PM to PLSS

ThomasFremont

New Fish
Got another warning from Stalin in my inbox.

Apparently I have been going too hard on poor little Sugar Steve, so he ran crying to Derek.

Again.

post-30371-I-suggest-you-stop-whining-lik-msaV.gif
 
Time to nut up Puppy. You remember the story of the little boy who cried wolf?

The moral of the story is never cry shitwolf - Officer Lahey

 
Got another warning from Stalin in my inbox.

Apparently I have been going too hard on poor little Sugar Steve, so he ran crying to Derek.

Again.

post-30371-I-suggest-you-stop-whining-lik-msaV.gif

So it's different if you whine to him "openly" in here about me?

Please take your own advice, POS.

Rottenecards_2715982_9pc7m9vghw.png


I'm talking to you, muther fucker.
 
Last edited:
Your honor, please mark this thread as exhibit 23,786 of d2d's complete lack of getting it.

Was this thread supposed to be funny, or was it about Tommy being a whining little bitch?

Please explain your logic?
 
Last edited:
Coming on strong, its like he thinks everyone forgot about him being a fake war hero and fake lawyer or something
 
Coming on strong, its like he thinks everyone forgot about him being a fake war hero and fake lawyer or something

Things Libtards do to Avoid Having an Honest Debate:

1. Ad Hominem (Name-Calling aka alleged fake war hero, alleged fake attorney; with no proof of the allegation.) BULLYING... BUL LYING. Interesting. Take out the BUL and you're just plain Lying.

ralphie-fighting-o.gif


2. Distracting (aka “Pivoting” aka “Changing the Subject”)

tumblr_m6cqg2TOkE1qzbagvo1_500.gif


"Sometimes, arguing with radicals seems like an exercise in futility. But remember, you’re not always arguing to change their minds, but the minds of rational people who are observing the debate, but are too timid to enter the discussion for fear of the Libtard attack tactics."


Derek doesn't like it when people hijack the thread, which you have done in this case. The subject is:

"Is Tommy a POS for bullying Puppy and then whining when Derek calls him out on it."

Tommy has not provided any evidence that Derek received a complaint from Puppy. He could have re-posted Derek's PM. Why didn't he? Instead, he just hung the allegation in the air with no supporting evidence. If he was an attorney, a judge would hand him his lunch for doing that. But what do I know? I'm just an alleged fake attorney, which you too provided no evidence.

A lot of that going around in here.
 
Last edited:
Got another warning from Stalin in my inbox.

Apparently I have been going too hard on poor little Sugar Steve, so he ran crying to Derek.

Again.

post-30371-I-suggest-you-stop-whining-lik-msaV.gif

So it's different if you whine to him "openly" in here about me?

Please take your own advice, POS.

Rottenecards_2715982_9pc7m9vghw.png


I'm talking to you, muther fucker.

Actually, if you read the thread about your shitposting and potential banning, I said crying to Derek about banning people was bullshit.

It's easier to keep the facts straight when you're not a compulsive liar.

Try it sometime.
 
Got another warning from Stalin in my inbox.

Apparently I have been going too hard on poor little Sugar Steve, so he ran crying to Derek.

Again.

post-30371-I-suggest-you-stop-whining-lik-msaV.gif

So it's different if you whine to him "openly" in here about me?

Please take your own advice, POS.

Rottenecards_2715982_9pc7m9vghw.png


I'm talking to you, muther fucker.

Actually, if you read the thread about your shitposting and potential banning, I said crying to Derek about banning people was bullshit.

It's easier to keep the facts straight when you're not a compulsive liar.

Try it sometime.

ninja-cat-fight-funny-wallpaper.jpg
 
Back
Top