PM to Section14a

If Section14aFS were dropped on his head today, then cerebral function might return.

That is the dumbest mother fucker I've ever encountered on any sports message board I've read.
 
It's nice to see 14a finally getting the credit he deserves. His contributions to our present mess are very underrated.

FTGWARCG
 
Holy Fuck I just PM'd 14aFS with this:

The coaching continuity argument has been proven false time and time again.

Just look at Auburn and USC this year.

Coaches prove who they are pretty much after three years, sometimes four.

You need to keep firing and hiring coaches until you find the right guy.

Don't be part of the problem.


I then got this fucktarded response:

From:Section14a
Subject:RE: Stop
Sent:Today 12:08 PM PST
Delete Reply
But the coaching continuity argument has been proven true time and time again.

Pinkle at Missouri didn't win until his 7th season and Beamer at Va Tech the same and many were sugessting the hire Pinkel now. He wouldn't have lasted more than 4 years at Mizzou with your line of thinking. Do you think Mizzou fans are gratefull they had patience?

Constantly firing is seldom the solution. What top candidates would consider a job knowing the history of being canned if he doesn't win big within three seasons? Very few.

Don't be part of the mob mentality.

Here's my reply, this could get good:

Seriously? You choose Pinkel and Beamer as your examples? How many BCS appearances does Pinkel have? Beamer is the benefactor of a godawful ACC and he still lost 3-4 games per year in his prime.

Look at Alabama. Hired and fired until they got Saban. Florida hired and fired until they got Meyer. Michigan fired Rich Rod after 3 years and went to a Sugar Bowl the next. Auburn fired Tubberville and won the NC in year 2. Fired their NC winning coach last year and are now #7 in the country. USC hired and fired until they got Carroll. I can go on and on with examples of great coaches coming into a revolving door program and being great.

Coaches know they have a short leash in a BCS conference. UW can offer enough money to get the best candidates around.

Don't be part of the mentality that accepts mediocrity.
 
Holy Fuck I just PM'd 14aFS with this:

The coaching continuity argument has been proven false time and time again.

Just look at Auburn and USC this year.

Coaches prove who they are pretty much after three years, sometimes four.

You need to keep firing and hiring coaches until you find the right guy.

Don't be part of the problem.


I then got this fucktarded response:

From:Section14a
Subject:RE: Stop
Sent:Today 12:08 PM PST
Delete Reply
But the coaching continuity argument has been proven true time and time again.

Pinkle at Missouri didn't win until his 7th season and Beamer at Va Tech the same and many were sugessting the hire Pinkel now. He wouldn't have lasted more than 4 years at Mizzou with your line of thinking. Do you think Mizzou fans are gratefull they had patience?

Constantly firing is seldom the solution. What top candidates would consider a job knowing the history of being canned if he doesn't win big within three seasons? Very few.

Don't be part of the mob mentality.

Here's my reply, this could get good:

Seriously? You choose Pinkel and Beamer as your examples? How many BCS appearances does Pinkel have? Beamer is the benefactor of a godawful ACC and he still lost 3-4 games per year in his prime.

Look at Alabama. Hired and fired until they got Saban. Florida hired and fired until they got Meyer. Michigan fired Rich Rod after 3 years and went to a Sugar Bowl the next. Auburn fired Tubberville and won the NC in year 2. Fired their NC winning coach last year and are now #7 in the country. USC hired and fired until they got Carroll. I can go on and on with examples of great coaches coming into a revolving door program and being great.

Coaches know they have a short leash in a BCS conference. UW can offer enough money to get the best candidates around.

Don't be part of the mentality that accepts mediocrity.
Click to expand...

Tell him that Stanford had three coaches in six years before Harbaugh.

If he hates firing coaches, why didn't he demand more time for Gilby or Ty?
 
From:Section14a
Subject:RE: Stop
Sent:Today 12:39 PM PST
Delete Reply Next Message
Michigan? They are currently unranked and just barely beat a 4-6 Nothwestern team in 3 OTs yesterday so it is not like Brady Hoke is lighting that storied program on fire.

There are other examples but there is no use in getting into a pissing match.

Don't act like a Husky Half Brain...
 
My reply:

The half brains have been right for 11 years now. Maybe you should take a cue.

Btw Stanford had 3 coaches in 6 years and look at them now. Stanford...
 
From:Section14a
Subject:RE: Stop
Sent:Today 12:48 PM PST
Delete Reply Next Message

The Half Brains are often wrong too. You just don't acknowledge those times though.
 
From:Section14a
Subject:RE: Stop
Sent:Today 12:48 PM PST
Delete Reply Next Message

The Half Brains are often wrong too. You just don't acknowledge those times though.
Click to expand...

He's always there to point out when we are wrong but what about all the times we are right?
 
Me:

Enjoy keeping your head in the sand.

From:Section14a
Subject:RE: Stop
Sent:Today 1:04 PM PST
Delete Reply Next Message

Don't bother me with you links to that website. I have absolutely no interest in what they have to say.

From: Me
Sent: 11/17/2013Like what? Tedford?

Pretty spot on with Ty's 4th year, Sark, Mora, etc.

Required reading:http://hardcorehusky.com/news/duckfighter-illustrated
 
Oh the irony

From:Section14a
Subject:RE: Stop
Sent:Today 1:07 PM PST
Delete Reply Next Message
Enjoy being one of their lapdogs.
 
What's funny is that some of us weren't even on the HHB Horse (which was ultimately the right horse) that wanted Try gone after 3 seasons.

Is Husky Half Brain supposed to be an insult anyway? Those guys were right!
 
Pinkel had a proven track record and Missouri was terrible for 20+ years. In that situation, he deserved 5 years. Plus in his 3rd year he won 8 games. Other than 8 wins in 1998 that was the best season since 1981. And, I doubt Pinkel had top 25 classes like Sark.
 
Some people shouldn't be allowed to reproduce. Section14a has gotta be in the running for a Darwin Award annually.
 
Pinkel had a proven track record and Missouri was terrible for 20+ years. In that situation, he deserved 5 years. Plus in his 3rd year he won 8 games. Other than 8 wins in 1998 that was the best season since 1981. And, I doubt Pinkel had top 25 classes like Sark.
Click to expand...

Pinkel would have been fired before year 7, but Missouri isn't a football school.
 

Pinkel had a proven track record and Missouri was terrible for 20+ years. In that situation, he deserved 5 years. Plus in his 3rd year he won 8 games. Other than 8 wins in 1998 that was the best season since 1981. And, I doubt Pinkel had top 25 classes like Sark.
Click to expand...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top