Petersen Pissed Away the Utah Game, but he won't Admit it

[RoadDawg55]

Nail on the head. Great poonts.

If you coach at Washington, you need to be run first.

I want to puke when he talks about Dawg weather. He is a fucking pass happy faggot who practices indoors when it rains.

It's fucking startling incompetence. I hate offense first/pass first fag coaches.

Whittingham outclassed Pete by simply doing the thing that made sense.

Fuck. I hate Pete's fucking bullshit.

Everyone on this bored knew: RUN THE BALL 30 TIMES TO GASKIN AND YOU WIN.

How could Pete not know that? It's not that he doesn't know it, it's just that he feels no pressure to win, doesn't give a fuck about stealing money from our fans and wants to prove he's right more than he wants to prove he knows how to win.

It's a fucking joke. FMFYFE.

Everyone on this board didn't check out Utah's defensive stats apparently

Sometimes, regardless of what the other team is good at, you stick with what you do best. What we do best is run the ball.

When Stanford plays Oregon this weekend, they will run the shit out of the ball despite Oregon having a porous pass defense. Same goes for when they play Utah.

The excuses for this staff are beyond old. If they cut the cutesy bullshit and played to the strength of the team, which is clearly running the ball, this season would look a lot better and we would all be pumped about next year.

 

[KnocksvilleE]

Nail on the head. Great poonts.

If you coach at Washington, you need to be run first.

I want to puke when he talks about Dawg weather. He is a fucking pass happy faggot who practices indoors when it rains.

It's fucking startling incompetence. I hate offense first/pass first fag coaches.

Whittingham outclassed Pete by simply doing the thing that made sense.

Fuck. I hate Pete's fucking bullshit.

Everyone on this bored knew: RUN THE BALL 30 TIMES TO GASKIN AND YOU WIN.

How could Pete not know that? It's not that he doesn't know it, it's just that he feels no pressure to win, doesn't give a fuck about stealing money from our fans and wants to prove he's right more than he wants to prove he knows how to win.

It's a fucking joke. FMFYFE.

Everyone on this board didn't check out Utah's defensive stats apparently

I don't need to use my eyes to look at numbers when I've watched enough of Utah to understand what they are and aren't good at.

92 vs 17 is a mssive difference. What the fuck are you seeing that makes you ignore such a massive disparity?

 

[RaceBannon]

We want a need a great coach. Period end of fucking story. Not interested in seeing if Petersen can improve to mediocre.

Race. We have a GREAT defense and the offense is only struggling because they are YOUNG. You are the worst type of Huskie fan.

Funny how the defense has young starters and key subs, yet aren't out there fucking the dog.

Nope:

Defensive starters: 4 SRs, 2 JRs, 5 SOs, 0 FR
Offensive starters: 3 SRs, 1 JR, 4 SOs, 3 FR (including QB, RB, and LT)

Offense is a hell of a lot younger than Defense

He didn't start the freshman RB. That's not a hell of a lot, its a little

3 True Freshmen (including the QB) to Zero. That is a lot.

Gaskin was the starter for the last few games before the Utah game and he is probably going to be for the AZ State game as well. And the True Freshman RB is getting a hell of a lot more carries than the Jr this season. So saying he wasn't the starter for the Utah game is trivial.

No its 2 because it isn't trivial its a fact. So 19% of the offense is true freshmen compared to 0%. That's a little not a lot like I said.

Did I stutter?

 

[KnocksvilleE]

We want a need a great coach. Period end of fucking story. Not interested in seeing if Petersen can improve to mediocre.

Race. We have a GREAT defense and the offense is only struggling because they are YOUNG. You are the worst type of Huskie fan.

Funny how the defense has young starters and key subs, yet aren't out there fucking the dog.

Nope:

Defensive starters: 4 SRs, 2 JRs, 5 SOs, 0 FR
Offensive starters: 3 SRs, 1 JR, 4 SOs, 3 FR (including QB, RB, and LT)

Offense is a hell of a lot younger than Defense

He didn't start the freshman RB. That's not a hell of a lot, its a little

3 True Freshmen (including the QB) to Zero. That is a lot.

Gaskin was the starter for the last few games before the Utah game and he is probably going to be for the AZ State game as well. And the True Freshman RB is getting a hell of a lot more carries than the Jr this season. So saying he wasn't the starter for the Utah game is trivial.

