HHusky
Active poster
I’m not going to invest the effort. [/i][/b] Who really[/b] did it?
When have you ever?
Contrails occupies all my time.
Birds aren’t real.
I’m not going to invest the effort. [/i][/b] Who really[/b] did it?
When have you ever?
https://youtu.be/HIBG_InCKKI
*In before this is nuked by youtube
Brush up on what it takes to demolish a building. It will keep you from poasting stupid shit like this.
Must.
Defend.
Narrative.
There is no narrative. Just use your common sense?
Common sense questions for dummies.
What does it mean to “pull the building”?
From the moment that decision is made, how long does it take from start to finish - on average?
Please tell us all you know about what it takes to “demolish a building” as you alluded to in a previous post
They were talking about pulling the firefighters from the building because it was too dangerous.

I’m not going to invest the effort. [/i][/b] Who really[/b] did it?
When have you ever?
Contrails occupies all my time.
Birds aren’t real.
Where do the 800,000 missing/abducted children go every year?Good grief.
The plane that hit the Pentagon was witnessed by drivers. I love the lunatic showing the grainy pick of the “scud missile” sounding so believable.
The plane turned into a molten ball as it tore through the building. Shocking there was nothing left.
To some.
I didn't guarantee the authenticity of the video, I merely asked if it the timing was coincidence with the redacted piece.
Fwiw your molten ball theory doesn't cut the mustard.
The wings would have sheared And the engines would have been left outside.....or
The hole in the building does not jive with the damage that would have been caused if the engines had entered the building.
An engine was discovered but was not anywhere near the size of the reported planes engines.
You should probably do a little more research.
There is evidence that contradicts those "witness" accounts.
So where is Barbara Olson? And the molten theory only makes sense to non-conspiracy theorists.
Why does the reporter at the scene clearly state there is no evidence a plane crashed into the pentagon.
He doesn't mention a molten ball that could have been a plane either.
You are a big boy, Im not going to answer your questions because you wont believe anything I say about it anyway.
You have to go look and find the truth for yourself..or not.
https://youtu.be/HIBG_InCKKI
*In before this is nuked by youtube
Brush up on what it takes to demolish a building. It will keep you from poasting stupid shit like this.
Must.
Defend.
Narrative.
There is no narrative. Just use your common sense?
Common sense questions for dummies.
What does it mean to “pull the building”?
From the moment that decision is made, how long does it take from start to finish - on average?
Please tell us all you know about what it takes to “demolish a building” as you alluded to in a previous post
Good grief.
The plane that hit the Pentagon was witnessed by drivers. I love the lunatic showing the grainy pick of the “scud missile” sounding so believable.
The plane turned into a molten ball as it tore through the building. Shocking there was nothing left.
To some.
I didn't guarantee the authenticity of the video, I merely asked if it the timing was coincidence with the redacted piece.
Fwiw your molten ball theory doesn't cut the mustard.
The wings would have sheared And the engines would have been left outside.....or
The hole in the building does not jive with the damage that would have been caused if the engines had entered the building.
An engine was discovered but was not anywhere near the size of the reported planes engines.
You should probably do a little more research.
There is evidence that contradicts those "witness" accounts.
Exactly. Where the fuck are the engines? A ball of steel the size of a VW Beetle doesn’t just disintegrate. You would need a nuclear explosion for that.
Further, why did the FBI go confiscate 80+ surveillance videos around the pentagon and destroy them? Then release basically a half-dozen grainy frames that don’t really show anything?
You’re really defending short-bus riders everywhere today.
Where do the 800,000 missing/abducted children go every year?Good grief.
The plane that hit the Pentagon was witnessed by drivers. I love the lunatic showing the grainy pick of the “scud missile” sounding so believable.
The plane turned into a molten ball as it tore through the building. Shocking there was nothing left.
To some.
I didn't guarantee the authenticity of the video, I merely asked if it the timing was coincidence with the redacted piece.
Fwiw your molten ball theory doesn't cut the mustard.
The wings would have sheared And the engines would have been left outside.....or
The hole in the building does not jive with the damage that would have been caused if the engines had entered the building.
An engine was discovered but was not anywhere near the size of the reported planes engines.
You should probably do a little more research.
There is evidence that contradicts those "witness" accounts.
So where is Barbara Olson? And the molten theory only makes sense to non-conspiracy theorists.
Why does the reporter at the scene clearly state there is no evidence a plane crashed into the pentagon.
He doesn't mention a molten ball that could have been a plane either.
You are a big boy, Im not going to answer your questions because you wont believe anything I say about it anyway.
