PM to Kent Griswold

Tequilla

Tequilla

Active poster
I Find It Rather Amusing ...

That you "moderate" posts from "trouble makers" who post in a respectful manner and don't make personal attacks but instead allow posters and staff to continuously make personal attacks on people that are considered "bad for business" in an attempt to "cleanse" the board. More than a little hypocritical ... don't you think?

Good news is that as you and your crew keep up this behavior you'll manage to cleanse out all individuals that actually can think for themselves and instead what will remain is a group that can't tell which way is up or down. Is it any coincidence that as you look up and down the topics being posted nobody has anything to add? What remains is a relatively uneducated message board that doesn't talk about anything of importance and instead asks such mind blowing questions such as whether anybody passes the "look test."

So congrats on that, and for allowing me an easy decision to save $120 per year and apply that towards playing golf, and the free time of mine that you've allowed me to devote to other interests.

More good news for you though is that subscribers are at an all time high (per your words ... would hate to twist on such an important topic) and most of them are either too dumb or too new to realize that what used to be a community designed to talk about all things good and bad about Husky Sports has turned into a mouthpiece for whatever the status quo and/or agenda is either from the staff and/or AD at any given point in time.

I commend you and your staff for showing your true colors in trying to paint me as this outcast that has half a brain. It's comical to watch. But it's also rather funny as there are a large number of people that know me to be far different than the person that you and your staff has tried to paint and I've heard as much from many of them.

Sad that you and your crew had to stoop to these kinds of levels "to win" against those that talk with logic, reason, and an interest that is solely tied to the success of the University of Washington.

Enjoy what you've built ... it's basically everything you used to bitch and moan about not being years ago.
 
Why the fuck do you still post there? What's the point in saying good bye if you continue to post there.

The worst kind of Doogs are those who know Kim is bad yet continue to give him money.
 
How badly did Kim hurt you, Tequilla? I'm all for bashing Kim, but that you continue to vent about all of this like it is something new is baffling.
 
Jesus man did Kim spurn you when you tried to get a bj from him? You've written 5,000 words on this fucking topic in the last week alone.

Great fucking read as always, moron.
 
Just calling out the BS ...

Pretty sure my "membership" has expired there, or if not, will be in the next day or two ...

Last I checked, it's America and you are guaranteed the right to free speech. I find it beyond amusing to think that a fucking midget thinks that a prudent business model includes censorship.
 
Just calling out the BS ...

Pretty sure my "membership" has expired there, or if not, will be in the next day or two ...

Last I checked, it's America and you are guaranteed the right to free speech. I find it beyond amusing to think that a fucking midget thinks that a prudent business model includes censorship.
Click to expand...

Kim on free speech ..."this ain't america this is dawgman" direct quote from the little hitler
 
Jesus man did Kim spurn you when you tried to get a bj from him? You've written 5,000 words on this fucking topic in the last week alone.

Great fucking read as always, moron.
Click to expand...

5000 words from Tequilla is the abridged version.
 


You're acting like this is all new Tequila. That reptile has been making his own rules, manipulating, lying, and stifling legitimate discussion for a while.
 
Ha I so thought this was the fake Tequila and Auburndoog for a while. Turns out I was wrong on both sides. Tequila came through and aubby ran back to doogman.
 
aubby ran back to doogman.
Click to expand...

Ha ha! What.a.fag ($75K)

That bitch couldn't take the feedback from his power-doog rankings. I'm sure he was welcomed back with open arms by the rest of those bitches
 
Ha I so thought this was the fake Tequila and Auburndoog for a while. Turns out I was wrong on both sides. Tequila came through and aubby ran back to doogman.
Click to expand...

Same. I thought both of them were whoosh accounts.

 
That would be a strong whoosh attempt by me if I kept that charade up for months
Click to expand...
Agree. But I thought maybe it was a guy in his mom's basement with a boner in his sweatpants keeping it going.

Seriously though, anyone who didn't think they were being whooshed when "Tequila" suddenly showed up is fucking lying.

 
That would be a strong whoosh attempt by me if I kept that charade up for months
Click to expand...

I thought it when you first joined. Regarding Kim, you can't try and be logical with the guy. You should have realized that by now. The first timeout I ever got was for saying LSU was merely a very good team in 2012, that it was a pathetic showing by UW, and that something was obviously wrong. I said that in year 4, Sark should not be getting blown out 41-3 in a game that could have been 62-3 if Les Miles chose to go for some 4th and 1's and didn't let off early.

Kim and Fetters were basically pooh poohing the plunger raping because they had a great time in New Orleans hanging with their buddy John Anderson. Besides, John Anderson thinks Sark is doing a great job, and he's a former player so I should listen to what he says. I told them I didn't give a shit if they had the best time of their life or what John Anderson thought. It was a dreadful performance and it was time to logically consider firing Sark, if you hadn't already thought about it. That's it. No personal attacks, I didn't beat a dead horse, I only told Fetters and Kim that they were wrong. To anyone with a clue, what I said made perfect sense. Who the fuck can excuse losing 41-3 in year 4 to anyone, let alone a 3 loss LSU team who would squeak out some wins against SEC bottom dwellers.

I haven't followed the recent developments between you and Kim, but I saw when Eklund said you hate Sark and talked about the company you keep. You didn't toe the line Tequilla, and at doogman, unless you agree with everything Kim wants, or have no thoughts or opinions other than "Go Dawgs", you are going to run into trouble. If you post on this site and frequently disagree with the lemon party trio, you aren't going to last on doogman for very long.

Quit doogman and stop sweating over it. I'm sure someone can supply you with an account to read from when something really fucktarded happens over there. This isn't as big of a community, but the football talk that goes on here is with people who have a clue. And despite what some morons think, there is football talk here, especially during the season. Even when I am arguing with other posters here, I don't think they are idiots like I did engaging with posters at doogman. And the best part is, when someone does make terrible points regarding football, you can go as hard as you want at them without getting a time out or banned.

 
That would be a strong whoosh attempt by me if I kept that charade up for months
Click to expand...

I thought it when you first joined. Regarding Kim, you can't try and be logical with the guy. You should have realized that by now. The first timeout I ever got was for saying LSU was merely a very good team in 2012, that it was a pathetic showing by UW, and that something was obviously wrong. I said that in year 4, Sark should not be getting blown out 41-3 in a game that could have been 62-3 if Les Miles chose to go for some 4th and 1's and didn't let off early.
Click to expand...
Holy fuck that brings back memories. It started with the first Nebraska plungering. Kim and Ektard said it was fine because Nebraska is just that good and will probably win the natty. Then they lose 4 games. Same thing with LSU. THey said "LSU would have beaten anybody by 40 points." Turns out LSU was not a great team that year. That's when I about had it and I believe it's when I got my first of many timeouts. I also think that's when kirkjonesdoog said he hates the board after a loss so he won't go on for 48 hours. I hate that guy.
 
For the record, I quit doogman about 3 weeks ago now, but the account doesn't run out til the end of the month. Perhaps Tequilla has the same issue and that is why he is still over there.

Plus it is fun to watch train wrecks, and that is what doogman is right now.
 
For the record, I quit doogman about 3 weeks ago now, but the account doesn't run out til the end of the month. Perhaps Tequilla has the same issue and that is why he is still over there.

Plus it is fun to watch train wrecks, and that is what doogman is right now.
Click to expand...

I think the official date of my expiration is March 12th.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top