No its 2 because it isn't trivial its a fact. So 19% of the offense is true freshmen compared to 0%. That's a little not a lot like I said.

Did I stutter?

Nah you didn't stutter. You are just being stupid. What does it mean to be a starter if you play less than a backup?

 

[RaceBannon]

We want a need a great coach. Period end of fucking story. Not interested in seeing if Petersen can improve to mediocre.

Race. We have a GREAT defense and the offense is only struggling because they are YOUNG. You are the worst type of Huskie fan.

Funny how the defense has young starters and key subs, yet aren't out there fucking the dog.

Nope:

Defensive starters: 4 SRs, 2 JRs, 5 SOs, 0 FR
Offensive starters: 3 SRs, 1 JR, 4 SOs, 3 FR (including QB, RB, and LT)

Offense is a hell of a lot younger than Defense

He didn't start the freshman RB. That's not a hell of a lot, its a little

3 True Freshmen (including the QB) to Zero. That is a lot.

Gaskin was the starter for the last few games before the Utah game and he is probably going to be for the AZ State game as well. And the True Freshman RB is getting a hell of a lot more carries than the Jr this season. So saying he wasn't the starter for the Utah game is trivial.

No its 2 because it isn't trivial its a fact. So 19% of the offense is true freshmen compared to 0%. That's a little not a lot like I said.

Did I stutter?

Nah you didn't stutter. You are just being stupid. What does it mean to be a starter if you play less than a backup?

Had he started 3 freshman the idiot he did start wouldn't have fumbled twice and gave up a TD which kind of makes your point even more lame if that is even possible

thanks for dropping by now LEAVE

 

[RoadDawg55]

Nail on the head. Great poonts.

If you coach at Washington, you need to be run first.

I want to puke when he talks about Dawg weather. He is a fucking pass happy faggot who practices indoors when it rains.

It's fucking startling incompetence. I hate offense first/pass first fag coaches.

Whittingham outclassed Pete by simply doing the thing that made sense.

Fuck. I hate Pete's fucking bullshit.

Everyone on this bored knew: RUN THE BALL 30 TIMES TO GASKIN AND YOU WIN.

How could Pete not know that? It's not that he doesn't know it, it's just that he feels no pressure to win, doesn't give a fuck about stealing money from our fans and wants to prove he's right more than he wants to prove he knows how to win.

It's a fucking joke. FMFYFE.

Everyone on this board didn't check out Utah's defensive stats apparently

I don't need to use my eyes to look at numbers when I've watched enough of Utah to understand what they are and aren't good at.

92 vs 17 is a mssive difference. What the fuck are you seeing that makes you ignore such a massive disparity?

Answer the fucking question. When Stanford plays Oregon and Utah, do you think they will air it out?

 

[KnocksvilleE]

Nail on the head. Great poonts.

If you coach at Washington, you need to be run first.

I want to puke when he talks about Dawg weather. He is a fucking pass happy faggot who practices indoors when it rains.

It's fucking startling incompetence. I hate offense first/pass first fag coaches.

Whittingham outclassed Pete by simply doing the thing that made sense.

Fuck. I hate Pete's fucking bullshit.

Everyone on this bored knew: RUN THE BALL 30 TIMES TO GASKIN AND YOU WIN.

How could Pete not know that? It's not that he doesn't know it, it's just that he feels no pressure to win, doesn't give a fuck about stealing money from our fans and wants to prove he's right more than he wants to prove he knows how to win.

It's a fucking joke. FMFYFE.

Everyone on this board didn't check out Utah's defensive stats apparently

Sometimes, regardless of what the other team is good at, you stick with what you do best. What we do best is run the ball.

When Stanford plays Oregon this weekend, they will run the shit out of the ball despite Oregon having a porous pass defense. Same goes for when they play Utah.

The excuses for this staff are beyond old. If they cut the cutesy bullshit and played to the strength of the team, which is clearly running the ball, this season would look a lot better and we would all be pumped about next year.

Huskies aren't THAT much better at running the ball to excuse ignoring the fact that they would be running against the 17th ranked run defense instead of passing against the 92nd ranked pass defense.

