PM to all Oregon fans

[oregonblitzkrieg]

Congrats on fucking up another sure thing. You let a half retarded QB lead another mediocre comeback against your miserable SQWAD of flexing dipshits. The Pac-12 still sucks because of you dumbfucks. Thanks for nothing.

They may have just kept us out of the playoff. This could be the quook master plan.

Go undefeated and we are in. 11-1 and we are likely in.

Beat everyone, nothing else matters

undefeated - in

11-1 - out

Not likely. 11-1 probably gets us in, just depends on what happens around us.

But despite shit non conference schedules and all the "ESPN hates us" inferiority complex we have recently been both the lowest playoff team in and the lowest New Year's Six team in.

Smart money is on a one loss UW team to make the playoff, though it's certainly not a sure thing.

We were the clear #3 team and got seeded 4th in the playoff in 2016. Making it to a NY6 isn't really anyone's concern. We can easily do that at 11-1.

Of course we get into an NY6 at 11-1, that wasn't my point. My point is we have gotten *in* when conventional wisdom had us *out* with the playoff and sort of with the NY6 (plenty of people here thought we'd get screwed out of a spot).

If we go 11-1 we'll most likely be in the playoff.

I disagree we were the clear #3 in 2016 heading into the playoff, BTW.

The chances that Alabama, Clemson, Georgia, and Ohio state will lose more than one game is low.

Throw in Oklahoma, LSU, Michigan, and Norte dame possibly going 11-1 or better...

UW will have to go undefeated to make the playoffs this year because the perception of the pac12 is that bad.

It’s college football though so maybe we go 10-3 and it’s a mute point anyways

I swear this shit gets said every year. Yet not once has their been a CFP where a 1-loss Pac team would conceivably be left out of the playoff. In years where the scenario was possible, we got a bid. In years where it wasn't ('17 and '18), the field sorted itself out in a way where if there was a 1-loss Pac team they would've certainly gotten in.

One loss Ohio State was left out last year... erase all but one of our regular season losses last year and I still do not see us getting in.

If we beat Auburn and only lose to Cal or Oregon, I think we get in. Remember, OSU ultimately lost out because of an absolute drubbing by a mediocre Purdue squad. In this scenario we have a better OOC win and no embarrassing loss on the resume. I'd wager that that would've been enough to tip the scales in our favor despite the conference being weaker than the Big Ten.

The only bowl game Pete's won at UW is the Heart of Dallas Bowl. You should probably try to work your way up to the Alamo bowl and win that before setting your sights on a playoff game and getting curbstomped by Clemson or Alabama.

 

[PostGameOrangeSlices]

Congrats on fucking up another sure thing. You let a half retarded QB lead another mediocre comeback against your miserable SQWAD of flexing dipshits. The Pac-12 still sucks because of you dumbfucks. Thanks for nothing.

They may have just kept us out of the playoff. This could be the quook master plan.

Go undefeated and we are in. 11-1 and we are likely in.

Beat everyone, nothing else matters

undefeated - in

11-1 - out

Not likely. 11-1 probably gets us in, just depends on what happens around us.

But despite shit non conference schedules and all the "ESPN hates us" inferiority complex we have recently been both the lowest playoff team in and the lowest New Year's Six team in.

Smart money is on a one loss UW team to make the playoff, though it's certainly not a sure thing.

We were the clear #3 team and got seeded 4th in the playoff in 2016. Making it to a NY6 isn't really anyone's concern. We can easily do that at 11-1.

Of course we get into an NY6 at 11-1, that wasn't my point. My point is we have gotten *in* when conventional wisdom had us *out* with the playoff and sort of with the NY6 (plenty of people here thought we'd get screwed out of a spot).

If we go 11-1 we'll most likely be in the playoff.

I disagree we were the clear #3 in 2016 heading into the playoff, BTW.

The chances that Alabama, Clemson, Georgia, and Ohio state will lose more than one game is low.

