Recruiting IQ Test #2: How realistic are you?

Recruiting IQ Test #2: How realistic are you?

  • No - WE HAVE SO MANY DISADVANTAGES, PETE AND OKGS, PLUS WE DON'T EVEN WANT TO!

    Votes: 8 14.3%

  • Yes - We are likely to sign top 3 players at almost every position in the West this year, why couldn

    Votes: 45 80.4%

  • I'm Not Sure - I bought into the bullshit that recruiting wasn't important on HH during the Sark era

    Votes: 3 5.4%
  • Total voters
    56
Answer key:

No - IQ of 12. You should light yourself on fire and take a rocket into the sun.
Yes - IQ of 115+. Good, you can stay. You understand that there are no excuses for shitty classes. We need good players, period.
I'm Not Sure - IQ of 115 or below. In order for this species to survive, we can only have the cream of the crop. Kill yourself.
 
source.gif

 
I am not voting in this poll because I am not sure of the right answer.
Click to expand...

There is literally an answer 'not sure'. I'm going to suggest an IP ban.
Click to expand...

Fine, you peer pressured me to vote for the "I'm not sure" option. Please let the record show that my vote was under duress.
 
Last edited:
Can't take years off either

Need to stack top 15 classes and league titles like cord wood to get to the top of the nation

And it's a long way

To the top

If you want to rock and roll
 
We still let Bob Gregory recruit LBs to play behind Malloe’s DT’s and in front of Lakes secondary.

We launched Chris Strausser, CFB’s best tactical and development OL coach, for Huff. We traded Pete’s bosom buddy, Brent Pease, for unproven Matt Lubick and we keep a RB coach who prefers working beef over upgrading Kamari Pleasant and our new power back, Sean McGrew.

Considering my sub 116 IQ, I’m obviously missing something...
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top