You have to go look and find the truth for yourself..or not.
Where do the 800,000 missing/abducted children go every year?Good grief.
The plane that hit the Pentagon was witnessed by drivers. I love the lunatic showing the grainy pick of the “scud missile” sounding so believable.
The plane turned into a molten ball as it tore through the building. Shocking there was nothing left.
To some.
I didn't guarantee the authenticity of the video, I merely asked if it the timing was coincidence with the redacted piece.
Fwiw your molten ball theory doesn't cut the mustard.
The wings would have sheared And the engines would have been left outside.....or
The hole in the building does not jive with the damage that would have been caused if the engines had entered the building.
An engine was discovered but was not anywhere near the size of the reported planes engines.
You should probably do a little more research.
There is evidence that contradicts those "witness" accounts.
So where is Barbara Olson? And the molten theory only makes sense to non-conspiracy theorists.
Why does the reporter at the scene clearly state there is no evidence a plane crashed into the pentagon.
He doesn't mention a molten ball that could have been a plane either.
You are a big boy, Im not going to answer your questions because you wont believe anything I say about it anyway.
You have to go look and find the truth for yourself..or not.
Educated yourself on the trajectory of a scud missile and their history of not being accurate.
But sure, they fired one at ground level and scored a direct hit on the Pentagon.
Conspiracy nuts can create the narrative evidence to fit their insane theories.
A witness saw the plane clip a light pole on the freeway.
Who could have guessed Pawz is a conspiracy nut?
Where do the 800,000 missing/abducted children go every year?Good grief.
The plane that hit the Pentagon was witnessed by drivers. I love the lunatic showing the grainy pick of the “scud missile” sounding so believable.
The plane turned into a molten ball as it tore through the building. Shocking there was nothing left.
To some.
I didn't guarantee the authenticity of the video, I merely asked if it the timing was coincidence with the redacted piece.
Fwiw your molten ball theory doesn't cut the mustard.
The wings would have sheared And the engines would have been left outside.....or
The hole in the building does not jive with the damage that would have been caused if the engines had entered the building.
An engine was discovered but was not anywhere near the size of the reported planes engines.
You should probably do a little more research.
There is evidence that contradicts those "witness" accounts.
So where is Barbara Olson? And the molten theory only makes sense to non-conspiracy theorists.
Why does the reporter at the scene clearly state there is no evidence a plane crashed into the pentagon.
He doesn't mention a molten ball that could have been a plane either.
You are a big boy, Im not going to answer your questions because you wont believe anything I say about it anyway.
You have to go look and find the truth for yourself..or not.
I can’t help it if you want to believe nutcases.
Here’s the truth. And AA was hijacked.https://youtu.be/HIBG_InCKKI
*In before this is nuked by youtube
Brush up on what it takes to demolish a building. It will keep you from poasting stupid shit like this.
Must.
Defend.
Narrative.
There is no narrative. Just use your common sense?
Common sense questions for dummies.
What does it mean to “pull the building”?
From the moment that decision is made, how long does it take from start to finish - on average?
Please tell us all you know about what it takes to “demolish a building” as you alluded to in a previous post
3 months. [/i][/b] Just for shit and giggles catch a docu on what it takes to prepare a high rise for demo.
Did any of you ever watch what it took to bring the Kingdome down?
Good.
Fucking
Grief.
Who could have guessed Pawz is a conspiracy nut?
Me
Where do the 800,000 missing/abducted children go every year?Good grief.
The plane that hit the Pentagon was witnessed by drivers. I love the lunatic showing the grainy pick of the “scud missile” sounding so believable.
The plane turned into a molten ball as it tore through the building. Shocking there was nothing left.
To some.
I didn't guarantee the authenticity of the video, I merely asked if it the timing was coincidence with the redacted piece.
Fwiw your molten ball theory doesn't cut the mustard.
The wings would have sheared And the engines would have been left outside.....or
The hole in the building does not jive with the damage that would have been caused if the engines had entered the building.
An engine was discovered but was not anywhere near the size of the reported planes engines.
You should probably do a little more research.
There is evidence that contradicts those "witness" accounts.
So where is Barbara Olson? And the molten theory only makes sense to non-conspiracy theorists.
Why does the reporter at the scene clearly state there is no evidence a plane crashed into the pentagon.
He doesn't mention a molten ball that could have been a plane either.
You are a big boy, Im not going to answer your questions because you wont believe anything I say about it anyway.
You have to go look and find the truth for yourself..or not.
Educated yourself on the trajectory of a scud missile and their history of not being accurate.