Stanford's running game is FAR FAR better than their passing game and Oregon's run defense still sucks. I expect Stanford can run against almost anyone. The Huskies, not so much... They have to be more strategic.

As for the cutsie plays, I agree those are annoying as hell. And Lindquist is no Tim Tebow or Blake Bell so they need to give that up. But Peterson should eventually change. Coaches are stubborn, even great ones.

 

[KnocksvilleE]

Nail on the head. Great poonts.

If you coach at Washington, you need to be run first.

I want to puke when he talks about Dawg weather. He is a fucking pass happy faggot who practices indoors when it rains.

It's fucking startling incompetence. I hate offense first/pass first fag coaches.

Whittingham outclassed Pete by simply doing the thing that made sense.

Fuck. I hate Pete's fucking bullshit.

Everyone on this bored knew: RUN THE BALL 30 TIMES TO GASKIN AND YOU WIN.

How could Pete not know that? It's not that he doesn't know it, it's just that he feels no pressure to win, doesn't give a fuck about stealing money from our fans and wants to prove he's right more than he wants to prove he knows how to win.

It's a fucking joke. FMFYFE.

Everyone on this board didn't check out Utah's defensive stats apparently

I don't need to use my eyes to look at numbers when I've watched enough of Utah to understand what they are and aren't good at.

92 vs 17 is a mssive difference. What the fuck are you seeing that makes you ignore such a massive disparity?

Answer the fucking question. When Stanford plays Oregon and Utah, do you think they will air it out?

Are you comparing the Husky's run game to Stanford's?

 

[dnc]

At first I read the headline as "Petersen passed away at the Utah game".

What a fucking disappointment that turned out to be.

 

[Tequilla]

Nail on the head. Great poonts.

If you coach at Washington, you need to be run first.

I want to puke when he talks about Dawg weather. He is a fucking pass happy faggot who practices indoors when it rains.

It's fucking startling incompetence. I hate offense first/pass first fag coaches.

Whittingham outclassed Pete by simply doing the thing that made sense.

Fuck. I hate Pete's fucking bullshit.

Everyone on this bored knew: RUN THE BALL 30 TIMES TO GASKIN AND YOU WIN.

How could Pete not know that? It's not that he doesn't know it, it's just that he feels no pressure to win, doesn't give a fuck about stealing money from our fans and wants to prove he's right more than he wants to prove he knows how to win.

It's a fucking joke. FMFYFE.

Everyone on this board didn't check out Utah's defensive stats apparently

I don't need to use my eyes to look at numbers when I've watched enough of Utah to understand what they are and aren't good at.

92 vs 17 is a mssive difference. What the fuck are you seeing that makes you ignore such a massive disparity?

You missed the point big time ...

Anybody that watches Utah knows that running the ball on them is tough sledding and that in the defensive backfield they aren't going to have the elite athletes that other teams have that you normally associate with strong pass defenses. I don't need to see the ranking numbers to figure that out.

 

[Tequilla]

Nail on the head. Great poonts.

If you coach at Washington, you need to be run first.

I want to puke when he talks about Dawg weather. He is a fucking pass happy faggot who practices indoors when it rains.

It's fucking startling incompetence. I hate offense first/pass first fag coaches.

Whittingham outclassed Pete by simply doing the thing that made sense.

Fuck. I hate Pete's fucking bullshit.

Everyone on this bored knew: RUN THE BALL 30 TIMES TO GASKIN AND YOU WIN.

How could Pete not know that? It's not that he doesn't know it, it's just that he feels no pressure to win, doesn't give a fuck about stealing money from our fans and wants to prove he's right more than he wants to prove he knows how to win.

It's a fucking joke. FMFYFE.

Everyone on this board didn't check out Utah's defensive stats apparently

Sometimes, regardless of what the other team is good at, you stick with what you do best. What we do best is run the ball.

When Stanford plays Oregon this weekend, they will run the shit out of the ball despite Oregon having a porous pass defense. Same goes for when they play Utah.

The excuses for this staff are beyond old. If they cut the cutesy bullshit and played to the strength of the team, which is clearly running the ball, this season would look a lot better and we would all be pumped about next year.

These are the kinds of comments that shine a glaring light on identity, vision, plan, mission ... pick your favorite buzz word

 

[RoadDawg55]

Nail on the head. Great poonts.

