your astute political science takes will be as informed as your economic ones.
 
The topic of this thread is: Notice how there isn’t a single leftist here supporting this verdict?[/b] So, thanks for your post which you felt necessary to make which doesn't change Bob's observations. You suck at this.

"The only comment I think I've ever made related to this case was to agree that the prosecutor was appropriately chastised by the judge."
Click to expand...

Verdicts happen in cases that I didn't follow closely every day.

I support verdicts being entered.

I particularly support jurors acquitting criminal defendants when they have reasonable doubts about their guilt.

So glad I could clarify this for you, Gasbag.

Bray on!
Click to expand...

You clarified nothing with that word salad of yours. Glad you never followed the case. It was so damn complicated what with the video and the eyewitness on one side and all the lying on the other side.
Click to expand...

For some reason it fascinated you ladies and lots of other people. Not me.

Some people follow NASCAR too.

Not really a question of whether it's complicated.
Click to expand...

Still obsessing over Mike Brown but just no interest in this one

Lies flow like water in the rain
Click to expand...

Police shooting. Multiple changes in the cop's story.

It interested me.

Vigilante shoots a few rioters? Similar to Pitch, I dislike everyone involved.
Click to expand...

Yeah no one believes you
Click to expand...

Surprised my name even came up then.

As you were.
Click to expand...

Soft brain & short fuse is a bad combo. Seen that implosion before.
Click to expand...

True. Close up.
Click to expand...

Notice you didn't want to define conservatives for us.

I can't imagine why that is.
Click to expand...

But you don’t have a dog in the fight.
Click to expand...

Does UW_Doog_Bot intimidate the Counselor much?

Question too tough?
 
Soft brain & short fuse is a bad combo. Seen that implosion before.
Click to expand...

True. Close up.
Click to expand...

Notice you didn't want to define conservatives for us.

I can't imagine why that is.
Click to expand...

But you don’t have a dog in the fight.
Click to expand...

Maybe I do since you won't define it.

Curious minds want to know.

I'm sure your astute political science takes will be as informed as your economic ones.
Click to expand...

So you’re desperately seeking to be interesting.

It’s not working.
 
15 pages in and someone doesn’t want to admit the role CNN, MSNBC, Joe Biden, and the Democrats played in getting the rittenhouse case, trial, and verdict wrong. Sad.
 
Soft brain & short fuse is a bad combo. Seen that implosion before.
Click to expand...

True. Close up.
Click to expand...

Notice you didn't want to define conservatives for us.

I can't imagine why that is.
Click to expand...

But you don’t have a dog in the fight.
Click to expand...

Maybe I do since you won't define it.

Curious minds want to know.

I'm sure your astute political science takes will be as informed as your economic ones.
Click to expand...

So you’re desperately seeking to be interesting.

It’s not working.
Click to expand...

You’ve never been one to run and hide.

Time to dazzle everyone with that UW law degree and MBA you’re so proud of.

Oh wait, Doog_Bot has embarrassed you when you’ve engaged with him before.
 
Last edited:
Soft brain & short fuse is a bad combo. Seen that implosion before.
Click to expand...

True. Close up.
Click to expand...

Notice you didn't want to define conservatives for us.

I can't imagine why that is.
Click to expand...

But you don’t have a dog in the fight.
Click to expand...

Maybe I do since you won't define it.

Curious minds want to know.

I'm sure your astute political science takes will be as informed as your economic ones.
Click to expand...

So you’re desperately seeking to be interesting.

It’s not working.
Click to expand...

15 pages in and someone doesn’t want to admit the role CNN, MSNBC, Joe Biden, and the Democrats played in getting the rittenhouse case, trial, and verdict wrong. Sad.
Click to expand...

It wasn’t interesting, that’s why What’s His Name is 15 pages deep.

Meltdown still rolling
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top