Petersen and TBS - Something to consider.

Mora hadn't been recruiting them either and he's doing fine
Click to expand...

Huffman and Eklund are each about as reliable as Kim. Ive known Brandon a long time and he is a USC buttsniffer, just like Biggins (who knows his shit, but loves buttfucking the dawgman-3 to help boost his readership)

Petersen recruits 4-5* too. He just doesnt have a lot of luck getting them to play on a fucktarded blue field, in the middle of a state that hates black people. Come on Bluffman, EVERY HIGH SCHOOL COACH IN CALIFORNA knows BSU, Petersen and his exploits on the field (green and blue).

Petersen can walk into any 4-5*'s house and load up on collared greens, fried chicken and cornbread from mama, AND walk out with a committment. (Or a hamburger and fries depending on the household). Petersen's reputation and 90% winning-percentage speaks for itself Huffman ya tub-o-fuck ya. Matter of fact Petersen's honesty and cred will get him into plenty of 4-5* homess, and secure enough to wallop Sark's sqishy bottom on fall Saturdays. Enough Brandy!!!@
 
Winning 11 games next year will give us a better class than Sark ever sniffed at UW. Kids follow winners and want to play for winners. The whole excuse of "Oregon has Nike and Phil Knight and that gives them a recruiting advantage is bullshit. Kids go to Oregon because they have dominated the league for 5 years.
Click to expand...

Well that and the payroll.

 
This class isn't going to be up to most peoples' standards. I'll be surprised if he lands any 4* guys and he may struggle to fill all the open spots.

It's OK though. Dredge up some linemen somehow. Go ahead and gift a spot to that lefty QB. We're going to need depth there.

I'm just not worried.
Click to expand...

I'll take a skilled Zach Maynard on my roster.
 
This class isn't going to be up to most peoples' standards. I'll be surprised if he lands any 4* guys and he may struggle to fill all the open spots.

It's OK though. Dredge up some linemen somehow. Go ahead and gift a spot to that lefty QB. We're going to need depth there.

I'm just not worried.
Click to expand...

I'll take a skilled Zach Maynard on my roster.
Click to expand...

That's like saying "I'll take a clutch Tony Romo on my roster"

A skilled Zach Maynard actually made me laugh out loud.
 
I appreciate Passion's work in bringing Doogman logic to this bored so I don't have to go over there to read it.
Click to expand...

doogman.com definitely has a self-serving agenda, but it would be funny if doogman.com became the place that allowed people to openly express opinions/thoughts over how the program will shape up under Petersen, while this place quashed concerns and criticism.
 
What did anyone expect? Race nailed it. It's been a fucking week. I doubt it will be a great class, but it's awfully warm for February. We will get some good players and hopefully develop the average ones a lot better than Sark and crew did.
 
Passion- nobody is quashing you. They are answering you.

Some of you need to learn the difference
 
I appreciate Passion's work in bringing Doogman logic to this bored so I don't have to go over there to read it.
Click to expand...

doogman.com definitely has a self-serving agenda, but it would be funny if doogman.com became the place that allowed people to openly express opinions/thoughts over how the program will shape up under Petersen, while this place quashed concerns and criticism.
Click to expand...

No one deletes your posts here. We don't quash concerns and criticism, we mock it when it is KimGrinoldsFuckingStupid.
 
I appreciate Passion's work in bringing Doogman logic to this bored so I don't have to go over there to read it.
Click to expand...

doogman.com definitely has a self-serving agenda, but it would be funny if doogman.com became the place that allowed people to openly express opinions/thoughts over how the program will shape up under Petersen, while this place quashed concerns and criticism.
Click to expand...

No one deletes your posts here. We don't quash concerns and criticism, we mock it when it is KimGrinoldsFuckingStupid.
Click to expand...

Saying that a coach from a second-tier conference needs to develop relationships with kids he hasn't previously recruited is "kimgrinoldsfuckingstupid?" Ok brainiac, when somebody accuses you of being smart I'll agree.
 
Bull shit. Anyone that knows anything about college football knows who Petersen is. High school coaches and the kids that do 3 minutes of research know or will quickly understand that Petersen is a massive upgrade from Cream Puff.

This class might be a little light in the britches because of Shark. If Petersen does his job, recruiting will be at 100% for the 2015 class.

No excusses are being offered, none will be excepted.
 
Bull shit. Anyone that knows anything about college football knows who Petersen is. High school coaches and the kids that do 3 minutes of research know or will quickly understand that Petersen is a massive upgrade from Cream Puff.

This class might be a little light in the britches because of Shark. If Petersen does his job, recruiting will be at 100% for the 2015 class.

No excusses are being offered, none will be excepted.
Click to expand...

Sorry, but kids are stupid. Many of them like sark, brah.

By the way, from the December 15 Seattle Times: "The Huskies have just five committed recruits for 2014, the fewest of any program in a BCS conference. The UW class is currently ranked last in the Pac-12 by the three main recruiting services (Scout, Rivals and 247sports.com) and as low as 101st in the nation."

Since we have the fewest committed recruits of any school in the BCS, I guess we're the only school in the BCS to experience a coaching change.
 