If you coach at Washington, you need to be run first.

I want to puke when he talks about Dawg weather. He is a fucking pass happy faggot who practices indoors when it rains.

It's fucking startling incompetence. I hate offense first/pass first fag coaches.

Whittingham outclassed Pete by simply doing the thing that made sense.

Fuck. I hate Pete's fucking bullshit.

Everyone on this bored knew: RUN THE BALL 30 TIMES TO GASKIN AND YOU WIN.

How could Pete not know that? It's not that he doesn't know it, it's just that he feels no pressure to win, doesn't give a fuck about stealing money from our fans and wants to prove he's right more than he wants to prove he knows how to win.

It's a fucking joke. FMFYFE.

Everyone on this board didn't check out Utah's defensive stats apparently

I don't need to use my eyes to look at numbers when I've watched enough of Utah to understand what they are and aren't good at.

92 vs 17 is a mssive difference. What the fuck are you seeing that makes you ignore such a massive disparity?

Answer the fucking question. When Stanford plays Oregon and Utah, do you think they will air it out?

Are you comparing the Husky's run game to Stanford's?

Nail on the head. Great poonts.

If you coach at Washington, you need to be run first.

I want to puke when he talks about Dawg weather. He is a fucking pass happy faggot who practices indoors when it rains.

It's fucking startling incompetence. I hate offense first/pass first fag coaches.

Whittingham outclassed Pete by simply doing the thing that made sense.

Fuck. I hate Pete's fucking bullshit.

Everyone on this bored knew: RUN THE BALL 30 TIMES TO GASKIN AND YOU WIN.

How could Pete not know that? It's not that he doesn't know it, it's just that he feels no pressure to win, doesn't give a fuck about stealing money from our fans and wants to prove he's right more than he wants to prove he knows how to win.

It's a fucking joke. FMFYFE.

Everyone on this board didn't check out Utah's defensive stats apparently

I don't need to use my eyes to look at numbers when I've watched enough of Utah to understand what they are and aren't good at.

92 vs 17 is a mssive difference. What the fuck are you seeing that makes you ignore such a massive disparity?

Answer the fucking question. When Stanford plays Oregon and Utah, do you think they will air it out?

Are you comparing the Husky's run game to Stanford's?

Nice yeah, but still. I would have never predicted you would have this dumbass response.

 

[KnocksvilleE]

We want a need a great coach. Period end of fucking story. Not interested in seeing if Petersen can improve to mediocre.

Race. We have a GREAT defense and the offense is only struggling because they are YOUNG. You are the worst type of Huskie fan.

Funny how the defense has young starters and key subs, yet aren't out there fucking the dog.

Nope:

Defensive starters: 4 SRs, 2 JRs, 5 SOs, 0 FR
Offensive starters: 3 SRs, 1 JR, 4 SOs, 3 FR (including QB, RB, and LT)

Offense is a hell of a lot younger than Defense

He didn't start the freshman RB. That's not a hell of a lot, its a little

3 True Freshmen (including the QB) to Zero. That is a lot.

Gaskin was the starter for the last few games before the Utah game and he is probably going to be for the AZ State game as well. And the True Freshman RB is getting a hell of a lot more carries than the Jr this season. So saying he wasn't the starter for the Utah game is trivial.

No its 2 because it isn't trivial its a fact. So 19% of the offense is true freshmen compared to 0%. That's a little not a lot like I said.

Did I stutter?

Nah you didn't stutter. You are just being stupid. What does it mean to be a starter if you play less than a backup?

Had he started 3 freshman the idiot he did start wouldn't have fumbled twice and gave up a TD which kind of makes your point even more lame if that is even possible

thanks for dropping by now LEAVE

Before Washington's first fumble, Gaskin ran 5 times to Washington's 3, 6 to 4 before Washington's second fumble. So tell me again what it means that Washington was the starter? And Gaskin has been the starter for every game since Oregon (until Utah).

 

[KnocksvilleE]

Nail on the head. Great poonts.

If you coach at Washington, you need to be run first.

I want to puke when he talks about Dawg weather. He is a fucking pass happy faggot who practices indoors when it rains.

It's fucking startling incompetence. I hate offense first/pass first fag coaches.

