PM to @HHusky fs

[doogie]

Approved for use = used to treat, right critical thinker?

Did you actually read it?

It's not a study.

Ask me how I know you didn't read it.

Bump. @HHusky

I don't care how you "know" something untrue.

Btw:

View attachment 43333

Peru approved Ivermectin use in early May 2020.

 

[RaceBannon]

Did you actually read it?

It's not a study.

Ask me how I know you didn't read it.

Bump. @HHusky

I don't care how you "know" something untrue.

Btw:

View attachment 43333

Peru approved Ivermectin use in early May 2020.

Nobody mentioned Peru

 

[RaceBannon]

Peru has bad cell service

 

[Sources]

Peru has bad cell service

Where do you think all that COVID is coming from?

 

[doogie]

Science says: Boosters not needed!
https://twitter.com/TheLancet/status/1437402964919001088?s=20

 

[RaceBannon]

Peru is over 30 percent vaxxed

H owned himself again

 

[hardhat]

Deaths and Hospitalizations 'with' or 'for' COVID? That is the question.

 

[TurdBomber]

Did you actually read it?

It's not a study.

Six of seven meta-analyses[/b] of IVM treatment RCTs reporting in 2021 found notable reductions in COVID-19 fatalities, with a mean 31% relative risk of mortality vs. controls. During mass IVM treatments in Peru, excess deaths fell by a mean of 74% over 30 days in its ten states with the most extensive treatments. Reductions in deaths correlated with the extent of IVM distributions in all 25 states with p < 0.002. Sharp reductions in morbidity using IVM were also observed in two animal models, of SARS-CoV-2 and a related betacoronavirus. The indicated biological mechanism of IVM, competitive binding with SARS-CoV-2 spike protein, is likely non-epitope specific, possibly yielding full efficacy against emerging viral mutant strains.

Will you ever not be a dumb faggot and shitty lawyer, Dazzler? Rhetorical Question.

 

[HHusky]

Did you actually read it?

It's not a study.

Six of seven meta-analyses[/b] of IVM treatment RCTs reporting in 2021 found notable reductions in COVID-19 fatalities, with a mean 31% relative risk of mortality vs. controls. During mass IVM treatments in Peru, excess deaths fell by a mean of 74% over 30 days in its ten states with the most extensive treatments. Reductions in deaths correlated with the extent of IVM distributions in all 25 states with p < 0.002. Sharp reductions in morbidity using IVM were also observed in two animal models, of SARS-CoV-2 and a related betacoronavirus. The indicated biological mechanism of IVM, competitive binding with SARS-CoV-2 spike protein, is likely non-epitope specific, possibly yielding full efficacy against emerging viral mutant strains.

Will you ever not be a dumb faggot and shitty lawyer, Dazzler? Rhetorical Question.

Faggot seems harsh.

 

[Kaepsknee]

We’re? still pumpin the horse pills eh?

 

[TurdBomber]

We’re? still pumpin the horse pills eh?

There's no such thing, Moron.

 

[pawz]

Did you actually read it?

It's not a study.

@HHusky @Kaepsknee

119 studies. Evidence. No horse pills.
https://c19ivermectin.com/

 

[RaceBannon]

Maybe @Kaepsknee can help H out on why unvaccinated Africa and their "horse pills" have the least cases and deaths

View attachment 5804

 

[Kaepsknee]

Well that settles it then. In a abundance of caution, I’ll be stocking up on some Ho…, oops, uh Ivermectin just in case there’s a breakthrough.

 

[RaceBannon]

Well that settles it then. In a abundance of caution, I’ll be stocking up on some Ho…, oops, uh Ivermectin just in case there’s a breakthrough.

Feel free to take a stab at it. H could use the help

 

[Kaepsknee]

Maybe @Kaepsknee can help H out on why unvaccinated Africa and their "horse pills" have the least cases and deaths

View attachment 5804

Linq?