Except maybe the Husky coaches with the avalanche bearing down on them.
Whatever the fuck that means.
It means you're sniffing Stanford's jock and counting their wins over Oregon as your own.
I said they've done well against both UO and UW and you shit yourself. You know, they won multiple rose bowls too and were a barrier to the North this decade. Dipshit.
And I say that Washington football has been crap for nearly 25 years with just a few years of exception and you start talking about Stanford. Hey I get it, I wouldn't want to talk about UW either.
And you dodge how shit tier Oregon is at everything but sports, with 0 championships still and less conference championships recently than UW.
And I never said UW football has been amazing at football the last 25 years.
But to somehow act like you're SEC West with desolating losses to the likes of Stanford (no support) and WSU (no money, terrible recruiting) is fs. Your two worst losses in for fucking ever came at the hands of UW (there's your plug) and fucking Utah, both at home.
I don't think anyone seriously thinks Oregon is SEC West.
I think it's a broad generalization to say Oregon is shit-tier at everything but sports. But, to the extent you want to make that claim, you have to throw pretty much all the schools in the conference except for the Cali schools in the toilet with them.
My point is, what's the point in saying Oregon is shit-tier in non-sports in a sports convo? Do we make that point when arguing with the people from the Zona schools? Oregon State? Cuog (actually, never mind on that one).
Overall history in FB favors UW. Overall history for the last 25 years unquestionably favors Oregon.
They have a coach now that's showing flashes of promise. That's about all anyone can say.