Throw in Oklahoma, LSU, Michigan, and Norte dame possibly going 11-1 or better...

UW will have to go undefeated to make the playoffs this year because the perception of the pac12 is that bad.

It’s college football though so maybe we go 10-3 and it’s a mute point anyways

I swear this shit gets said every year. Yet not once has their been a CFP where a 1-loss Pac team would conceivably be left out of the playoff. In years where the scenario was possible, we got a bid. In years where it wasn't ('17 and '18), the field sorted itself out in a way where if there was a 1-loss Pac team they would've certainly gotten in.

One loss Ohio State was left out last year... erase all but one of our regular season losses last year and I still do not see us getting in.

If we beat Auburn and only lose to Cal or Oregon, I think we get in. Remember, OSU ultimately lost out because of an absolute drubbing by a mediocre Purdue squad. In this scenario we have a better OOC win and no embarrassing loss on the resume. I'd wager that that would've been enough to tip the scales in our favor despite the conference being weaker than the Big Ten.

The only bowl game Pete's won at UW is the Heart of Dallas Bowl. You should probably try to work your way up to the Alamo bowl and win that before setting your sights on a playoff game and getting curbstomped by Clemson or Alabama.

I like how you ignore how UW finished #4 and gave Alabama a game for 3 quarters in the semi-finals. Fucking retard.

Winning the Alamo Bowl is for fucking Coogs.

 

[USMChawk]

I do enjoy all the 12-0 and all the "if we go 11-1.....) talk, right before you lose to both USC and Arizona.

Obk has a sad case of the "oh yeah well at least you, you,you guys are just dreaming about having a great season but you won't, you won't just because I said because my team choked on a tampon at the last moment. So there take that."

Dude your faggoty team was super overrated and you lost because A. Your team is twash[/b] and they like to think more about what they are going to wear than how they will play.
B. Instead of conditioning they take mustache rides with that circus ring leader looking motherfucker.

Wait until the Dawgs lose and then pop off. Don't even wait until you beat a good to team because that will be a long while.

By the way your handle sounds like a sex move. The coldest ever sex move the most ironic sex move. It's what incels call it when they jerk it. "Man last night after the Oregon ducks loss I just Oregon Blitz krieged it all night to take my mind off the game.

FTFY

 

[Mad_Son]

Congrats on fucking up another sure thing. You let a half retarded QB lead another mediocre comeback against your miserable SQWAD of flexing dipshits. The Pac-12 still sucks because of you dumbfucks. Thanks for nothing.

They may have just kept us out of the playoff. This could be the quook master plan.

Go undefeated and we are in. 11-1 and we are likely in.

Beat everyone, nothing else matters

undefeated - in

11-1 - out

Not likely. 11-1 probably gets us in, just depends on what happens around us.

But despite shit non conference schedules and all the "ESPN hates us" inferiority complex we have recently been both the lowest playoff team in and the lowest New Year's Six team in.

Smart money is on a one loss UW team to make the playoff, though it's certainly not a sure thing.

We were the clear #3 team and got seeded 4th in the playoff in 2016. Making it to a NY6 isn't really anyone's concern. We can easily do that at 11-1.

Of course we get into an NY6 at 11-1, that wasn't my point. My point is we have gotten *in* when conventional wisdom had us *out* with the playoff and sort of with the NY6 (plenty of people here thought we'd get screwed out of a spot).

If we go 11-1 we'll most likely be in the playoff.

I disagree we were the clear #3 in 2016 heading into the playoff, BTW.

The chances that Alabama, Clemson, Georgia, and Ohio state will lose more than one game is low.

Throw in Oklahoma, LSU, Michigan, and Norte dame possibly going 11-1 or better...

UW will have to go undefeated to make the playoffs this year because the perception of the pac12 is that bad.

