PM to Kent Griswold

And BTW, it's very clear that "they" read the board over here based on some of the messages that I've received over the past couple of weeks (no shock to many here).

I find it amusing how important the relationship that they have with the AD is to them and how much they deny that it is. Hard to not believe that the AD doesn't play them like a yo-yo.
 
And BTW, it's very clear that "they" read the board over here based on some of the messages that I've received over the past couple of weeks (no shock to many here).

I find it amusing how important the relationship that they have with the AD is to them and how much they deny that it is. Hard to not believe that the AD doesn't play them like a yo-yo.
Click to expand...

Is your copy and paste function broken? Let's see the messages.
 
Some things remain private conversations for legitimate reasons. I'm too scared to post them as Kim might finally cut me off for good
Click to expand...

Fixed for accuracy.
 
These conversations are not directly tied to Kim ... they are tied to other people who I respect their privacy and candor for the comments that they've shared with me with the idea that these opinions have been made in private and not for public consumption.

I don't give a shit about pissing Kim Jong Vino off at this point ... I've already cancelled my membership and will have nothing to do with that website as long as he's involved in the direction of it.
 
These conversations are not directly tied to Kim ... they are tied to other people who I respect their privacy and candor for the comments that they've shared with me with the idea that these opinions have been made in private and not for public consumption.

I don't give a shit about pissing Kim Jong Vino off at this point ... I've already cancelled my membership and will have nothing to do with that website as long as he's involved in the direction of it.
Click to expand...

Good to see you are still loyal to Doogman. Nothing has changed.
 
These conversations are not directly tied to Kim ... they are tied to other people who I respect their privacy and candor for the comments that they've shared with me with the idea that these opinions have been made in private and not for public consumption.
Click to expand...

Maybe you are confused about the meaning of the word redact?
 
Pretty sure I know what redact means.

There's no reason for me to violate the trust I have with some people ... that doesn't mean I'm loyal to people like Kim Jong Vino.
 
Pretty sure I know what redact means.

There's no reason for me to violate the trust I have with some people ... that doesn't mean I'm loyal to people like Kim Jong Vino.
Click to expand...

Post the fucking messages and change the names then.

Or just post the messages from the assholes. Not hard.
 
Why do you give a shit?

I can post the same messages in a paraphrased form that doesn't violate any trust, etc. and it's virtually the same as redacting.

Your need for a fucking screen shot or some kind of proof is truly FS behavior.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top