I've always followed recruiting from a distance... it's hard to get worked up over a 17 year old kid who has about a 25 percent chance of starting 2, 3, 4 years down the road.
Anyway my question is, do the big recruiting states (TX, CA, Floriduh) actually have more talent per capita than medium sized states like AZ, WA, CO etc.? Or do the big states just get all the hype because there's a large population and therefore there are a lot of high school football players?
Anyway my question is, do the big recruiting states (TX, CA, Floriduh) actually have more talent per capita than medium sized states like AZ, WA, CO etc.? Or do the big states just get all the hype because there's a large population and therefore there are a lot of high school football players?