It’s college football though so maybe we go 10-3 and it’s a mute point anyways

I swear this shit gets said every year. Yet not once has their been a CFP where a 1-loss Pac team would conceivably be left out of the playoff. In years where the scenario was possible, we got a bid. In years where it wasn't ('17 and '18), the field sorted itself out in a way where if there was a 1-loss Pac team they would've certainly gotten in.

One loss Ohio State was left out last year... erase all but one of our regular season losses last year and I still do not see us getting in.

If we beat Auburn and only lose to Cal or Oregon, I think we get in. Remember, OSU ultimately lost out because of an absolute drubbing by a mediocre Purdue squad. In this scenario we have a better OOC win and no embarrassing loss on the resume. I'd wager that that would've been enough to tip the scales in our favor despite the conference being weaker than the Big Ten.

As a quick objective comparison of mid-rank teams last year, Sagarin had Purdue at 47 vs Cal at 59. Either we have a lower quality win or a worse loss there. I don't think that we have a compelling better resume, just a comparable resume.

"When circumstances at the margins indicate that teams are comparable, then the following criteria must be considered:

Championships won
Strength of schedule
Head‐to‐head competition (if it occurred)
Comparative outcomes of common opponents (without incenting margin of victory)"

We both won a championship so the next thing is strength of schedule. That is where the conference beauty pageant is so important.

Also, if we beat Ohio State for that spot, we then have to beat 12-1 Oklahoma, using the same criteria.

I still feel pretty confident that conference perception is important for CFP selection given the committee has to try and gauge strength of schedule.

 

[GreenRiverGatorz]

Congrats on fucking up another sure thing. You let a half retarded QB lead another mediocre comeback against your miserable SQWAD of flexing dipshits. The Pac-12 still sucks because of you dumbfucks. Thanks for nothing.

They may have just kept us out of the playoff. This could be the quook master plan.

Go undefeated and we are in. 11-1 and we are likely in.

Beat everyone, nothing else matters

undefeated - in

11-1 - out

Not likely. 11-1 probably gets us in, just depends on what happens around us.

But despite shit non conference schedules and all the "ESPN hates us" inferiority complex we have recently been both the lowest playoff team in and the lowest New Year's Six team in.

Smart money is on a one loss UW team to make the playoff, though it's certainly not a sure thing.

We were the clear #3 team and got seeded 4th in the playoff in 2016. Making it to a NY6 isn't really anyone's concern. We can easily do that at 11-1.

Of course we get into an NY6 at 11-1, that wasn't my point. My point is we have gotten *in* when conventional wisdom had us *out* with the playoff and sort of with the NY6 (plenty of people here thought we'd get screwed out of a spot).

If we go 11-1 we'll most likely be in the playoff.

I disagree we were the clear #3 in 2016 heading into the playoff, BTW.

The chances that Alabama, Clemson, Georgia, and Ohio state will lose more than one game is low.

Throw in Oklahoma, LSU, Michigan, and Norte dame possibly going 11-1 or better...

UW will have to go undefeated to make the playoffs this year because the perception of the pac12 is that bad.

It’s college football though so maybe we go 10-3 and it’s a mute point anyways

I swear this shit gets said every year. Yet not once has their been a CFP where a 1-loss Pac team would conceivably be left out of the playoff. In years where the scenario was possible, we got a bid. In years where it wasn't ('17 and '18), the field sorted itself out in a way where if there was a 1-loss Pac team they would've certainly gotten in.

One loss Ohio State was left out last year... erase all but one of our regular season losses last year and I still do not see us getting in.

If we beat Auburn and only lose to Cal or Oregon, I think we get in. Remember, OSU ultimately lost out because of an absolute drubbing by a mediocre Purdue squad. In this scenario we have a better OOC win and no embarrassing loss on the resume. I'd wager that that would've been enough to tip the scales in our favor despite the conference being weaker than the Big Ten.

As a quick objective comparison of mid-rank teams last year, Sagarin had Purdue at 47 vs Cal at 59. Either we have a lower quality win or a worse loss there. I don't think that we have a compelling better resume, just a comparable resume.

