Be it Dawgman or anybody else. I've had to delete 3 threads since yesterday with people posting other people's content. If you wish to address something, summarize it in your own words.
Istalkpay it forward for blondes atRenton Highlands StarbucksSkippers - Kim
Does that include quoting Fatters?
Does that include quoting Fatters?
If you're quoting a sentence or two, especially from a presser, that's fine. But no cutting and pasting of people's articles and such.
Does that include quoting Fatters?
If you're quoting a sentence or two, especially from a presser, that's fine. But no cutting and pasting of people's articles and such.
Will we get a warning..?
Be it Dawgman or anybody else. I've had to delete 3 threads since yesterday with people posting other people's content. If you wish to address something, summarize it in your own words.
It seems like you can draw content under fair use laws. I mean, if you copy a couple of sentences from dawgman and then comment upon them that is perfectly fine. The burden of proof would be on dawgman. He could try it, but fair use is important...