Puka Nacua, 2019 4* WR, Orem, UT (Committed)

[HillsboroDuck]

Reconnected with a girl I banged 5 yeras ago on AOL Instant Messanger and she said that her roomates is 2nd cousins with Nacua and he is all UW.

Keep working those IM's, Cunt!

 

[LoneStarDawg]

Reconnected with a girl I banged 5 yeras ago on AOL Instant Messanger and she said that her roomates is 2nd cousins with Nacua and he is all UW.

A/S/L?!?!

 

[LaMichael_Corleone]

We are fucked.

 

[theknowledge]

Reconnected with a girl I banged 5 yeras ago on AOL Instant Messanger and she said that her roomates is 2nd cousins with Nacua and he is all UW.

Keep working those IM's, Cunt!

Keep working those cunts, Cunt!

 

[LaMichael_Corleone]

So, either Pete already went in-home (which I know for a fact he didn’t) or Scott Eklund is full of shit (which I also know for a fact) and needs to be fucking called out for it. First he said were gonnna go in home and wrap it up, then he said we aren’t going in home, then he says the Nacua-Pete in home already happened......?





This is one of the greatest Eklund contradiction examples because the answers were literally right next to each other.

 

[dirtysouwfdawg]

So, either Pete already went in-home (which I know for a fact he didn’t) or Scott Eklund is full of shit (which I also know for a fact) and needs to be fucking called out for it. First he said were gonnna go in home and wrap it up, then he said we aren’t going in home, then he says the Nacua-Pete in home already happened......?

View attachment 17599

View attachment 17600

This is one of the greatest Eklund contradiction examples because the answers were literally right next to each other.

So no one (especially ektard) knows WTF is going on??? Sounds about the norm.

 

[LaMichael_Corleone]

So, either Pete already went in-home (which I know for a fact he didn’t) or Scott Eklund is full of shit (which I also know for a fact) and needs to be fucking called out for it. First he said were gonnna go in home and wrap it up, then he said we aren’t going in home, then he says the Nacua-Pete in home already happened......?

View attachment 17599

View attachment 17600

This is one of the greatest Eklund contradiction examples because the answers were literally right next to each other.

So no one (especially ektard) knows WTF is going on??? Sounds about the norm.

Nah not really more just SE trying to cover his ass after the coaches gave him some BS that wasn’t true and now he’s trying to wiggle his way out of it.

 

[DoogCourics]

BigErn doing the dirty work.

Edit: Doesn’t Ektard just copy Roof? So he should have just said that Nacua was having a party and couldn’t fit Oete in. Get your shit together Ektard.

 

[UWhuskytskeet]

Eason started following him. Do your work Skinny!

View attachment 1194

 

[dirtysouwfdawg]

Eason started following him. Do your work Skinny!

View attachment 1194

This. Times a million %. You think he would’ve done more or we would’ve heard of more.

Hopefully huards working the back channels like Nate and Justin.

 

[tvoie]

So, either Pete already went in-home (which I know for a fact he didn’t) or Scott Eklund is full of shit (which I also know for a fact) and needs to be fucking called out for it. First he said were gonnna go in home and wrap it up, then he said we aren’t going in home, then he says the Nacua-Pete in home already happened......?

View attachment 17599

View attachment 17600

This is one of the greatest Eklund contradiction examples because the answers were literally right next to each other.

So no one (especially ektard) knows WTF is going on??? Sounds about the norm.

How dare you question Scott’s credentials as a respected journalist. This is honestly the stuff that makes this site so difficult to be a part of. Scott has been nothing short of stellar in his coverage of UW recruiting and you all constantly bring up the very few examples where he was slightly misguided in his analysis. These examples are not indicative of the hardworking, upstanding recruiting guru that is Scott Ecklund. You should all be ashamed of yourselves. We should all be a little more like Scott...

 

[CuntWaffle]

So, either Pete already went in-home (which I know for a fact he didn’t) or Scott Eklund is full of shit (which I also know for a fact) and needs to be fucking called out for it. First he said were gonnna go in home and wrap it up, then he said we aren’t going in home, then he says the Nacua-Pete in home already happened......?

View attachment 17599

View attachment 17600

This is one of the greatest Eklund contradiction examples because the answers were literally right next to each other.

So no one (especially ektard) knows WTF is going on??? Sounds about the norm.

How dare you question Scott’s credentials as a respected journalist. This is honestly the stuff that makes this site so difficult to be a part of. Scott has been nothing short of stellar in his coverage of UW recruiting and you all constantly bring up the very few examples where he was slightly misguided in his analysis. These examples are not indicative of the hardworking, upstanding recruiting guru that is Scott Ecklund. You should all be ashamed of yourselves. We should all be a little more like Scott...

Yup. If you guys start throwing out accusations then put your social security number and credit card info by them. Either that or you will be put in timeout. No warning, just gone.