"When circumstances at the margins indicate that teams are comparable, then the following criteria must be considered:

Championships won
Strength of schedule
Head‐to‐head competition (if it occurred)
Comparative outcomes of common opponents (without incenting margin of victory)"

We both won a championship so the next thing is strength of schedule. That is where the conference beauty pageant is so important.

Also, if we beat Ohio State for that spot, we then have to beat 12-1 Oklahoma, using the same criteria.

I still feel pretty confident that conference perception is important for CFP selection given the committee has to try and gauge strength of schedule.

I think you're still underestimating the stain of that Purdue loss on OSU's resume. Narrowly losing to Cal is far superior to getting dick smashed by 29 points by Purdue.

 

[oregonblitzkrieg]

Congrats on fucking up another sure thing. You let a half retarded QB lead another mediocre comeback against your miserable SQWAD of flexing dipshits. The Pac-12 still sucks because of you dumbfucks. Thanks for nothing.

They may have just kept us out of the playoff. This could be the quook master plan.

Go undefeated and we are in. 11-1 and we are likely in.

Beat everyone, nothing else matters

undefeated - in

11-1 - out

Not likely. 11-1 probably gets us in, just depends on what happens around us.

But despite shit non conference schedules and all the "ESPN hates us" inferiority complex we have recently been both the lowest playoff team in and the lowest New Year's Six team in.

Smart money is on a one loss UW team to make the playoff, though it's certainly not a sure thing.

We were the clear #3 team and got seeded 4th in the playoff in 2016. Making it to a NY6 isn't really anyone's concern. We can easily do that at 11-1.

Of course we get into an NY6 at 11-1, that wasn't my point. My point is we have gotten *in* when conventional wisdom had us *out* with the playoff and sort of with the NY6 (plenty of people here thought we'd get screwed out of a spot).

If we go 11-1 we'll most likely be in the playoff.

I disagree we were the clear #3 in 2016 heading into the playoff, BTW.

The chances that Alabama, Clemson, Georgia, and Ohio state will lose more than one game is low.

Throw in Oklahoma, LSU, Michigan, and Norte dame possibly going 11-1 or better...

UW will have to go undefeated to make the playoffs this year because the perception of the pac12 is that bad.

It’s college football though so maybe we go 10-3 and it’s a mute point anyways

I swear this shit gets said every year. Yet not once has their been a CFP where a 1-loss Pac team would conceivably be left out of the playoff. In years where the scenario was possible, we got a bid. In years where it wasn't ('17 and '18), the field sorted itself out in a way where if there was a 1-loss Pac team they would've certainly gotten in.

One loss Ohio State was left out last year... erase all but one of our regular season losses last year and I still do not see us getting in.

If we beat Auburn and only lose to Cal or Oregon, I think we get in. Remember, OSU ultimately lost out because of an absolute drubbing by a mediocre Purdue squad. In this scenario we have a better OOC win and no embarrassing loss on the resume. I'd wager that that would've been enough to tip the scales in our favor despite the conference being weaker than the Big Ten.

The only bowl game Pete's won at UW is the Heart of Dallas Bowl. You should probably try to work your way up to the Alamo bowl and win that before setting your sights on a playoff game and getting curbstomped by Clemson or Alabama.

I like how you ignore how UW finished #4 and gave Alabama a game for 3 quarters in the semi-finals. Fucking retard.

Winning the Alamo Bowl is for fucking Coogs.

Alabama was in control of that game and Jalen Hurts was the QB. Win a playoff game then pop off.

 

[HuskyJW]

Not looking forward to this in 2020....
https://twitter.com/Scoop03/status/1145718441095000064

They had a parade for losing. People forget this.

 

[Mad_Son]

Congrats on fucking up another sure thing. You let a half retarded QB lead another mediocre comeback against your miserable SQWAD of flexing dipshits. The Pac-12 still sucks because of you dumbfucks. Thanks for nothing.