But sure, they fired one at ground level and scored a direct hit on the Pentagon.
Conspiracy nuts can create the narrative evidence to fit their insane theories.
A witness saw the plane clip a light pole on the freeway.
The woman in the video called it a scud missile, I didn't...go argue with her.
Where do the 800,000 missing/abducted children go every year?Good grief.
The plane that hit the Pentagon was witnessed by drivers. I love the lunatic showing the grainy pick of the “scud missile” sounding so believable.
The plane turned into a molten ball as it tore through the building. Shocking there was nothing left.
To some.
I didn't guarantee the authenticity of the video, I merely asked if it the timing was coincidence with the redacted piece.
Fwiw your molten ball theory doesn't cut the mustard.
The wings would have sheared And the engines would have been left outside.....or
The hole in the building does not jive with the damage that would have been caused if the engines had entered the building.
An engine was discovered but was not anywhere near the size of the reported planes engines.
You should probably do a little more research.
There is evidence that contradicts those "witness" accounts.
So where is Barbara Olson? And the molten theory only makes sense to non-conspiracy theorists.
Why does the reporter at the scene clearly state there is no evidence a plane crashed into the pentagon.
He doesn't mention a molten ball that could have been a plane either.
You are a big boy, Im not going to answer your questions because you wont believe anything I say about it anyway.
You have to go look and find the truth for yourself..or not.
I can’t help it if you want to believe nutcases.
Here’s the truth. And AA was hijacked.https://youtu.be/HIBG_InCKKI
*In before this is nuked by youtube
Brush up on what it takes to demolish a building. It will keep you from poasting stupid shit like this.
Must.
Defend.
Narrative.
There is no narrative. Just use your common sense?
Common sense questions for dummies.
What does it mean to “pull the building”?
From the moment that decision is made, how long does it take from start to finish - on average?
Please tell us all you know about what it takes to “demolish a building” as you alluded to in a previous post
3 months. [/i][/b] Just for shit and giggles catch a docu on what it takes to prepare a high rise for demo.
Did any of you ever watch what it took to bring the Kingdome down?
Good.
Fucking
Grief.
Exactly. EXACTLY.
You have the man who owned the WTC on camera a week after the event admitting “we decided to pull the building”.
Then you have your own fucking eyeballs watching a perfect textbook implosion.
If it takes 3 fucking months, then it was planned. Period. End of story.
What more do you need Liz Cheney?
Where do the 800,000 missing/abducted children go every year?Good grief.
The plane that hit the Pentagon was witnessed by drivers. I love the lunatic showing the grainy pick of the “scud missile” sounding so believable.
The plane turned into a molten ball as it tore through the building. Shocking there was nothing left.
To some.
I didn't guarantee the authenticity of the video, I merely asked if it the timing was coincidence with the redacted piece.
Fwiw your molten ball theory doesn't cut the mustard.
The wings would have sheared And the engines would have been left outside.....or
The hole in the building does not jive with the damage that would have been caused if the engines had entered the building.
An engine was discovered but was not anywhere near the size of the reported planes engines.
You should probably do a little more research.
There is evidence that contradicts those "witness" accounts.
So where is Barbara Olson? And the molten theory only makes sense to non-conspiracy theorists.
Why does the reporter at the scene clearly state there is no evidence a plane crashed into the pentagon.
He doesn't mention a molten ball that could have been a plane either.
You are a big boy, Im not going to answer your questions because you wont believe anything I say about it anyway.
You have to go look and find the truth for yourself..or not.
I can’t help it if you want to believe nutcases.
Here’s the truth. And AA was hijacked.https://youtu.be/HIBG_InCKKI
*In before this is nuked by youtube
Brush up on what it takes to demolish a building. It will keep you from poasting stupid shit like this.
Must.
Defend.
Narrative.
There is no narrative. Just use your common sense?
Common sense questions for dummies.
What does it mean to “pull the building”?
From the moment that decision is made, how long does it take from start to finish - on average?
Please tell us all you know about what it takes to “demolish a building” as you alluded to in a previous post
3 months. [/i][/b] Just for shit and giggles catch a docu on what it takes to prepare a high rise for demo.
Did any of you ever watch what it took to bring the Kingdome down?
Good.
Fucking
Grief.
Exactly. EXACTLY.
You have the man who owned the WTC on camera a week after the event admitting “we decided to pull the building”.
Then you have your own fucking eyeballs watching a perfect textbook implosion.
If it takes 3 fucking months, then it was planned. Period. End of story.
What more do you need Liz Cheney?
Dear lord you really believe it was demolished.
I’m sorry.