Predict whOregon's record

[RaceBannon]

Oklahomo?

 

[RoadDawg55]

I think they will be 8-4 or 9-4 like UW. Of course, one of those wins will be against UW.

 

[H_D]

I think they will be 8-4 or 9-4 like UW. Of course, one of those wins will be against UW.

Definition of playing both sides ...

If the record plays to not win the North, you can sit back and say that you were right ...

If they win the North, you'll doog quack up the victory, say that you underestimated this or that (moving the goal posts) and when you get called on being too pessimistic before the season just default into the "well, they had to prove it before I believed it" dismissiveness.

It's not that hard to understand ...

 

[Fenwick]

Already drinking beer so I am voting 11-1

 

[Fire_Marshall_Bill]

I forgot I started this poll. I got off work early and have been drinking ever since I got home. Cool story Bill

 

[PurpleJ]

They should be Chinwhoreable!!!!!!!!!

Their turn to go 0-12!!!!!

 

[Southerndawg]

Speaking of dooging I watched the Alamo Bowl and despite the outcome Oregon is still way more talented than we? are

They have more talent than I think they're being given credit for, but they weren't exactly dominant against the Huskies last year. They were a VAJ and a Babushka better. Way more talent is a stretch, and flat wrong when comparing defenses. Their defense last year sucked, ranked around 100th nationally. They got boat raced by Utah, lost to the Coogs at home and lost to TCU after running up a 31-0 lead. IMO, they were a VAJ away from being at best a 7-6 team last year.

This year hinges on North Dakota and Brady's fighting Hokes. They're set at RB and WR, the offensive line should be good, and they still have plenty of team speed. If their defense improves and Prokup becomes VAJ 2.0, they'll be a force in the conference. Otherwise, 7-6, 8-5 seems more reasonable.

 

[TierbsHsotBoobs]

Speaking of dooging I watched the Alamo Bowl and despite the outcome Oregon is still way more talented than we? are

They have more talent than I think they're being given credit for, but they weren't exactly dominant against the Huskies last year. They were a VAJ, a Peterman, and a Babushka better. Way more talent is a stretch, and flat wrong when comparing defenses. Their defense last year sucked, ranked around 100th nationally. They got boat raced by Utah, lost to the Coogs at home and lost to TCU after running up a 31-0 lead. IMO, they were a VAJ away from being at best a 7-6 team last year.

This year hinges on North Dakota and Brady's fighting Hokes. They're set at RB and WR, the offensive line should be good, and they still have plenty of team speed. If their defense improves and Prokup becomes VAJ 2.0, they'll be a force in the conference. Otherwise, 7-6, 8-5 seems more reasonable.

 

[greenblood]

Speaking of dooging I watched the Alamo Bowl and despite the outcome Oregon is still way more talented than we? are

They have more talent than I think they're being given credit for, but they weren't exactly dominant against the Huskies last year. They were a VAJ, a Peterman, and a Babushka better. Way more talent is a stretch, and flat wrong when comparing defenses. Their defense last year sucked, ranked around 100th nationally. They got boat raced by Utah, lost to the Coogs at home and lost to TCU after running up a 31-0 lead. IMO, they were a VAJ away from being at best a 7-6 team last year.

This year hinges on North Dakota and Brady's fighting Hokes. They're set at RB and WR, the offensive line should be good, and they still have plenty of team speed. If their defense improves and Prokup becomes VAJ 2.0, they'll be a force in the conference. Otherwise, 7-6, 8-5 seems more reasonable.

I'll still trade you straight up a Helfrich for a Peterman. What do you say?

 

[Southerndawg]

Speaking of dooging I watched the Alamo Bowl and despite the outcome Oregon is still way more talented than we? are

They have more talent than I think they're being given credit for, but they weren't exactly dominant against the Huskies last year. They were a VAJ, a Peterman, and a Babushka better. Way more talent is a stretch, and flat wrong when comparing defenses. Their defense last year sucked, ranked around 100th nationally. They got boat raced by Utah, lost to the Coogs at home and lost to TCU after running up a 31-0 lead. IMO, they were a VAJ away from being at best a 7-6 team last year.

This year hinges on North Dakota and Brady's fighting Hokes. They're set at RB and WR, the offensive line should be good, and they still have plenty of team speed. If their defense improves and Prokup becomes VAJ 2.0, they'll be a force in the conference. Otherwise, 7-6, 8-5 seems more reasonable.