They may have just kept us out of the playoff. This could be the quook master plan.

Go undefeated and we are in. 11-1 and we are likely in.

Beat everyone, nothing else matters

undefeated - in

11-1 - out

Not likely. 11-1 probably gets us in, just depends on what happens around us.

But despite shit non conference schedules and all the "ESPN hates us" inferiority complex we have recently been both the lowest playoff team in and the lowest New Year's Six team in.

Smart money is on a one loss UW team to make the playoff, though it's certainly not a sure thing.

We were the clear #3 team and got seeded 4th in the playoff in 2016. Making it to a NY6 isn't really anyone's concern. We can easily do that at 11-1.

Of course we get into an NY6 at 11-1, that wasn't my point. My point is we have gotten *in* when conventional wisdom had us *out* with the playoff and sort of with the NY6 (plenty of people here thought we'd get screwed out of a spot).

If we go 11-1 we'll most likely be in the playoff.

I disagree we were the clear #3 in 2016 heading into the playoff, BTW.

The chances that Alabama, Clemson, Georgia, and Ohio state will lose more than one game is low.

Throw in Oklahoma, LSU, Michigan, and Norte dame possibly going 11-1 or better...

UW will have to go undefeated to make the playoffs this year because the perception of the pac12 is that bad.

It’s college football though so maybe we go 10-3 and it’s a mute point anyways

I swear this shit gets said every year. Yet not once has their been a CFP where a 1-loss Pac team would conceivably be left out of the playoff. In years where the scenario was possible, we got a bid. In years where it wasn't ('17 and '18), the field sorted itself out in a way where if there was a 1-loss Pac team they would've certainly gotten in.

One loss Ohio State was left out last year... erase all but one of our regular season losses last year and I still do not see us getting in.

If we beat Auburn and only lose to Cal or Oregon, I think we get in. Remember, OSU ultimately lost out because of an absolute drubbing by a mediocre Purdue squad. In this scenario we have a better OOC win and no embarrassing loss on the resume. I'd wager that that would've been enough to tip the scales in our favor despite the conference being weaker than the Big Ten.

As a quick objective comparison of mid-rank teams last year, Sagarin had Purdue at 47 vs Cal at 59. Either we have a lower quality win or a worse loss there. I don't think that we have a compelling better resume, just a comparable resume.

"When circumstances at the margins indicate that teams are comparable, then the following criteria must be considered:

Championships won
Strength of schedule
Head‐to‐head competition (if it occurred)
Comparative outcomes of common opponents (without incenting margin of victory)"

We both won a championship so the next thing is strength of schedule. That is where the conference beauty pageant is so important.

Also, if we beat Ohio State for that spot, we then have to beat 12-1 Oklahoma, using the same criteria.

I still feel pretty confident that conference perception is important for CFP selection given the committee has to try and gauge strength of schedule.

I think you're still underestimating the stain of that Purdue loss on OSU's resume. Narrowly losing to Cal is far superior to getting dick smashed by 29 points by Purdue.

Since we just comped ourselves two wins to even get in the conversation, let's give ohio state 28 points, if that focuses this for you. Or maybe say we get past ohio state and have to also displace one loss oklahoma.

Like we've already seen one loss teams displaced - your argument reminds me of the BCS apologists trying to rationalize the system saying it is close enough as new scenarios continually emerge that show it isn't close enough.

Strength of schedule is a component in choosing playoff teams. The national narrative is that the Pac-12 is a weak conference and that the teams here aren't as good as other teams. When our schedule is compared to others as these folks make subjective decisions that is a problem for us.

I don't get why people think this is controversial.

 

[GreenRiverGatorz]

Congrats on fucking up another sure thing. You let a half retarded QB lead another mediocre comeback against your miserable SQWAD of flexing dipshits. The Pac-12 still sucks because of you dumbfucks. Thanks for nothing.