Whittingham outclassed Pete by simply doing the thing that made sense.

Fuck. I hate Pete's fucking bullshit.

Everyone on this bored knew: RUN THE BALL 30 TIMES TO GASKIN AND YOU WIN.

How could Pete not know that? It's not that he doesn't know it, it's just that he feels no pressure to win, doesn't give a fuck about stealing money from our fans and wants to prove he's right more than he wants to prove he knows how to win.

It's a fucking joke. FMFYFE.

Everyone on this board didn't check out Utah's defensive stats apparently

I don't need to use my eyes to look at numbers when I've watched enough of Utah to understand what they are and aren't good at.

92 vs 17 is a mssive difference. What the fuck are you seeing that makes you ignore such a massive disparity?

You missed the point big time ...

Anybody that watches Utah knows that running the ball on them is tough sledding and that in the defensive backfield they aren't going to have the elite athletes that other teams have that you normally associate with strong pass defenses. I don't need to see the ranking numbers to figure that out.

Okay I thought you were disagreeing with me. NVM

 

[RaceBannon]

We want a need a great coach. Period end of fucking story. Not interested in seeing if Petersen can improve to mediocre.

Race. We have a GREAT defense and the offense is only struggling because they are YOUNG. You are the worst type of Huskie fan.

Funny how the defense has young starters and key subs, yet aren't out there fucking the dog.

Nope:

Defensive starters: 4 SRs, 2 JRs, 5 SOs, 0 FR
Offensive starters: 3 SRs, 1 JR, 4 SOs, 3 FR (including QB, RB, and LT)

Offense is a hell of a lot younger than Defense

He didn't start the freshman RB. That's not a hell of a lot, its a little

3 True Freshmen (including the QB) to Zero. That is a lot.

Gaskin was the starter for the last few games before the Utah game and he is probably going to be for the AZ State game as well. And the True Freshman RB is getting a hell of a lot more carries than the Jr this season. So saying he wasn't the starter for the Utah game is trivial.

No its 2 because it isn't trivial its a fact. So 19% of the offense is true freshmen compared to 0%. That's a little not a lot like I said.

Did I stutter?

Nah you didn't stutter. You are just being stupid. What does it mean to be a starter if you play less than a backup?

Had he started 3 freshman the idiot he did start wouldn't have fumbled twice and gave up a TD which kind of makes your point even more lame if that is even possible

thanks for dropping by now LEAVE

Before Washington's first fumble, Gaskin ran 5 times to Washington's 3, 6 to 4 before Washington's second fumble. So tell me again what it means that Washington was the starter? And Gaskin has been the starter for every game since Oregon (until Utah).

But I'm still right and you still fudged the numbers to make a bad point

 

[KnocksvilleE]

Nail on the head. Great poonts.

If you coach at Washington, you need to be run first.

I want to puke when he talks about Dawg weather. He is a fucking pass happy faggot who practices indoors when it rains.

It's fucking startling incompetence. I hate offense first/pass first fag coaches.

Whittingham outclassed Pete by simply doing the thing that made sense.

Fuck. I hate Pete's fucking bullshit.

Everyone on this bored knew: RUN THE BALL 30 TIMES TO GASKIN AND YOU WIN.

How could Pete not know that? It's not that he doesn't know it, it's just that he feels no pressure to win, doesn't give a fuck about stealing money from our fans and wants to prove he's right more than he wants to prove he knows how to win.

It's a fucking joke. FMFYFE.

Everyone on this board didn't check out Utah's defensive stats apparently

I don't need to use my eyes to look at numbers when I've watched enough of Utah to understand what they are and aren't good at.

92 vs 17 is a mssive difference. What the fuck are you seeing that makes you ignore such a massive disparity?

Answer the fucking question. When Stanford plays Oregon and Utah, do you think they will air it out?

Are you comparing the Husky's run game to Stanford's?

Nail on the head. Great poonts.

If you coach at Washington, you need to be run first.

I want to puke when he talks about Dawg weather. He is a fucking pass happy faggot who practices indoors when it rains.

It's fucking startling incompetence. I hate offense first/pass first fag coaches.

Whittingham outclassed Pete by simply doing the thing that made sense.

Fuck. I hate Pete's fucking bullshit.