I'll still trade you straight up a Helfrich for a Peterman. What do you say?

You're a smart Duck.

 

[TierbsHsotBoobs]

Speaking of dooging I watched the Alamo Bowl and despite the outcome Oregon is still way more talented than we? are

They have more talent than I think they're being given credit for, but they weren't exactly dominant against the Huskies last year. They were a VAJ, a Peterman, and a Babushka better. Way more talent is a stretch, and flat wrong when comparing defenses. Their defense last year sucked, ranked around 100th nationally. They got boat raced by Utah, lost to the Coogs at home and lost to TCU after running up a 31-0 lead. IMO, they were a VAJ away from being at best a 7-6 team last year.

This year hinges on North Dakota and Brady's fighting Hokes. They're set at RB and WR, the offensive line should be good, and they still have plenty of team speed. If their defense improves and Prokup becomes VAJ 2.0, they'll be a force in the conference. Otherwise, 7-6, 8-5 seems more reasonable.

I'll still trade you straight up a Carroll for a Riley. What do you say?

Helfraud sucks, but he's done more in the Pac-12 than Peterman has.

 

[IPukeOregonGrellow]

I'll still trade you straight up a Helfrich for a Peterman. What do you say?

No one wins when you choose between Billy Bobs.

 

[greenblood]

Speaking of dooging I watched the Alamo Bowl and despite the outcome Oregon is still way more talented than we? are

They have more talent than I think they're being given credit for, but they weren't exactly dominant against the Huskies last year. They were a VAJ, a Peterman, and a Babushka better. Way more talent is a stretch, and flat wrong when comparing defenses. Their defense last year sucked, ranked around 100th nationally. They got boat raced by Utah, lost to the Coogs at home and lost to TCU after running up a 31-0 lead. IMO, they were a VAJ away from being at best a 7-6 team last year.

This year hinges on North Dakota and Brady's fighting Hokes. They're set at RB and WR, the offensive line should be good, and they still have plenty of team speed. If their defense improves and Prokup becomes VAJ 2.0, they'll be a force in the conference. Otherwise, 7-6, 8-5 seems more reasonable.

I'll still trade you straight up a Carroll for a Riley. What do you say?

Helfraud sucks, but he's done more in the Pac-12 than Peterman has.

One year removed from Mariota, we lose more games in one season than we've had the previous 10 and give up the greatest comeback in bowl game history to a backup quarterback. Peterman has beaten Oklahoma in a bowl game, and also Chip. So, yes, I'll love to make that trade.

Helfrich was given the keys to a brand new Ferrari, and he proceeded to drive it for a couple years without changing the oil.

 

[TierbsHsotBoobs]

Speaking of dooging I watched the Alamo Bowl and despite the outcome Oregon is still way more talented than we? are

They have more talent than I think they're being given credit for, but they weren't exactly dominant against the Huskies last year. They were a VAJ, a Peterman, and a Babushka better. Way more talent is a stretch, and flat wrong when comparing defenses. Their defense last year sucked, ranked around 100th nationally. They got boat raced by Utah, lost to the Coogs at home and lost to TCU after running up a 31-0 lead. IMO, they were a VAJ away from being at best a 7-6 team last year.

This year hinges on North Dakota and Brady's fighting Hokes. They're set at RB and WR, the offensive line should be good, and they still have plenty of team speed. If their defense improves and Prokup becomes VAJ 2.0, they'll be a force in the conference. Otherwise, 7-6, 8-5 seems more reasonable.

I'll still trade you straight up a Carroll for a Riley. What do you say?

Helfraud sucks, but he's done more in the Pac-12 than Peterman has.

One year removed from Mariota, we lose more games in one season than we've had the previous 10 and give up the greatest comeback in bowl game history to a backup quarterback. Peterman has beaten Oklahoma in a bowl game, and also Chip. So, yes, I'll love to make that trade.

Helfrich was given the keys to a brand new Ferrari, and he proceeded to drive it for a couple years without changing the oil.

Peterman is worse than Sark was.

 

[greenblood]

Speaking of dooging I watched the Alamo Bowl and despite the outcome Oregon is still way more talented than we? are

They have more talent than I think they're being given credit for, but they weren't exactly dominant against the Huskies last year. They were a VAJ, a Peterman, and a Babushka better. Way more talent is a stretch, and flat wrong when comparing defenses. Their defense last year sucked, ranked around 100th nationally. They got boat raced by Utah, lost to the Coogs at home and lost to TCU after running up a 31-0 lead. IMO, they were a VAJ away from being at best a 7-6 team last year.

