Pup saw Haeners game as frosh. Why Pup thought he should have started over Eason, at least played so he didn't transfer. Petersen has always been genius recruiting qbs...aside from Browning has never failed at qb
Aside from the guy he started for four out of his six years, he never failed? Your syphilis is out of control.
I'm starting to think everybody here is the type to marry a stripper, end up penniless and riddled with herpies after the divorce, then walk up to the next stripper they see and ask, "Hey, how you doin'?..."
The level of disdain for Browning here is crazy to me considering that Hardcore Husky got EVERYTHING it wanted right after he graduated (big dick gunslinger 5* quarterback, magical 4-star ratio, highly recruited receivers galore, etc.), and it went to shit. The quarterback with the most wins in conference history is a failure in hindsight because of a variety of superficial reasons (small dick, carefully aims gun before shooting) and never winning the big game. Maybe I'm preconditioned to have a soft spot for the fucker because a sentient cumquat would have been an upgrade from Cyley Mirus, but the benefit of hindsight also has me preferring tediously, methodically, painstakingly going 10-3 and losing a NY6 than big-dick/four-starring the way to 4-5 in conference.
In short, I'll take a Trevor Lawrence if UW and its boosters are willing to spend a million to get one, but since that's not happening, I'd rather have somebody who's incredibly accurate from 25 yards in to somebody who can throw 70 yards but not hit the broadside of a barn or throw with any kind of touch. After Browning's shoulder got harmburgered, starting him effectively put a lid on the offense. I get that. But--even after that--he still managed to win a shitload of games, painful as they were to watch. The guy everyone hates the most is only the second actual winner[/i] we?'ve had at QB since 1992. Was no Trevor Lawrence, but he was a good college quarterback.