They may have just kept us out of the playoff. This could be the quook master plan.

Go undefeated and we are in. 11-1 and we are likely in.

Beat everyone, nothing else matters

undefeated - in

11-1 - out

Not likely. 11-1 probably gets us in, just depends on what happens around us.

But despite shit non conference schedules and all the "ESPN hates us" inferiority complex we have recently been both the lowest playoff team in and the lowest New Year's Six team in.

Smart money is on a one loss UW team to make the playoff, though it's certainly not a sure thing.

We were the clear #3 team and got seeded 4th in the playoff in 2016. Making it to a NY6 isn't really anyone's concern. We can easily do that at 11-1.

Of course we get into an NY6 at 11-1, that wasn't my point. My point is we have gotten *in* when conventional wisdom had us *out* with the playoff and sort of with the NY6 (plenty of people here thought we'd get screwed out of a spot).

If we go 11-1 we'll most likely be in the playoff.

I disagree we were the clear #3 in 2016 heading into the playoff, BTW.

The chances that Alabama, Clemson, Georgia, and Ohio state will lose more than one game is low.

Throw in Oklahoma, LSU, Michigan, and Norte dame possibly going 11-1 or better...

UW will have to go undefeated to make the playoffs this year because the perception of the pac12 is that bad.

It’s college football though so maybe we go 10-3 and it’s a mute point anyways

I swear this shit gets said every year. Yet not once has their been a CFP where a 1-loss Pac team would conceivably be left out of the playoff. In years where the scenario was possible, we got a bid. In years where it wasn't ('17 and '18), the field sorted itself out in a way where if there was a 1-loss Pac team they would've certainly gotten in.

One loss Ohio State was left out last year... erase all but one of our regular season losses last year and I still do not see us getting in.

If we beat Auburn and only lose to Cal or Oregon, I think we get in. Remember, OSU ultimately lost out because of an absolute drubbing by a mediocre Purdue squad. In this scenario we have a better OOC win and no embarrassing loss on the resume. I'd wager that that would've been enough to tip the scales in our favor despite the conference being weaker than the Big Ten.

As a quick objective comparison of mid-rank teams last year, Sagarin had Purdue at 47 vs Cal at 59. Either we have a lower quality win or a worse loss there. I don't think that we have a compelling better resume, just a comparable resume.

"When circumstances at the margins indicate that teams are comparable, then the following criteria must be considered:

Championships won
Strength of schedule
Head‐to‐head competition (if it occurred)
Comparative outcomes of common opponents (without incenting margin of victory)"

We both won a championship so the next thing is strength of schedule. That is where the conference beauty pageant is so important.

Also, if we beat Ohio State for that spot, we then have to beat 12-1 Oklahoma, using the same criteria.

I still feel pretty confident that conference perception is important for CFP selection given the committee has to try and gauge strength of schedule.

I think you're still underestimating the stain of that Purdue loss on OSU's resume. Narrowly losing to Cal is far superior to getting dick smashed by 29 points by Purdue.

Since we just comped ourselves two wins to even get in the conversation, let's give ohio state 28 points, if that focuses this for you. Or maybe say we get past ohio state and have to also displace one loss oklahoma.

Like we've already seen one loss teams displaced - your argument reminds me of the BCS apologists trying to rationalize the system saying it is close enough as new scenarios continually emerge that show it isn't close enough.

Strength of schedule is a component in choosing playoff teams. The national narrative is that the Pac-12 is a weak conference and that the teams here aren't as good as other teams. When our schedule is compared to others as these folks make subjective decisions that is a problem for us.

I don't get why people think this is controversial.

I don't think it's an issue because it hasn't yet become an issue. We got in when we deserved it. Ironically, a blue blood like Ohio State has a much bigger gripe with the subjectivity of the committee than any Pac-12 team. So far no harm no foul for us.

