Paging all metrics doogs

[PostGameOrangeSlices]

https://www.espn.com/college-footba...5426/college-football-sp+-rankings-bowl-games

This article has a paywall, but it's the updated SP+ football rankings.

Of note...the DAWGS finish #15...behind #11 Oregon...and FUCKING #8 TEXAS

Someone take this stupid ass computer and throw if off the Aurora Bridge.

 

[haie]

I took @MetricsConsensus to task earlier this season.

Coaching adjustments don't exist. If a key variable can't be quantified it is ignored entirely.

Invalid.

Delete.

 

[Doogles]

Not enough data points to mean much in college football.

 

[PostGameOrangeSlices]

Not enough data points to mean much in college football.

Dude...this dumb ass has Oklahoma at #18. They finished 6-7

 

[RoadDawg55]

Not enough data points to mean much in college football.

Dude...this dumb ass has Oklahoma at #18. They finished 6-7

I’ve never given a shit about the metrics. I remember in 2014, Florida State went 12-1 and was ranked behind 6-6 Arkansas. A team that had way more talent and made the playoff was somehow worse than Arkansas because they played Alabama to the wire. They are fucking stupid.

Texas at #8 over UW…. 11-2 to 8-5 and the 8-5 team got beat (rather easily). That makes sense.

 

[EsophagealFeces]

Metrics are for losers. And fags. Abundance.

 

[Baseman]

How do we compare with Clemson? Are we leveling up? Natty in our? future? Is 2024 looking special?