Petersen can't recruit...

http://www.sportingnews.com/nfl/story/2013-09-18/nfl-players-state-by-state-breakdown-california-florida-louisiana-texas-south-ca

California produced 225 guys in the NFL while Montana produced 9. Just saying.

Although Montana was higher up than I thought.
Click to expand...

Montana population = 1.005 million
California population = 38,042,853

Just sayin

 
A sample size of one Erik Kohler and one Montanan 30 y/o "high schooler" is a fucking retarded methodology for making any sort of assumptions regarding recruiting. Great unmedicated bullshit as always.
 
But with 38 x more people. Do the math.

http://www.sportingnews.com/nfl/story/2013-09-18/nfl-players-state-by-state-breakdown-california-florida-louisiana-texas-south-ca

California produced 225 guys in the NFL while Montana produced 9. Just saying.

Although Montana was higher up than I thought.
Click to expand...

 
But with 38 x more people. Do the math.

http://www.sportingnews.com/nfl/story/2013-09-18/nfl-players-state-by-state-breakdown-california-florida-louisiana-texas-south-ca

California produced 225 guys in the NFL while Montana produced 9. Just saying.

Although Montana was higher up than I thought.
Click to expand...
Click to expand...

Man we have some fucktards in here. Two posters responding to this poast yet didn't bother to read the follow up poast where I said Montana ranked 7th per capita as I was being fair to PLSS as well.
 
http://www.sportsnola.com/sports/sports-blogs/lenny-vangilder/599831-louisiana-again-produces-highest-number-of-nfl-players-per-capita.html

Cause I'm a fair person, Montana per capita ranks 7th in the nation in producing NFL guys to PLSS point.
Click to expand...

To the fucktards who missed this follow up poast.
 
I think the point is actually just an inference and one that I tend to agree with. If you have a chance at an unknown o-line prospect from the farm versus one from a dude brah region where recruiting analysts tend to live and overhype guys then I'd agree that you take a kid who just knows how to work at mowing the field.
 
@CollegeDoog

I like the sig. Little blonde wholesome chick is not normally my type, but there is something about her that makes me want to test her labia strength.
 
Considering there are only roughly 60 power conference schools, recruiting a class that is in the 30's should be less than acceptable.

Nice tits.

 
@CollegeDoog

I like the sig. Little blonde wholesome chick is not normally my type, but there is something about her that makes me want to test her labia strength.
Click to expand...

It's a bonus that 2/3 are pretty hot, but the selfie faces make me want to punch my computer screen.
 
@CollegeDoog

I like the sig. Little blonde wholesome chick is not normally my type, but there is something about her that makes me want to test her labia strength.
Click to expand...

It's a bonus that 2/3 are pretty hot, but the selfie faces make me want to punch my computer screen.
Click to expand...

I punched my screen also, with my dick.

I really want to see if she will make those faces when I go backyard with no lube.
 
What does Doogman think of this situation?

If we don't think about Doogman, most people here will lose their frame of reference.
 
http://www.sportingnews.com/nfl/story/2013-09-18/nfl-players-state-by-state-breakdown-california-florida-louisiana-texas-south-ca

California produced 225 guys in the NFL while Montana produced 9. Just saying.

Although Montana was higher up than I thought.
Click to expand...

Would have guessed more from Arkansas and less from Connecticut

If you add Florida, Georgia and Alabama, you get Cali +. Add in Louisiana, and you get a bunch more.

As either dnc or race said, it's about the region, and that region, if you focus on land area to make it comparable to Cali in size and ignore state boundaries, just fucking rules in terms of producing football talent.

But where do the best rowers come from? You guessed it!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top