Last edited:
Let the excuse making begin...

If this is going to be the case, why is it seeming like he's going to let the current staff walk? And why doesn't he go after proven pac12 recruiters who have these relationships? If he brings all small time guys and simply doubles their salaries, big disappointment. Hell, even if he keeps Tui and Tosh ad hires another P12 coach, that's better than keeping the entire BSU staff because he's too loyal. I'm willing to LIFPO, but if it takes him almost 2 full classes to develop relationships with Washington-calibre players, that's all on Pete.
Click to expand...

It has to be mostly about recruiting, right? Screw the art of coaching-up the kids by position once they arrive in the program. A head coach will have his own staff.... what a concept! And if he's new, most of the staff he hires for the new job will also be new.... workplace logic 101. CP so far has hired away from BSU assistants Kwiatkowski (DC), Strausser (OL), and Bhonapha (RB's),.... all three of whom according to local Boise media have been very good recruiters with Bhonapha reportedly CP's top recruiter, but what can they know for it's only the Mountain West. I'm intrigued by Strausser and whether or not the presence on UW's staff of a damn good OL coach and recruiter will, after an absence of nearly 20 years, somehow get us back in the game of recruiting football's most important position, offensive linemen.

 
Bull shit. Anyone that knows anything about college football knows who Petersen is. High school coaches and the kids that do 3 minutes of research know or will quickly understand that Petersen is a massive upgrade from Cream Puff.

This class might be a little light in the britches because of Shark. If Petersen does his job, recruiting will be at 100% for the 2015 class.

No excusses are being offered, none will be excepted.
Click to expand...

Sorry, but kids are stupid. Many of them like sark, brah.

By the way, from the December 15 Seattle Times: "The Huskies have just five committed recruits for 2014, the fewest of any program in a BCS conference. The UW class is currently ranked last in the Pac-12 by the three main recruiting services (Scout, Rivals and 247sports.com) and as low as 101st in the nation."

Since we have the fewest committed recruits of any school in the BCS, I guess we're the only school in the BCS to experience a coaching change.
Click to expand...

That would have been defended, explained, and perfectly acceptable under Sark.

Only thing we fans need to worry about is winning ... last I heard it was contagious.
 
What was not explained at the the time, is why UW's commit list seemed to go almost completely dormant about the time USC's coaching situation blew-up in their faces. I wasn't paying attention at all until Sark announced he was quitting to return to L.A. Then I looked and suddenly, our commit list was only six verbals, two of which were considered soft. I would not expect the media which follows recruiting to know squat about what was happening at USC, but high school coaches especially in California likely did know and together with parents, those are the people who have the most influence on recruits. Looking back, I don't think it's conspiratorial or strange that Sark's recruiting apparently went dead in the water not so long after the USC job became available.
 
Eh, Sark is a fucktarded football coach, but he's a smart businessman.

He knew this would be his only chance to jump to USC, and he knew that USC's the kind of program that can mask his shitty player development behind sheer recruit talent. So when the job became available, he started hedging his bets. He was still recruiting, but he was just locking down soft verbal commits. Sark wanted guys to commit to Sark, not to UW. Then the planets align, he moves to LA, and brings all those recruits with.

Fuck, whatever. It's dirty pool, but it's smart business. And it doesn't change anything. I'd take 0 recruits in this class, if it meant getting rid of Sark and hiring a real coach.
 
I mean seriously its been a fucking week. Who is giving him a pass. Fuck Brandon whoever. Think for yourself for fucks sake.
Click to expand...

I feel those in the media/Doogs are harder on Petersen in one week than on Dude Brah in 5 years.

Where the fuck was this concern when Sark chose FREE PUB!!!! over doing his job?
Click to expand...

Sark didn't coach Boise State for eight years and then have the gall to believe he could coach in the Pac-12.

 
This class isn't going to be up to most peoples' standards. I'll be surprised if he lands any 4* guys and he may struggle to fill all the open spots.

It's OK though. Dredge up some linemen somehow. Go ahead and gift a spot to that lefty QB. We're going to need depth there.

I'm just not worried.
Click to expand...

I'll take a skilled Zach Maynard on my roster.
Click to expand...

That's like saying "I'll take a clutch Tony Romo on my roster"

A skilled Zach Maynard actually made me laugh out loud.
Click to expand...

This class isn't going to be up to most peoples' standards. I'll be surprised if he lands any 4* guys and he may struggle to fill all the open spots.

It's OK though. Dredge up some linemen somehow. Go ahead and gift a spot to that lefty QB. We're going to need depth there.

I'm just not worried.
Click to expand...

I'll take a skilled Zach Maynard on my roster.
Click to expand...

That's like saying "I'll take a clutch Tony Romo on my roster"

A skilled Zach Maynard actually made me laugh out loud.
Click to expand...

More_cock, Maynard was a crafty and elusive qb in the pocket. Just couldnt deliver the football with any consistency. They are mirror images except this kid can throw. If you didnt see how good Maynard was in the pocket, and getting the throw off your're blind (Just didnt reach his target often) Look outside the obvious More_Cock, its right in ffont of you
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top