Everyone on this bored knew: RUN THE BALL 30 TIMES TO GASKIN AND YOU WIN.

How could Pete not know that? It's not that he doesn't know it, it's just that he feels no pressure to win, doesn't give a fuck about stealing money from our fans and wants to prove he's right more than he wants to prove he knows how to win.

It's a fucking joke. FMFYFE.

Everyone on this board didn't check out Utah's defensive stats apparently

I don't need to use my eyes to look at numbers when I've watched enough of Utah to understand what they are and aren't good at.

92 vs 17 is a mssive difference. What the fuck are you seeing that makes you ignore such a massive disparity?

Answer the fucking question. When Stanford plays Oregon and Utah, do you think they will air it out?

Are you comparing the Husky's run game to Stanford's?

Nice yeah, but still. I would have never predicted you would have this dumbass response.

Stanford's Rushing Defense is ranked #15 in total yards and #24 in YPC while Washington's is 113 in total yards and 84th in YPC. Stanford can run on whoever they want. Washinton, not so much. Hell, Washington ranks better in passing than running at 71 in total yards and 54 in YPA (Washington state has a lower YPA!).

If Washington ran the ball against Utah, it would have been weakness on Utah's best strength. Instead it is Washington's kinda weakness on Utah's blaring weakness.

 

[KnocksvilleE]

We want a need a great coach. Period end of fucking story. Not interested in seeing if Petersen can improve to mediocre.

Race. We have a GREAT defense and the offense is only struggling because they are YOUNG. You are the worst type of Huskie fan.

Funny how the defense has young starters and key subs, yet aren't out there fucking the dog.

Nope:

Defensive starters: 4 SRs, 2 JRs, 5 SOs, 0 FR
Offensive starters: 3 SRs, 1 JR, 4 SOs, 3 FR (including QB, RB, and LT)

Offense is a hell of a lot younger than Defense

He didn't start the freshman RB. That's not a hell of a lot, its a little

3 True Freshmen (including the QB) to Zero. That is a lot.

Gaskin was the starter for the last few games before the Utah game and he is probably going to be for the AZ State game as well. And the True Freshman RB is getting a hell of a lot more carries than the Jr this season. So saying he wasn't the starter for the Utah game is trivial.

No its 2 because it isn't trivial its a fact. So 19% of the offense is true freshmen compared to 0%. That's a little not a lot like I said.

Did I stutter?

Nah you didn't stutter. You are just being stupid. What does it mean to be a starter if you play less than a backup?

Had he started 3 freshman the idiot he did start wouldn't have fumbled twice and gave up a TD which kind of makes your point even more lame if that is even possible

thanks for dropping by now LEAVE

Before Washington's first fumble, Gaskin ran 5 times to Washington's 3, 6 to 4 before Washington's second fumble. So tell me again what it means that Washington was the starter? And Gaskin has been the starter for every game since Oregon (until Utah).

But I'm still right and you still fudged the numbers to make a bad point

Keep telling yourself that.

 

[RaceBannon]

We want a need a great coach. Period end of fucking story. Not interested in seeing if Petersen can improve to mediocre.

Race. We have a GREAT defense and the offense is only struggling because they are YOUNG. You are the worst type of Huskie fan.

Funny how the defense has young starters and key subs, yet aren't out there fucking the dog.

Nope:

Defensive starters: 4 SRs, 2 JRs, 5 SOs, 0 FR
Offensive starters: 3 SRs, 1 JR, 4 SOs, 3 FR (including QB, RB, and LT)

Offense is a hell of a lot younger than Defense

He didn't start the freshman RB. That's not a hell of a lot, its a little

3 True Freshmen (including the QB) to Zero. That is a lot.

Gaskin was the starter for the last few games before the Utah game and he is probably going to be for the AZ State game as well. And the True Freshman RB is getting a hell of a lot more carries than the Jr this season. So saying he wasn't the starter for the Utah game is trivial.

No its 2 because it isn't trivial its a fact. So 19% of the offense is true freshmen compared to 0%. That's a little not a lot like I said.

Did I stutter?

Nah you didn't stutter. You are just being stupid. What does it mean to be a starter if you play less than a backup?