 

[FireCohen]

god damn, i love CFB

 

[UW_Doog_Bot]

Congrats on fucking up another sure thing. You let a half retarded QB lead another mediocre comeback against your miserable SQWAD of flexing dipshits. The Pac-12 still sucks because of you dumbfucks. Thanks for nothing.

They may have just kept us out of the playoff. This could be the quook master plan.

Go undefeated and we are in. 11-1 and we are likely in.

Beat everyone, nothing else matters

undefeated - in

11-1 - out

Not likely. 11-1 probably gets us in, just depends on what happens around us.

But despite shit non conference schedules and all the "ESPN hates us" inferiority complex we have recently been both the lowest playoff team in and the lowest New Year's Six team in.

Smart money is on a one loss UW team to make the playoff, though it's certainly not a sure thing.

We were the clear #3 team and got seeded 4th in the playoff in 2016. Making it to a NY6 isn't really anyone's concern. We can easily do that at 11-1.

Of course we get into an NY6 at 11-1, that wasn't my point. My point is we have gotten *in* when conventional wisdom had us *out* with the playoff and sort of with the NY6 (plenty of people here thought we'd get screwed out of a spot).

If we go 11-1 we'll most likely be in the playoff.

I disagree we were the clear #3 in 2016 heading into the playoff, BTW.

The chances that Alabama, Clemson, Georgia, and Ohio state will lose more than one game is low.

Throw in Oklahoma, LSU, Michigan, and Norte dame possibly going 11-1 or better...

UW will have to go undefeated to make the playoffs this year because the perception of the pac12 is that bad.

It’s college football though so maybe we go 10-3 and it’s a mute point anyways

We don't need Bama, Clemson, Georgia and Ohio State all to lose more than one game. Just one of them and Oklahoma and Notre Dame.*

That's it.

It's highly likely that it happens. It happens damn near every year.

The hard part is us only losing one game.

*Michigan doesn't matter because there's no way two Big Ten teams teams get in ahead of a one loss Pac champ. LSU? You have to be joking. Ed Orgeron is not going 11-1. FOH.

Even really good teams don't go undefeated. We see it every year. It's statistically hard to do better than 10-2 over the course of a season unless you are elite.

 

[pawz]

Congrats on fucking up another sure thing. You let a half retarded QB lead another mediocre comeback against your miserable SQWAD of flexing dipshits. The Pac-12 still sucks because of you dumbfucks. Thanks for nothing.

They may have just kept us out of the playoff. This could be the quook master plan.

Go undefeated and we are in. 11-1 and we are likely in.

Beat everyone, nothing else matters

undefeated - in

11-1 - out

Not likely. 11-1 probably gets us in, just depends on what happens around us.

But despite shit non conference schedules and all the "ESPN hates us" inferiority complex we have recently been both the lowest playoff team in and the lowest New Year's Six team in.

Smart money is on a one loss UW team to make the playoff, though it's certainly not a sure thing.

We were the clear #3 team and got seeded 4th in the playoff in 2016. Making it to a NY6 isn't really anyone's concern. We can easily do that at 11-1.

Of course we get into an NY6 at 11-1, that wasn't my point. My point is we have gotten *in* when conventional wisdom had us *out* with the playoff and sort of with the NY6 (plenty of people here thought we'd get screwed out of a spot).

If we go 11-1 we'll most likely be in the playoff.

I disagree we were the clear #3 in 2016 heading into the playoff, BTW.

The chances that Alabama, Clemson, Georgia, and Ohio state will lose more than one game is low.

Throw in Oklahoma, LSU, Michigan, and Norte dame possibly going 11-1 or better...

UW will have to go undefeated to make the playoffs this year because the perception of the pac12 is that bad.

It’s college football though so maybe we go 10-3 and it’s a mute[/b] point anyways

Woooooooooooooosh!

Maybe you should send @IrishDawg22 a PM. He has this place dialed in.