This year hinges on North Dakota and Brady's fighting Hokes. They're set at RB and WR, the offensive line should be good, and they still have plenty of team speed. If their defense improves and Prokup becomes VAJ 2.0, they'll be a force in the conference. Otherwise, 7-6, 8-5 seems more reasonable.

I'll still trade you straight up a Carroll for a Riley. What do you say?

Helfraud sucks, but he's done more in the Pac-12 than Peterman has.

One year removed from Mariota, we lose more games in one season than we've had the previous 10 and give up the greatest comeback in bowl game history to a backup quarterback. Peterman has beaten Oklahoma in a bowl game, and also Chip. So, yes, I'll love to make that trade.

Helfrich was given the keys to a brand new Ferrari, and he proceeded to drive it for a couple years without changing the oil.

Peterman is worse than Sark was.

Screen shot

 

[TierbsHsotBoobs]

Speaking of dooging I watched the Alamo Bowl and despite the outcome Oregon is still way more talented than we? are

They have more talent than I think they're being given credit for, but they weren't exactly dominant against the Huskies last year. They were a VAJ, a Peterman, and a Babushka better. Way more talent is a stretch, and flat wrong when comparing defenses. Their defense last year sucked, ranked around 100th nationally. They got boat raced by Utah, lost to the Coogs at home and lost to TCU after running up a 31-0 lead. IMO, they were a VAJ away from being at best a 7-6 team last year.

This year hinges on North Dakota and Brady's fighting Hokes. They're set at RB and WR, the offensive line should be good, and they still have plenty of team speed. If their defense improves and Prokup becomes VAJ 2.0, they'll be a force in the conference. Otherwise, 7-6, 8-5 seems more reasonable.

I'll still trade you straight up a Carroll for a Riley. What do you say?

Helfraud sucks, but he's done more in the Pac-12 than Peterman has.

One year removed from Mariota, we lose more games in one season than we've had the previous 10 and give up the greatest comeback in bowl game history to a backup quarterback. Peterman has beaten Oklahoma in a bowl game, and also Chip. So, yes, I'll love to make that trade.

Helfrich was given the keys to a brand new Ferrari, and he proceeded to drive it for a couple years without changing the oil.

Peterman is worse than Sark was.

Screen shot

8-10 is worse than 9-9.

Quooks hate facts.

 

[CFetters_Nacho_Lover]

The man who raged against people saying Chincredible, refers to Oregon as WhOregon.

Doogs gonna Doog.

 

[Pitchfork51]

I'll still trade you straight up a Helfrich for a Peterman. What do you say?

No one wins when you choose between Billy Bobs.

View attachment 9808

I always thought Peterman looks like guy pearce, but this is well done.

Edit: while searching for a picture to post I found out that he is banging Melisandre. That fucker.

 

[Kaepsknee]

State Penn????

 

[SpoonieLuv]

Speaking of dooging I watched the Alamo Bowl and despite the outcome Oregon is still way more talented than we? are

They have more talent than I think they're being given credit for, but they weren't exactly dominant against the Huskies last year. They were a VAJ, a Peterman, and a Babushka better. Way more talent is a stretch, and flat wrong when comparing defenses. Their defense last year sucked, ranked around 100th nationally. They got boat raced by Utah, lost to the Coogs at home and lost to TCU after running up a 31-0 lead. IMO, they were a VAJ away from being at best a 7-6 team last year.

This year hinges on North Dakota and Brady's fighting Hokes. They're set at RB and WR, the offensive line should be good, and they still have plenty of team speed. If their defense improves and Prokup becomes VAJ 2.0, they'll be a force in the conference. Otherwise, 7-6, 8-5 seems more reasonable.

I'll still trade you straight up a Carroll for a Riley. What do you say?

Helfraud sucks, but he's done more in the Pac-12 than Peterman has.

One year removed from Mariota, we lose more games in one season than we've had the previous 10 and give up the greatest comeback in bowl game history to a backup quarterback. Peterman has beaten Oklahoma in a bowl game, and also Chip. So, yes, I'll love to make that trade.

Helfrich was given the keys to a brand new Ferrari, and he proceeded to drive it for a couple years without changing the oil.

Peterman is worse than Sark was.

I think he's doing an OK! job