James would have gone undefeated in 97, and quite possibly in 96. He would have recognized Dillon's talents earlier than Lambo did.Goes so far to say that Lambo (as a HC) needed a better AD.
Had Lambright not been fired he would have had his best recruiting class as a head coach. Rick survived for awhile with Jim's recruits. Jim and Dick Baird were better evaluators, recruiters in terms of knowing the need for balanced classes and solid lines.
So, I don't agree with your summation at all. Lambright had a lot of talent on campus that was young and we were building the numbers back from sanctions. He would have won a ton of games going forward had he not been fired. Jim really needed a good AD - he didn't have one.
This was in response to a poster telling him Lambo went 7-4 with the best roster in the conference.
Had James been coach UW finishes the 1994, 1996 and 1997 season in the top 10. They are competing for National Titles as well. He probably wins the conference in 1995 as well as the conference was down that year and there for the taking.
Does he win the conference all four years? Probably not especially in 1996 given the timing of the schedule of ASU game(team truly was young that year). I'd bet my house he wins the conference in 1994 and 1997. He also wins in 1995 as like I said not a great Husky team but the conference was down and Lambo flat fucking blew that season(Notre Dame, Oregon and USC fall on him plus the dreckfest bowl game was unacceptable).
The '97 team was very talented, but thin due to the sanctions and injuries. I don't think 12-0 or 11-1 were realistic because of those factors.
They still should have done better than 8-4. I wanted Lambo gone by then.
10-2 minimum. Brock threw like 5 picks against WSU and the Oregon game was a joke. A real coach would have played Nebraska much tougher than Lambright did. We had a loaded team. Look how many NFL players there were, and some of them were very good NFL players. I'm sure the UCLA game would have been a battle with James, but we were banged up and they were really good that year. I remember that team better than any. I would study the media guide for hours when I was a young lad.
Offense: Kruetz, Olson, Coats, Huard, Shehee, Pathon, Coleman, Cleeland. All of those guys played at least years in the NFL except for Coats. Even the back up TE (Brigham) played for awhile. Coleman didn't do much, but he bounced around for awhile.
Defense: Chorak, Issa, Mac Tuiea, Campbell, Jensen, Parrish. There were a couple other decent players like Burton, and Towns and Pharms were beasts for being freshman. I especially remember Towns. My dad and his friends thought he was going to be a superstar. The secondary was kind of weak because of youth and depth, and Marquis Hairston at ILB was pretty bad, but the defense should have been a lot better than it was. I give James most the credit for Lambright's defenses because they weren't very good once Lambright became head coach. Here is another example of the head coach being the only thing that really matters.
I don't and didn't follow the team like a lot of you guys. I mostly just watched or listened to them on Saturdays, and I'd read stuff in the Times or PI and listen to shows on KJR and Homo (75 k). This was before message boards of course. I just don't think James could have done a better than 10 and 2.
The 1998 squad pissed me off as much as the 1988 team. That was easily the worst and most underachieving team of the 90s. I don't really have time to get into it further but you get the point.