Had he started 3 freshman the idiot he did start wouldn't have fumbled twice and gave up a TD which kind of makes your point even more lame if that is even possible

thanks for dropping by now LEAVE

Before Washington's first fumble, Gaskin ran 5 times to Washington's 3, 6 to 4 before Washington's second fumble. So tell me again what it means that Washington was the starter? And Gaskin has been the starter for every game since Oregon (until Utah).

But I'm still right and you still fudged the numbers to make a bad point

Keep telling yourself that.

Ok

 

[KnocksvilleE]

We want a need a great coach. Period end of fucking story. Not interested in seeing if Petersen can improve to mediocre.

Race. We have a GREAT defense and the offense is only struggling because they are YOUNG. You are the worst type of Huskie fan.

Funny how the defense has young starters and key subs, yet aren't out there fucking the dog.

Nope:

Defensive starters: 4 SRs, 2 JRs, 5 SOs, 0 FR
Offensive starters: 3 SRs, 1 JR, 4 SOs, 3 FR (including QB, RB, and LT)

Offense is a hell of a lot younger than Defense

He didn't start the freshman RB. That's not a hell of a lot, its a little

3 True Freshmen (including the QB) to Zero. That is a lot.

Gaskin was the starter for the last few games before the Utah game and he is probably going to be for the AZ State game as well. And the True Freshman RB is getting a hell of a lot more carries than the Jr this season. So saying he wasn't the starter for the Utah game is trivial.

No its 2 because it isn't trivial its a fact. So 19% of the offense is true freshmen compared to 0%. That's a little not a lot like I said.

Did I stutter?

Nah you didn't stutter. You are just being stupid. What does it mean to be a starter if you play less than a backup?

Had he started 3 freshman the idiot he did start wouldn't have fumbled twice and gave up a TD which kind of makes your point even more lame if that is even possible

thanks for dropping by now LEAVE

Before Washington's first fumble, Gaskin ran 5 times to Washington's 3, 6 to 4 before Washington's second fumble. So tell me again what it means that Washington was the starter? And Gaskin has been the starter for every game since Oregon (until Utah).

But I'm still right and you still fudged the numbers to make a bad point

Keep telling yourself that.

Ok

So what numbers did I fudge? As I said, Gaskin has been the starter every game since Oregon, except for the Utah game (though he ran during the first drive and more than Washington anyway). And he has far more carries than Washington anyway.

 

[RaceBannon]

We want a need a great coach. Period end of fucking story. Not interested in seeing if Petersen can improve to mediocre.

Race. We have a GREAT defense and the offense is only struggling because they are YOUNG. You are the worst type of Huskie fan.

Funny how the defense has young starters and key subs, yet aren't out there fucking the dog.

Nope:

Defensive starters: 4 SRs, 2 JRs, 5 SOs, 0 FR
Offensive starters: 3 SRs, 1 JR, 4 SOs, 3 FR (including QB, RB, and LT)

Offense is a hell of a lot younger than Defense

He didn't start the freshman RB. That's not a hell of a lot, its a little

3 True Freshmen (including the QB) to Zero. That is a lot.

Gaskin was the starter for the last few games before the Utah game and he is probably going to be for the AZ State game as well. And the True Freshman RB is getting a hell of a lot more carries than the Jr this season. So saying he wasn't the starter for the Utah game is trivial.

No its 2 because it isn't trivial its a fact. So 19% of the offense is true freshmen compared to 0%. That's a little not a lot like I said.

Did I stutter?

Nah you didn't stutter. You are just being stupid. What does it mean to be a starter if you play less than a backup?

Had he started 3 freshman the idiot he did start wouldn't have fumbled twice and gave up a TD which kind of makes your point even more lame if that is even possible

thanks for dropping by now LEAVE

Before Washington's first fumble, Gaskin ran 5 times to Washington's 3, 6 to 4 before Washington's second fumble. So tell me again what it means that Washington was the starter? And Gaskin has been the starter for every game since Oregon (until Utah).

But I'm still right and you still fudged the numbers to make a bad point

Keep telling yourself that.

Ok

So what numbers did I fudge? As I said, Gaskin has been the starter every game since Oregon, except for the Utah game (though he ran during the first drive and more than Washington anyway). And he has far more carries than Washington anyway.

I pointed out quite clearly where you fudged your numbers. You just referenced it again.