Down year. Our overall talent and depth is better than Sark’s.
There were really only a handful of Sark players that did anything in 2016. Victor, Bierria, Qualls, and Eldrenkamp.
The leveling up stuff was always bullshit. We are a top 10-20 team in recruiting. We are underachieving. The talent has only been part of the problem. Pete’s had a horrible year as the coach. I think there has been some complacency that has set in.
We over achieved bigly in 2016- 18 based on recruiting. 2019 is our first underachieving year.
2016
1st in PAC; #4 Final Ranking
247 College Team Composite - #24 Nationally; #6 in PAC
Average Rank in PAC of 2012- 16 Classes- #6
2017
Tied for 2nd in PAC; #15 Final Ranking
247 College Team Composite - #24 Nationally; #6 in PAC
Average Rank in PAC of 2013- 17 Classes- #6
2018
1st in PAC; #13 Final Ranking
247 College Team Composite - #20 Nationally; #4 in PAC
Average Rank in PAC of 2014- 18 Classes- #4
2019
247 College Team Composite - #19 Nationally; #3 in PAC
Average Rank in PAC of 2015- 19 Classes- #4
I think the better you do as a team in the previous seasons, the better the players are ranked.
A player that commits to Alabama is going to be a four or five star. That same player with the same ability that commits to Kentucky gets rated lower.
We were really good in 2016 so we got slight inflations for our future players. It’s just a theory, but I’ve thought it to be true for awhile.
This seems plausible.