Russia has nukes? Oh my God! What were we thinking?And we are supposed to keep paying for that? What if Putin decides enough is enough and uses tactical nukes... then what...Russia involved in a meat grinder conflict. What part of me calling that a good thing did you fail to grasp?
Hamas picked the fight. Soon they won't exist.Who picked this fight? Daddy can't say it. Can you?War mongerRussia in a quagmire on its own border is a great thing. Not wasteful.We have sent approx 150 billion in weaponry and dollars to Ukraine. That is about 33% of the total bill and we aren't on the same continent. If somehow we are now the enemy after demanding an end to the war, cut it all off and let the EU's foot the entire bill. If the EU's were serious about this war they wouldn't be buying Russian NG or importing oil. It is so fucked up what they are doing.
The war is not winnable, and we have no business wasting our money there. Get out. Make Ukraine's neighbors deal with it.
Why in the world does anyone here want this to end?
Don't interrupt your enemy when he's making a mistake.
Daddy is bailing Vlad out. Fuck him.
https://nebraskaexaminer.com/2025/03/02/nebraskas-bacon-on-60-minutes-says-trump-wrong-to-appease-putin/What does ”appeasing” Russia mean, Big Brain?
You’re the one cheerleading for even more death with the status quo.
Correct. They will look at Taiwan and see the vast semiconductor manufacturing dependency. That would be enough for China to realize that Ukraine not an apt analog. But you are incapable of nuance and an all around dumbfuck, so you'll disagree with some glib, inane comment because that's your only move@HFNY
China has to decide what it risks regarding Taiwan and its other ambitions. Best they believe we won’t just watch.
So nuanced that I'm not sure what you just said.Correct. They will look at Taiwan and see the vast semiconductor manufacturing dependency. That would be enough for China to realize that Ukraine not an apt analog. But you are incapable of nuance and an all around dumbfuck, so you'll disagree with some glib, inane comment because that's your only move@HFNY
China has to decide what it risks regarding Taiwan and its other ambitions. Best they believe we won’t just watch.
right on cueSo nuanced that I'm not sure what you just said.Correct. They will look at Taiwan and see the vast semiconductor manufacturing dependency. That would be enough for China to realize that Ukraine not an apt analog. But you are incapable of nuance and an all around dumbfuck, so you'll disagree with some glib, inane comment because that's your only move@HFNY
China has to decide what it risks regarding Taiwan and its other ambitions. Best they believe we won’t just watch.
disagree thenTLDR: If you think China will decide whether to invade Taiwan based on Ukraine, you are a moron
Why would China ignore what is a much different relationship between Taiwan and the US? The US absolutely needs Taiwan, at the very least until semiconductor fabs are established domestically. And even then, it's unlikely that TSMC, AIBT, etc. will consider moving their top end fabs (e.g., 2 nm, 1 nm) to the US to ensure long term success. There's also, of course, the fact that nobody wants this in the hands of China because it would put the US years behind china in semiconductor manufacturing, and by extension, defense technology.disagree thenTLDR: If you think China will decide whether to invade Taiwan based on Ukraine, you are a moron
and Daddy is being a helluva lot more equivocal than Joe was about what would happen next
If you’re a human trafficker, bio weapons producer or money launderer, Ukraine is the titsTaiwan has lots of strategic value to us, Ukraine does not.
Odd that Daddy wouldn't unequivocally say we'd use force then. Like Joe did.Why would China ignore what is a much different relationship between Taiwan and the US? The US absolutely needs Taiwan, at the very least until semiconductor fabs are established domestically. And even then, it's unlikely that TSMC, AIBT, etc. will consider moving their top end fabs (e.g., 2 nm, 1 nm) to the US to ensure long term success. There's also, of course, the fact that nobody wants this in the hands of China because it would put the US years behind china in semiconductor manufacturing, and by extension, defense technology.disagree thenTLDR: If you think China will decide whether to invade Taiwan based on Ukraine, you are a moron
and Daddy is being a helluva lot more equivocal than Joe was about what would happen next
Even semis aside, Taiwan is important for supply chains, anchors the US amongst neighboring allies, etc.
I'm sure you considered all this though.
Other than secret biolabs and money-laundering, of course.Taiwan has lots of strategic value to us, Ukraine does not.
Daddy isn't a warmongering profiteer like Joe. hthOdd that Daddy wouldn't unequivocally say we'd use force then. Like Joe did.Why would China ignore what is a much different relationship between Taiwan and the US? The US absolutely needs Taiwan, at the very least until semiconductor fabs are established domestically. And even then, it's unlikely that TSMC, AIBT, etc. will consider moving their top end fabs (e.g., 2 nm, 1 nm) to the US to ensure long term success. There's also, of course, the fact that nobody wants this in the hands of China because it would put the US years behind china in semiconductor manufacturing, and by extension, defense technology.disagree thenTLDR: If you think China will decide whether to invade Taiwan based on Ukraine, you are a moron
and Daddy is being a helluva lot more equivocal than Joe was about what would happen next
Even semis aside, Taiwan is important for supply chains, anchors the US amongst neighboring allies, etc.
I'm sure you considered all this though.