Rate coaches since James

I still can't figure out why Neuiheisel was such a bad coach at UCLA. Especially since he had Norm Chow as OC.
He inherited a very untalented team from Dorrell which put him in a hole from the start, he never could find a QB worth a shit and he had an old worn out Chow installing the WCO when the sport was moving away from it.

He's also a mediocre coach. His team quit on him at the end.

Nothing more needed to be said. I like Neuheisel, but the Noogs in here get a bit carried away. He's a broadcaster and not a coach for good reason. @Dennis_DeYoung nailed it, so did @BearsWiin.
 
Last edited:
1) Petersen. And it's not close. He took over a team with the same amount of talent as the Owen 12 team. Decided to clean house and has the program in the best position since the 90s, outside of 1 good year by Neu.

2) Neu. He did a great job of changing the offense to fit Tui. But decided recruiting is overrated.

3) Lambo. He wasn't James, but he did keep some of the momentum going. It was frustrating a lot of years, but I liked how he had more balls than James to go for it at times.

4) Sark. His So Cal shtick sucked and his lame attempts to bring hype failed. He never realized you bring hype by winning, not by holding recruits for signing day surprise.

5) Gilby. Enough said

6) Ty. Fuck him. He couldn't win at Notre Dame and he wasn't going to win at UW. I appreciated nothing about him.
 
1) Petersen. And it's not close. He took over a team with the same amount of talent as the Owen 12 team. Decided to clean house and has the program in the best position since the 90s, outside of 1 good year by Neu.

2) Neu. He did a great job of changing the offense to fit Tui. But decided recruiting is overrated.

3) Lambo. He wasn't James, but he did keep some of the momentum going. It was frustrating a lot of years, but I liked how he had more balls than James to go for it at times.

4) Sark. His So Cal shtick sucked and his lame attempts to bring hype failed. He never realized you bring hype by winning, not by holding recruits for signing day surprise.

5) Gilby. Enough said

6) Ty. Fuck him. He couldn't win at Notre Dame and he wasn't going to win at UW. I appreciated nothing about him.

Thread ruined. You're a fucking idiot.
 
I think Petersen is better than Sark. I think.

They both fucking suck, though.

It's proven than both Petersen and Sarkisian can have a whole bunch of 7-6 seasons. However it's not proven that Petersen can take a program from 0-12 to 7-6. That's why I'm rating Sark higher even though they both are awful.

Petersen does have time to prove he doesn't suck. But as of right now he sucks.

UW was never a 0-12 program. It was a 4 win team that lost its best player to injury and quit on its lame duck coach. Fuck you for giving Sark credit for that. Bet you give him credit for 9 wins too.
 
Pete
Neu
Lambo
Sark
Ty
Gilby

I like what Petersen has done so far in terms of gutting the culture and getting the pussies out of here. Now it's time for him to win. This list could look drastically different next year.
 
1) Petersen. And it's not close. He took over a team with the same amount of talent as the Owen 12 team. Decided to clean house and has the program in the best position since the 90s, outside of 1 good year by Neu.

2) Neu. He did a great job of changing the offense to fit Tui. But decided recruiting is overrated.

3) Lambo. He wasn't James, but he did keep some of the momentum going. It was frustrating a lot of years, but I liked how he had more balls than James to go for it at times.

4) Sark. His So Cal shtick sucked and his lame attempts to bring hype failed. He never realized you bring hype by winning, not by holding recruits for signing day surprise.

5) Gilby. Enough said

6) Ty. Fuck him. He couldn't win at Notre Dame and he wasn't going to win at UW. I appreciated nothing about him.

Thread ruined. You're a fucking idiot.

FO, D.
 
Back
Top