 

[dirtysouwfdawg]

So, either Pete already went in-home (which I know for a fact he didn’t) or Scott Eklund is full of shit (which I also know for a fact) and needs to be fucking called out for it. First he said were gonnna go in home and wrap it up, then he said we aren’t going in home, then he says the Nacua-Pete in home already happened......?

View attachment 17599

View attachment 17600

This is one of the greatest Eklund contradiction examples because the answers were literally right next to each other.

So no one (especially ektard) knows WTF is going on??? Sounds about the norm.

How dare you question Scott’s credentials as a respected journalist. This is honestly the stuff that makes this site so difficult to be a part of. Scott has been nothing short of stellar in his coverage of UW recruiting and you all constantly bring up the very few examples where he was slightly misguided in his analysis. These examples are not indicative of the hardworking, upstanding recruiting guru that is Scott Ecklund. You should all be ashamed of yourselves. We should all be a little more like Scott...

Yup. If you guys start throwing out accusations then put your social security number and credit card info by them. Either that or you will be put in timeout. No warning, just gone.

Adult timeout?

 

[CallMeBigErn]

So, either Pete already went in-home (which I know for a fact he didn’t) or Scott Eklund is full of shit (which I also know for a fact) and needs to be fucking called out for it. First he said were gonnna go in home and wrap it up, then he said we aren’t going in home, then he says the Nacua-Pete in home already happened......?

View attachment 17599

View attachment 17600

This is one of the greatest Eklund contradiction examples because the answers were literally right next to each other.

Yes. I asked this question and I still don't know what the fuck answer I received. Pete either has already had an in-home, will have an in-home, or won't have an in-home. Your guess is as good as mine.

 

[insinceredawg]

So, either Pete already went in-home (which I know for a fact he didn’t) or Scott Eklund is full of shit (which I also know for a fact) and needs to be fucking called out for it. First he said were gonnna go in home and wrap it up, then he said we aren’t going in home, then he says the Nacua-Pete in home already happened......?

View attachment 17599

View attachment 17600

This is one of the greatest Eklund contradiction examples because the answers were literally right next to each other.

Yes. I asked this question and I still don't know what the fuck answer I received. Pete either has already had an in-home, will have an in-home, or won't have an in-home. Your guess is as good as mine.

TYFYS. Keep it up with the passive aggressiveness and ask when the in-home happened. Based on Scott's comments, it must have happened on Monday or Tuesday night.

 

[Meek]

So, either Pete already went in-home (which I know for a fact he didn’t) or Scott Eklund is full of shit (which I also know for a fact) and needs to be fucking called out for it. First he said were gonnna go in home and wrap it up, then he said we aren’t going in home, then he says the Nacua-Pete in home already happened......?

View attachment 17599

View attachment 17600

This is one of the greatest Eklund contradiction examples because the answers were literally right next to each other.

Yes. I asked this question and I still don't know what the fuck answer I received. Pete either has already had an in-home, will have an in-home, or won't have an in-home. Your guess is as good as mine.

$10.95!

 

[sinceredawg]

So no birthday parties?

 

[Swaye]

So, either Pete already went in-home (which I know for a fact he didn’t) or Scott Eklund is full of shit (which I also know for a fact) and needs to be fucking called out for it. First he said were gonnna go in home and wrap it up, then he said we aren’t going in home, then he says the Nacua-Pete in home already happened......?

View attachment 17599

View attachment 17600

This is one of the greatest Eklund contradiction examples because the answers were literally right next to each other.

I'd like to see you make sense of all of this when your kid has had the crud for six years.

 

[TommySQC]

So, either Pete already went in-home (which I know for a fact he didn’t) or Scott Eklund is full of shit (which I also know for a fact) and needs to be fucking called out for it. First he said were gonnna go in home and wrap it up, then he said we aren’t going in home, then he says the Nacua-Pete in home already happened......?

View attachment 17599

View attachment 17600

This is one of the greatest Eklund contradiction examples because the answers were literally right next to each other.

Yes. I asked this question and I still don't know what the fuck answer I received. Pete either has already had an in-home, will have an in-home, or won't have an in-home. Your guess is as good as mine.

$10.95!

*$12.95

 

[FireCohen]

So, either Pete already went in-home (which I know for a fact he didn’t) or Scott Eklund is full of shit (which I also know for a fact) and needs to be fucking called out for it. First he said were gonnna go in home and wrap it up, then he said we aren’t going in home, then he says the Nacua-Pete in home already happened......?

View attachment 17599

View attachment 17600

This is one of the greatest Eklund contradiction examples because the answers were literally right next to each other.

Yes. I asked this question and I still don't know what the fuck answer I received. Pete either has already had an in-home, will have an in-home, or won't have an in-home. Your guess is as good as mine.

$10.95!

*$12.95

Chinflation?