Real Talk
- Thread starter pawz
- Start date
From Wikipedia on Dr. Judith Curry:
In his 2010 profile on Curry, journalist Michael Lemonick reported that Curry began paying attention to outsider climate blogs after they attacked a 2005 paper she co-authored,[16] which related increasing hurricane strength to global warming. Rather than dismissing their comments, she had discussions with attackers including Christopher Landsea and Pat Michaels. She began participating in outsider blogs such as Climate Audit, where she found the discussions very interesting, as opposed to "preaching to the converted" at mainstream climate science blog RealClimate. Despite the amount of what she describes as "crankology," she thought the time was well spent to avoid groupthink.[/i]
Imagine actually discussing viewpoints opposed to your own and then rethinking your positions base don new ideas or evidence. Imagine that. The left cannot even fathom it.
In his 2010 profile on Curry, journalist Michael Lemonick reported that Curry began paying attention to outsider climate blogs after they attacked a 2005 paper she co-authored,[16] which related increasing hurricane strength to global warming. Rather than dismissing their comments, she had discussions with attackers including Christopher Landsea and Pat Michaels. She began participating in outsider blogs such as Climate Audit, where she found the discussions very interesting, as opposed to "preaching to the converted" at mainstream climate science blog RealClimate. Despite the amount of what she describes as "crankology," she thought the time was well spent to avoid groupthink.[/i]
Imagine actually discussing viewpoints opposed to your own and then rethinking your positions base don new ideas or evidence. Imagine that. The left cannot even fathom it.
TurdBomber
Active poster
From Wikipedia on Dr. Judith Curry:
In his 2010 profile on Curry, journalist Michael Lemonick reported that Curry began paying attention to outsider climate blogs after they attacked a 2005 paper she co-authored,[16] which related increasing hurricane strength to global warming. Rather than dismissing their comments, she had discussions with attackers including Christopher Landsea and Pat Michaels. She began participating in outsider blogs such as Climate Audit, where she found the discussions very interesting, as opposed to "preaching to the converted" at mainstream climate science blog RealClimate. Despite the amount of what she describes as "crankology," she thought the time was well spent to avoid groupthink.[/i]
Imagine actually discussing viewpoints opposed to your own and then rethinking your positions base don new ideas or evidence. Imagine that. The left cannot even fathom it.
Almost every woman I know, without exception, including my wife and daughter, default to emotional decision-making and say things to me like "oh, you're such a man" when I do something like pull over to get gas on the way to the airport, when the "fuel low" light in their car has been on for three days.
Thank God they are persuadable and CAN think logically, but their default setting is just the opposite.
Last edited:
